Thursday, August 24, 2017

RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA IS NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT SAYS CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL



https://thewire.in/170303/supreme-court-aadhaar-right-to-privacy/

Readers ,

I WAS THINKING OF TERMINATING MY BLOG SO THAT  I SPEND THIS TIME SAVED ( MOST OF MY AWAKE HOURS IN A DAY ) WITH MY FAMILY .

I GUESS YOU WILL HAVE TO KISS MY REVELATIONS FROM 52% TO 100% GOOD BYE !     

LODURAMS CANT HANDLE THE CHOOTIYANANDA TRUTHS AT 51%--  AND THE CURVE IS ONLY GONNA RISE STEEPLY  .    


INDIANS AND PEOPLE OF THIS PLANET ARE NOT READY FOR HARSH TRUTHS.

HOWEVER I GUESS I WILL PEN ONE MORE BLOG POST – 

BECAUSE IF I DONT DO THIS, THE COLLEGIUM JUDGES WILL RUIN OUR DEMOCRACY .. 

THESE MELORDS WILL MAKE INDIAN SLAVES TO FOREIGN FORCES , ALL OVER AGAIN -- IN THE NAME OF GIVING INDIANS MORE FREEDOM


WE KNOW HOW MESSIAHs LIKE GANDHI SOLD US "SELECTIVE " AHIMSA AND ALLOWED HIS MASTER JEW ROTHSCHILD TO ENSLAVE INDIA


Readers , first of all the decision by the 9 judges ( unanimous ) is NULL AND VOID as the constitution does NOT allow the Collegium judges to deliver such a SWEEPING verdict in a democracy like ours .

The Indian constitution does NOT allow a COLLEGIUM SYSTEM .  This is the biggest reason.

INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION ON THE PLANET WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES –ALMOST LIKE THE JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS   ( WHO ARE MOSTLY DESH DROHIS )


We don’t want loser lawyers turned judges to save India.    India had enough of the quintessential “Solis and Falis “ hijacking the watan since 1947.  

These non-technical brained   " loser lawyers turned judges " ( bottom dregs of the school cerebral barrel ) dont even know what is BODMAS and how to apply it to our constitution.


The most hilarious part is that all benami media TV channels have got gays and homosexuals to declare on TV that this new PRIVACY judgement by melords—automatically strikes down sec 377 against homosexuals --who have been clubbed as LGBT along with transgenders.

APPIDIYAAAA ?



Notorous gay Ashok Kavi Row is having a field day today – along with some pathetic  creatures  whose mothers were whores.

We have empathy for transgenders –  NOT for homosexuals ,  99.5% of whom are pedophiles. 

If any homosexual does not agree— pleaajjje , kindly agree to a NARCO truth serum test so that we can find out how many minors they have raped/ molested till today—  and at what tender age they first got raped / molested

THE SAME NINE MELORDS WILL NOT WANT “RIGHT TO INFORMATION”  ( RTI ) TO BE AFFORDED TO FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs,   ABOUT OUR NUCLEAR AND SPACE FACILITIES..    

STRANGE INCONSISTECY THIS !!


THIS IS WHY WE WANT INTELLIGENT PEOPLE TO WEAR JUDGES ROBES –SELECTED BY AN EXAM PROCESS LIKE IIT/ IAS .   

WE ARE DONE WITH “LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES “ PLAYING GOD OR DOING EXTREME JUDICIAL OVERREACH.


The whole PRIVACY thingy boils down to Collegium Judiciary NOT wanting AADHAR.

Listen , I was the first to say, “we the people “ will NOT accept AADHAR card with a EMBEDDED SATELLITE TRACKING CHIP and BLOOD GROUP information. 

If this is afforded you will be murdered for your kidney

The current Aadhar car just has IRIS and FINGER PRINT information

So –what is wrong with that ?   Only people with brains need reply !    Bottom dregs of the school cerebral barrel--LAY THE FUCK OFF !


You cant enter USA unless they have your IRIS and FINGER PRINT information in their database—even if you have gone there for a one HOUR vacation



Previously, the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 made changes to the Information Technology Act, 2000 and added the following two sections relating to Privacy:--

Section 43A, which deals with implementation of reasonable security practices for sensitive personal data or information and provides for the compensation of the person affected by wrongful loss or wrongful gain.

Section 72A, which provides for imprisonment for a period up to 3 years and/or a fine up to Rs. 500,000 for a person who causes wrongful loss or wrongful gain by disclosing personal information of another person while providing services under the terms of lawful contract.

A constitutional bench of the Supreme Court declared 'Privacy' as a fundamental right on August 24, 2017—TODAY !.


BALLS !




In June 2011, India passed a new privacy package that included various new rules that apply to companies and consumers.   A key aspect of the new rules requires that any organization that processes personal information must obtain written consent from the data subjects before undertaking certain activities. Application of the rule is still uncertain.


Privacy laws can be broadly classified into:-- 

General privacy laws that have an overall bearing on the personal information of individuals and affect the policies that govern many different areas of information.

Specific privacy laws that are designed to regulate specific types of information. Some examples include:--

Communication privacy laws
Financial privacy laws
Health privacy laws
Information privacy laws
Online privacy laws

Privacy in one's home ( sorry we wont allow a wife to FUCK her dog instead of her husband—nor we will allow a gay to shove his prick into the WEE shit hole of his neighbor’s small son )


WE HAD ROGUE GURU SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV ( WHO SPEAKS AT UN AND INTERNATIONAL FREEMASON SEMINARS )  TELLING INDIANS ON TV THAT WE SHOULD NOT BOTHER ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.   

SORRY, KARMA CATCHES UP BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.


WE DON’T WANT ROTHSCHILDs “JUSTICE IS BLIND” SYSTEM.   

WE WANT “NATURAL JUSTICE” TO HAVE XRAY EYES TO PRESERVE THE RULE OF DHARMA ( NOT THAILAND WAALAH PEDOPHILE DHAMMA )


We the people who are above the constitution, will NOT allow pedophilia and bestiality to be covered by privacy laws

What the hell is all this bullshit about privacy ?...


I don't think my Aadhar card invades my privacy.. and I am an intelligent guy.


Privacy law refers to the laws that deal with regulating, storing, and using of personally identifiable information of individuals, which can be collected by governments, public or private organizations, or by other individuals.

Right to privacy is not an absolute right; it has limitations that need to be identified on case-to-case basis as correctly said by our Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad.


Today in Kerala we have hundreds of illegal Bangladesi immigrants  all of them with FAKE ID.   Lot of them are building watchmen and they get more money than the IT graduates and postgraduates.

The Italian waitress wont mind it—the way Hillary Clinton does NOT mind illegal Mexican immigrants to vote for her bumpkin Democratic party.

Desh drohi Benami media, the commies and the stooges of the Italian waitress are doing rabid propaganda as if Modi loves to peep into the bedrooms of homosexuals with syphilitic pricks ,fissured assholes and purulent twats .

And here is the MAGIC wand—a PRIVACY RULING by collegium melords which will make everything ENJIKREW AND HUNKY DORY

How stupid can these CUNTS be ?


Mind you our honourable nay venerable CJI JS Khekar supported TRIPLE TALAQ--  what is this fellow -- nay-- Melord worth ?.   

I know of this sardarjee "lawyer turned judge" from his own neighbor decades ago.

He now wants foreign lawyers in India.  

For what Melord?  


These pathetic  melords do NOT know (nor have the brains) to understand this PARAMOUNT truth

Above the “constitution” lies WE THE PEOPLE

Above “we the people” lies the WATAN

Above the “watan” lies DHARMA .

Dharma protects the righteous and provides fairness to good people .   It is NATURAL JUSTICE .

Neither Dharma ( refer to 6000 year old Bhagawad Gita ) nor our constitution protects traitors who hold foreign guns and point it on Bharatmata

Judiciary is just another pillar of our democracy .

Judges cant create laws. 

They can only interpret the laws— only when invited .. it is NOT their call on whims and MUNGERILAL KA RANGEEN SAPNE  personal fancies   

And definitely not when invited by foreign funded desh drohis using the PIL route with ulterior motives.

Judges must know what is CONTEMPT OF COURT .   

It exists only within the court room ,  for that particular case so that the system does not break down  .   

It does NOT extend underwater , under the ground , in space and along the length and breadth of India  .  

We the people have a right to express our opinions.


Nothing is above national security and Dharma


WE ASK THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE ( AND THE ELECTED LEGISLATURE ) TO SHOW THE MELORDS THAT THEIR SPINES ARE NOT MADE OF RUBBER .


We ask the Modi govt – DENY GOVT SERVICES TO ALL THOSE WITHOUT A AADHAR CARD

WE ASK MODI TO GO ONE STEP FURTHER – FUCK PRIVACY , AND FUCK IT GOOD

LINK AADHAR CARD WITH VOTERs ID.


SEND THE ILLEGAL ISLAMIC VOTER BASE OF MAMATA BANNERJEE  BACK TO BANGLADESH

LINK AADHAR CARD WITH PAN CARD TO GET RID OF THE SCOURGE OF SHELL COMPANIES 

IT TOOK A 33 PART "SHELL SERIES" POST FOR A BLOGGER TO WAKE UP THE INDIAN GOVT


THESE MELORDS  WHO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH AADHAR CARD , HAD NO PROBLEM WHEN FOREIGN DESH DROHIS WERE FUNDING THE “SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL”



WE CANNOT DIGITALISE INDIA UNLESS WE USE AADHAR CARD

INDIA CANNOT BECOME THE NO 1 SUPERPOWER ON THIS PLANET UNLESS WITH PROJECT OUR TRUE GDP AND GROWTH— WE NEED TO WEED OUT CORRUPTION AND EXPOSE THE CORRUPT BASTARDS 


Google and Facebook know more about you than Aadhaar.

TODAY EVERY DESH DROHI AND CRIMINAL IN INDIA IS CELEBRATING THIS “PRIVACY RULING” .  

SORRY FOLKS, OUR ELECTED EXECUTIVE IS NOT A SLAVE TO COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ANYMORE –

THOSE DAYS ARE GONE.

THE DAY IS NOT FAR WHEN RETIRED JUDGES WILL BE IN JAIL—CHAKKI PEESING.   THEY HAVE BEEN CARELESS WHEN ABROAD

Today I saw BUNTY SIBAL celebrating on TV.  

This slimy fellow imposed sec 66A on India so that CRYING BOLLYWOOD superstars can derive ego massage  , and Italian QUEEN BEE can be safe from truthful criticism




Privacy cannot be above the interests of the watan.  Aadhar is a basic tool to weed out corruption and to nab criminals who are shored up by the Judicial system .

While the judiciary has been quick to protect Naxals and separatists —when did you last see these judges caring for a uniformed jawan, who also has a family ?

The present Collegium system is worse than the Justice system setup by Rothschild prior Independence.

THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WHICH IS SUPPORTED BY ROTHSCHILDs AGENTS LIKE JEW NOAM CHOMSKY, WANTS TO ESTABLISH ITSELF AS THE SOLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY ( SANS ACCOUNTABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY )  ,  WITH THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE AS ITS MENIAL PEONS .


 WE THE PEOPLE WONT ALLOW THIS – COME WHAT MAY!    

NEVER MIND THAT PM MODI DOES NOT HAVE THE BALLS TO TAKE ON THE JUDICIARY

IS PRIVACY LAWS HELPING MILLIONS OF POOR INDIANS WHO WORRY WHERE THEIR NEXT MEAL WILL COME FROM— THOSE UNFORTUNATE CHILDREN OF BHARATMATA WHO SLEEP ON THE ROADS ?

WE WILL NOT ALLOW THE SOLIs AND FALIs ( READ AS LOSER LAWYER TURNED JUDGES AND CORRUPT LAWYERS ) TO RULE INDIA.

A LOT OF THESE JUDGES AND LAWYERS HIDE THEIR WEALTH ACCUMULATED FAR BEYOND THEIR KNOWN SOURCES OF INCOME

PRIVACY IS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT IN ANY DEMOCRACY.    BUT IT IS NOT ABSOLUTE.    NATIONAL INTERESTS OR LEGITIMATE INVESTIGATIONS CANNOT BE SCUTTLED.

It will be wise not to blindly copy Western privacy laws.  Our priority is a foolproof identification system to deliver social benefits to millions of extremely poor people , some things can wait till the appropriate time.

"WE THE PEOPLE"  WILL NOT ALLOW COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO RIDE ROUGHSHOD OVER THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE—  EVEN IF PM MODI DOES NOT HAVE THE BALLS TO RESIST

WE JUST SAW THE CEC ELECT AHMED PATEL -- NOT ALLOWING TWO MLAs FREEDOM OF CHOICE AND FREE WILL.  

PAKISTAN BURSTS CRACKERS --SHOBHAA DE CHEERED 

WE DONT WANT TO PROVIDE ANY PRIVACY TO THE FOREIGN FUNDED ENEMIES OF THE WATAN AND CRIMINALS WHO TRY TO SINK RULE OF  DHARMA

No right is absolute. There are duties attached to it.

DHARMA CANNOT PREVAIL WHEN THERE IS ABSOLUTE PRIVACY—WE HAVE JUST COME OUT OF 800 YEARS OF SLAVERY

Only traitors , terrorists , separatists , criminals and anti social elements will be very happy with today's SC judgement.    Just shows what the supreme court is worth.

Privacy for what? To hide misdeeds?

People who are most vocal for privacy on TV are mostly immoral persons from inside , those who have rotten secrets to hide

HOMOSEXUALS ( PEDOPHILES ),  AND CROOKS RUNNING SHELL COMPANIES ARE THE ONES WHO ARE LOUDLY CELEBRATING THE “PRIVACY” JUDGEMENT.

Criminals  with  FAKE Pan cards and benami properties are leaving no stone unturned to hide behind privacy rights, so that that can continue to loot the country.   

Hey Benami land owners – the noose will soon be around your necks. Wait for it !  Every square meter of land in India will be mapped to check out the benami owners and land grabbers

Read all 8 parts below--


Melords and Bilderberg Club created NHRC wont be able to save you.




Forget about PRIVACY-- nothing is absolute in this world or this universe except the one supreme GOD.

In India you have more many times more tax evaders than tax payers. This puts huge burden on honest tax payers. So Aadhar card is a MUST.  Some people oppose this just because they have an axe to grind with PM Modi

PRIVACY CANT BE ABSOLUTE....IN GARB OF PRIVACY AND VEILED FACES ,LOT OF DESH DROHI AND UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES CAN TAKE PLACE WHICH IS HARMFUL TO THE WATAN AND SOCIETY 

This judgement SHALL not  ban govt from collecting personal data from citizens.   It puts the onus on the govt to ensure that the data so collected is not misused or compromised.

The Modi govt must bring in strong and comprehensive data protection laws ASAP.

LISTEN, WE DONT WANT JUDGES OR MEDIA BARONS TO SAVE INDIA

The TARDY and slothful melords must first make sure they clear up the undertrial backlog


Aadhar per se doesn''t violate privacy just like mere applying for and obtaining passport or driving license.    

The real fear seems to be what if security of Aadhar data is breached and the data is misused because it contains private information such as phone number or bank account number of the person which is not available on other identity papers like passport.

The real issue is how to secure this huge Aadhar data and it is NOT beyond India’s competency


If you want to live like a REAL free person, then relocate to a bohemian island where there are no laws and you can walk naked with a dildo up the privacy of your asshole.   Any society with laws can only allow privacy subject to conditions. 


Only people who have something to hide or scared to share or make it public will prefer privacy as fundamental and absolute right.   

As India transforms to become transparent, we need to ensure privacy does not become a hindrance to hurt the watan.


Right to privacy should be first taught to benami media, which never  respects to privacy of people.— Chutney Mary journalists invade privacy and thrust their mikes into the faces of politicians 

In the garb of privacy, the extremists and black money holders may say that their accounts and other details are also coming under their fundamental right on privacy—like in Switzerland with OPM ( other people’s money ). They are not bound to disclose them and reveal the sources.

Vast majority of people are proud of their Aadhar cards-- they were more than willing to be identified by the system, only tiny miniscule ( including opposition Italian waitress’s poodle Congress politicians ) think they need to hide themselves from the system, why?


The Italian waitress and her half breed son go abroad frequently —they dont tell Indians where they went. Mind you, these are the kingpins of the term SAFFRON TERROR 

We must not allow misuse of  government welfare schemes.... Thousands of people  are having multiple PAN cards with different spellings of their own name and filings taxes as per their convenience

We can stem this only by linking with AADHAR.... Corrupt Indians people are opening bank accounts with different spellings of same name with different PAN cards as proofs..

In USA every citizen had the privacy as basic rights...but same time everything will hooked up to SSN.. In the United States, a Social Security number (SSN) is a nine-digit number issued to U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and temporary (working) residents..

The number is issued to an individual by the Social Security Administration, an independent agency of the United States government. 

Although its primary purpose is to track individuals for Social Security purposes, the Social Security number has become a de facto national identification number for taxation and other purposes. Employee, patient, student, and credit records are sometimes indexed by Social Security number.

The U.S. Armed Forces has used the Social Security number as an identification number for Army and Air Force personnel, Navy , Coast Guard and Marine Corps

Criminals use Social Security numbers to steal identities, allowing them to pillage resources, establish credit or to hijack credit cards, bank accounts or debit cards.

Now the US Military has started a new stringent  DoD identification number replacing the Social Security number.. The DoD identification number is a unique 10-digit number that is assigned to every person with a direct relationship with the department.

The new number also will be the service member's Geneva Convention identification number. Because cards will be replaced upon expiration, it will be approximately four years until all cards are replaced with the DoD ID number

Aadhaar  is a 12-digit unique identification number.. In February 2017 , six employees of telecom service provider Reliance Jio were arrested for the fraudulent use of fingerprints to activate and sell SIM cards. There were also reports that month about Axis Bank and other entities storing and using biometric data without authorisation.  

UNLESS LONG JAIL TERM ( FAST TRACK )  IS INVOLVED THIS WILL CONTINUE.

Aadhaar’s design is based on a centralised database called the Central Identities Data Repository that stores every individual’s demographic and biometric information. The aggregation of personal information in one centralised database makes it vulnerable to exploitation, making it a valuable target for hackers, states and identity thieves. This must be fire proofed.


Centralised databases are also vulnerable to errors and misuse by custodians of the database themselves.  My younger son could NOT link his Aadhar card to pan card because these PAN CARD bastards used initials for his middle name.

My driving license has AJITH instead of AJIT for the past two decades. I have stopped trying to change it after failing FOUR TIMES with a proper covering letter .   There must be a cell to nab these BASTARDS and give them long term jail time.

WHY DOES THE PAN CARD NOT HAVE AN EXPIRY DATE AND PERMANENT RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS ?  

THE COLLEGIUM MELORDS HAVE BURNT MIDNIGHT OILFOR CHAMIYA WHORE BEER BARS IN MUMBAI AND IPL—BUT THEY HAD NO TIME FOR “SHELL COMPANIES “.   

REASON ?   THESE MELORD JUDGES DON’T HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO UNDERSTAND SIMPLE ECONOMICS.     

YOU ASK THE QUINTESSENTIAL SOLI AND FALIS   " WHAT IS AADHAR CARD SEEDING " LIVE ON TV--SIT BACK AND WATCH THE FUN 

AADHAR CARD IS THE FIRST STEP TOWARDS HONORING THE CONSTITUTION WHERE “ALL INDIANS ARE SAME “ IRRESPECTIVE OF CASTE , CREED, RELIGION, GENDER, MINORITY -- BLAH FUCKIN’ BLAH

MNREGA WAGES TO DISADVANTAGES FOLKS VANISH INTO THIN AIR.  NOBODY WANTS TO STOP THIS CHEATING.

SOME MNREGA WORKERS WERE  CLEANING THE GUTTER OUTSIDE MY HOME , I SAW DRUNKS SITTING THERE DOING NOTHING.   

ONE MAN WAS A CRIPPLE—NAY-PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED.. 

ONE BUMPKIN DRUNK NOTED THAT MY HOME NAME WAS AKASH GANGA –AND HE SANG A BEAUTIFUL SONG.




 BUT HEY, I WOULD RATHER HAVE HIM CLEAN THE GUTTER.   BUT HEY, DRUNKS AND CRIPPLES JUST GET PAID A SMALL PITTANCE .  

AADHAR CARD LINKING TO PERSONAL BANK ACCOUNTS ( SEEDING ) CAN SAVE THESE UNFORTUNATE PEOPLE.

India must combat IDENTITY THEFT if we have to move towards digitalization.. Aadhar card is one way to do so.

FAKE AADHAR CARD AND FAKE PAN CARD ( MULTIPLE CARDS TOO ) MUST ENTAIL AT LEAST TEN YEAR JAIL TIME.

 Identity theft is the deliberate use of someone else's identity, usually as a method to gain a financial advantage or obtain credit and other benefits in the other person's name, and perhaps to the other person's disadvantage or loss

Desh drohis like rabidly anti-Modi Amartya Sen and his sidekick Jean Dreze have been running down Aadhar card


We don’t want them to teach Indians.  Amartya Sen does NOT know the basics of economics


AMARTYA SEN WITH A ROTHSCHILD WIFE HAS BEEN USED TO WHITEWASH DELIBERATE FAMINE IN INDIA CREATED BY WHITE GODS LIKE CP BROWN , SIR THOMAS MUNRO ETC TO DRIVE AWAY ENTIRE INDIAN FAMILIES ABROAD AS SLAVES TO WORK IN ROTHSCHILDs PLANTATIONS


THE SLAVERY OF INDIANS ABROAD WAS A SECRET TILL THIS BLOGSITE EXPOSED IT.    

Name of Colony        /   Number of Indian Indentured slaves
Mauritius             480,000
British Guiana      246,000
Trinidad               145,000
Jamaica                39,000
Grenada            4,000
St Lucia            5,100
Natal               154,000
St Kitts            500
St Vincent        2,600
Reunion            28,000
Surinam            36,000
Fiji                   65,000
East Africa       39,000
Seychelles        9,000
Others              47,000

Total               1,300,200

Never in the history of mankind has there been a saga of such greed and injustice-- where more than 1.3 million innocent humans were duped whole sale , given a life sentence , dumped in far flung corners of the planet and forgotten for ever.

TODAY WIKIPEDIA QUOTES THE SAME FIGURES





Seeding allows organisations to feed Aadhaar numbers into their own databases, allowing them to uniquely identify beneficiaries or customers. The presence of one unique number for every individual across multiple public and private databases makes the convergence of this information easier.

The legal framework does not prohibit this, and the safeguards for the security of these parallel databases are scant.

INDIA IS IN REALITY THE ONLY HEALTHY MAJOR ECONOMY ON THE PLANET.    WE NEED TO PROJECT THE REALGDP POWER AND HEALTHY ECONOMIC GROWTH OF INDIA. 

WE NEED TO FACTOR IN SMALL SCALE AND FAMILY BASED COTTAGE INDUSTRIES INTO GDP FRAMEWORK ( WHICH NOBEL PRIZE WINNER KAILASH SATYARTHI TRIED TO KILL).

ALICE IN WONDERLAND PM MODI IS STILL HUGGING THIS DESH DROHI AND GIVING HIM HAJAAR  PAPPI.   SUCH IS MODIs AWARENESS OF GLOBAL INTRIGUE.

NO 1 RANK WORLD ECONOMY USA IS 20 TRILLION USD IN DEBT

JEW OBAMA FAILED TO MENTION THIS HUMONGOUS DEBT IN ANY OF HIS SOTU ADDRESSES. ONLY DONALD TRUMP POINTED THIS OUT

Check the top left hand corner of the link below


NO 2 RANK WORLD ECONOMY CHINA IS A BUBBLE WITHIN A BUBBLE

Why does it take a blogger to expose China . 

Reason ?    

Our think tanks have DIMWITS with SHIT FOR BRAINS





IF    IF    IF    biometrics are combined with a universal identifier like Aadhaar and subsequently compromised, an identity thief can instantly gain access to multiple services, while simultaneously preventing the individual from obtaining legitimate benefits she might be entitled to.

WELL IF MY AUNTY HAD BALLS SHE WOULD BE MY UNCLE.


LONG TERM JAIL FOR CRIMINALS WHO FUCK AROUND WITH AADHAR CARD ( MINIMUM TEN YEARS )  IS A MUST TO PREVENT FRAUD AND SCAMS

AADHAR CARD MUST HAVE AN EXPIRY DATE.   WITH EVERY RENEWAL ENSURE BIOMETRICS ARE CHECKED AGAIN..    POLICE MUST BE STANDBY TO ARREST PEOPLE WITH FAKE BIOMETRICS AND FAKE AADHAR CARDS


ANYBODY HAVING MULTIPLE AADHAR CARDS CAN BE CAUGHT ON THE BASIS OF HIS PHOTO AND BIOMETRICS.


Why was tinted glasses ( privacy ) removed from Indian vehicles on roads?    

There is a reason , right ?  

We don’t need Judges to save India.     India will be saved by ELECTED executive


Passengers passing through US airports know the meaning of PRIVACY when the security of the nation is under threat.  Is checking of baggage of a passengers violation of human rights and privacy rights?  How many of you would like to board a plane where its bags are not checked ?   Why have an alcometer test for the pilot ? 


Can a Muslim woman refuse to show her face at any airport under her right to privacy ?

A level headed balance needs to be maintained between the right to privacy and the right of the state to impose reasonable restrictions on it for legitimate aims such as national security, prevention and investigation of crimes and distribution of welfare resources.

Let this balance be provided by the ELECTED LAW MAKERS.   

We don’t trust the judiciary who have left their own cases pending for three decades.  

They have NOT cared for the undertrails .   

Just shows their sense of commitment to the WATAN and accountability.



The judges call for privacy.    Yet they encourage “bravehearts” to show their YUCK private parts at midnight on public roads.

Today you go to any posh gym in India women are showing their camel toes -- some of them non-feminine , fat , ugly  and stinking of PIG sorpotel.    I guess their mothers were whores.


Such ABSOLUTE PRIVACY AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT verdicts are excellent for mature and honest societies where honesty prevails far and wide.  Right now corruption ridden India cannot be harnessed by such IMMATURE laws-- made with ulterior motive.

After graduation, Lalu got a job as clerk in Bihar Veterinary College, Patna where his elder brother  worked as a peon.   See  how many thousands of crores he is worth today.

Kumaari Mayawati wore broken sandak chappals and cheap sarees as a young woman—check out how much she is worth today .

Sreeshant was black bagged.



 Mohammad Shahabuddin was not— as police did not have the balls !

Right now PM Modi is doing a GOOD  JOB giving us a governance free from corruption-- which will eradicate evils in society rape ,murders, crimes, scams etc..  

We need a ruler with a HEAVY STICK in his hand.

WHOLE OF YESTERDAY BENAMI MEDIA WERE CELEBRATING SHOUTING AND RUNNING FLASHING FOOTERS  " HOMOSEXUALS HAVE  FINALLY BEEN FREED "

NOT ONE MAIN STREAM MEDIA HAD THE BALLS TO SUPPORT TRUMP AGAINST ROTHSCHILDs CANDIDATE HILLARY-- THEY WILL LOSE THEIR JOBS WITHIN THE HOUR 

I DARE ANY JOURNALIST TO DECLARE " I DONT SUPPORT HOMOSEXUALITY" AND HE/ SHE WILL LOSE HER JOB WITHIN THE HOUR.  

Below: Sharing the PIG sorpotel 

YOU SEE THESE HOMOSEXUALS ( 99.5% ARE PEDOPHILES ) ARE THE SALT  --NAY -- BOUNTY OF THIS PLANET, RIGHT ?


ALL THOSE WHO THINK THAT COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS FREE OF CORRUPTION-PLEASE RAISE YOUR HANDS

GOOD !

SOME LAWYERS AND COURT CLERKS HAVE BLOWN THE WHISTLE –


IF KARNAN  CAN GO TO JAIL ( SENT BY HIS OWN COLLEAGUES ) —THERE ARE MANY MORE MELORDS  IN LINE -- THEY WILL BE SENT TO JAIL BY THE MODI GOVT


Nation building is done in FULL public view but, HEY scams , crimes and separatist activities must get Melord afforded PRIVACY LAW protection.  

This nonsense can only be a grand scheme of foreign desh drohis.    We know which all Indians  are  involved in this grand scheme 


The same Melords will support ZIONIST multinational insurance companies when they did into a man’s private past to check out  past ailments  before issuing a policy!


Below: Sorry Bruce baby-- this statement is applicable only to GOOD PEOPLE who are assets for the nation-- 

 This shall NOT apply to desh drohis, illegal immigrants  , criminals and separatists who point a foreign gun against Bharatmata . 

 "We the people" who are above the constitution , will CRUSH these BASTARDS and all those bastards within the system who support them.


Below: The collegium Melords are so full of themselves that will fail to understand the wisdom of Phil Crane 


In todays world only criminals keep privacy ( for vested interests ) , for all others who are honest their life is open to all

Past corrupt Congress politicians , terrorists , scammers and criminals  don't want to be caught.  So in the name of privacy they oppose Aadhar

In the name of privacy all MAJOR  crimes are committed in India and even the court lets them off for want of evidence.   Even in jail people enjoy a luxurious life in front of camera—BINDAASS 


The collegium judiciary has given desh drohis the RIGHT TO HIDE in the name of PRIVACY.

Gandhi gave us abject SLAVERY in the name of AHIMSA .


But hey –  Gandhi was OK with SELECTIVE AHIMSA of killing Germans who have done NO harm to Bharatmata.  

Gandhi gave protection to the white invader who was robbing Bharatmata blind.



JUDGES HAVE NO RIGHT UNDER THE CONSTITUTION TO CREATE LAWS AND AS SUCH EVERY LAW MADE BY JUDICIARY SINCE INDEPENDENCE  IS AUTOMATICALLY NULL AND VOID –  UNLESS ENDORSED BY THE ELECTED LEGISLATURE .  

ABOVE IS A SOLEMN DECLARATION BY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WHO KNOWS AND UNDERSTANDS THE CONSTITUTION-- AND HAS THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO APPLY BODMAS

This privacy judgment is a SEVERE blow to Aadhaar as the Centre now has to CONVINCE the Supreme court  that forcing citizens to give a sample of their fingerprints and their iris scan does not violate privacy—cries the Benami desh drohi media and their foreign masters

SORRY ELECTED EXECUTIVE DOES NOT HAVE TO CONVINCE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ANYTHING. 

The NEW Attorney general K K Venugopal, who had argued that right to privacy cannot be a fundamental right, welcomed the SC decision.

What is this fellow worth ?

Hey Venu baby—are you coming or going ?   BATAO NAAH ?


The apex court's nine-judge bench overruled previous judgments on the issue- an eight-judge bench judgment in the MP Sharma case and a six-judge bench judgment in Kharak Singh case, both of which had ruled that privacy is not a fundamental right

The question about the constitutional status of right to privacy arose in a bunch of petitions, led by retired HC judge KS Puttaswamy, which in 2012, challenged the UPA government's decision to introduce the biometric data-enabled Aadhaar ID for citizens.  

The petitioners included first Chairperson of National Commission for Protection of Child Rights and Magsaysay awardee Shantha Sinha

WE DON’T CARE FOR MAGSAYSAY AWARD WINNERS—ESPECIALLY JNU STUDENTS LIKE SHANTA BABY !

Read all 11 parts --

FOREIGN MEDIA IS CELEBRATING— THEY THINK INDIA WILL NOW BCOME A NATION OF HOMOSEXUALS

INDIA HAS THE LEAST HOMOSEXUALS BY “PERCENTAGE “ ON THIS PLANET—DUE T OUR GOTRA SYSTEM .  WHATEVER LITTLE WE HAVE ARE FOREIGN INVADER TAINTED BLOOD.

The nine judges, through six concurring opinions held that privacy is a constitutionally protected right that emerges from the right to life and liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the constitution, which is inseparable from the right to live with dignity.

Article 21 in The Constitution Of India :--
21. Protection of life and personal liberty No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law

Article 21 prohibits the deprivation of the above rights EXCEPT ACCORDING TO  A PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED BY LAW.   Read the UPPER CASE part of this sentence a Zillion times

WE KNOW WHO OUR LAWMAKERS ARE—WE ELECT THEM.

OUR JUDGES ARE NOT ELECTED – NOR CAN THEY CREATE ANY LAWS

THIS LAW RESTS WITH LAWMAKERS –NOT WITH “LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES

Article 21 can only be claimed when a person is deprived of his “life” or “personal liberty” by the “State” as defined in Article 12.


Article 21 applies to natural persons. The right is available to every person and  citizen . 

Fundamental Rights are the basic rights of the people and the charter of rights contained in Part III of Constitution of India.   It guarantees civil liberties such that all Indians can lead their lives in peace and harmony as citizens of India.

SORRY FOREIGN DESH DROHIS— 

NO FOREIGNER OR ALIEN CAN CLAIM THIS RIGHT – SO STOP YOUR PROPAGANDA ON TV AND MAIN STREAM MEDIA

Part-III of the Indian constitution from article 12 to 32, contains fundamental rights.
These include individual rights common to most liberal democracies, such as equality before law, freedom of speech and expression, religious and cultural freedom and peaceful assembly, freedom to practice religion, and the right to constitutional remedies for the protection of civil rights by means of writs such as habeas corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition,  Certiorari and Quo Warranto.

Violation of these rights result in punishments as prescribed in the Indian Penal Code or other special laws, subject to discretion of the judiciary. The Fundamental Rights are defined as basic human freedoms that every Indian citizen has the right to enjoy for a proper and harmonious development of personality. These rights universally apply to all citizens, irrespective of race, place of birth, religion, caste or gender.

Aliens (persons who are not citizens) are only considered in matters like equality before law. REPEAT – ONLY IN MATTERS OF  “EQUALITY “ BEFORE LAW.  

They are enforceable by the courts, subject to  restrictions.  REPEAT— SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS

READ THE UPPERCASE PARTS OF THE TWO SENTENCES ABOVE A TRILLION TIMES


24th constitutional amendment introduced a new Article 13(4) enabling Parliament to legislate on the subjects of Part III of the constitution using its constituent powers per Article 368 (1)

Israel is a country which opens its citizenship for all Jews on the earth. The Law of Return grants all Jews the right to immigrate to Israel and almost automatically Israeli citizenship upon arrival in Israel. In 1970s the law of Return was expanded to grant the same rights to the spouse if the Jew, the children of a Jew and their spouses, and he grandchildren of a Jew and their spouses, provided that the Jew did not practice any other religion other than Judaism willingly.

In Indian laws, a foreign national will not be entitled to the same constitutional rights as a citizen of a country will have. 

Looking at the history of India, the framers of the constitution found it better to keep a check on the Rights and privileges provided to the foreigners. The main motive behind such a step is to stop the illegal activities by the infiltrators or trespassers, and to secure the sovereignty of the nation. 

Although they are provided with the basic human rights, which they also deserve which are also mentioned in Universal Declaration of Human Rights and belongto every person irrespective of their nationality, race, caste or sex, being a non-citizen of the country, they are deprived of certain rights, which are exclusively reserved for the citizens of the country

WE HAVE A CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA ( JS KHEHAR )  WHO IS HELLBENT ON ALLOWING FOREIGN LAWYERS TO PRACTICE IN INDIA.

I DON’T WANT TO DISGRACE HIM FURTHER BY QUOTING THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION

Aliens  cannot hold any constitutional posts of the country, like The President, Vice-President, Governor, ministers, etc

HULLO ITALIAN WAITRESS HULLOOOO-


THIS ALIEN WOMAN TRIED TO BE PM WITH SUPPORT FROM JUDICIARY AND MEDIA 
Rights given to the foreign nationals, such as right to equality before law, right to  protection of life and personal liberty, are those rights which every ’person’ deserve, irrespective of his nationality and where he/she is residing, as in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

In Indian Constitution, citizenship is dealt from article 5 to article 11, and also the Citizenship Act, 1955, has been enacted, which constitutes the exhaustive laws relating to the citizenship of India. 

Although there are various variations in Indian laws guiding any person's citizenship, but largely, India follow the concept of jus sanguinis, that is citizenship by right of blood, as opposed to jus soli.

There are two concepts that are followed in granting citizenship to any individual:-
1- Jus soli
2- Jus sanguinis

These principles are general employed for the determination of citizenship. 

Jus soli is the concept in which, citizenship is determined by the place of birth and on the other hand jus sanguinis is the concept in which the citizenship or nationality is given based on the fact that where had your parents or your ancestors reside so a child born to Nigerian parents inside the Indian premises is Indian by the concept of jus soli, but is of Nigerian nationality by jus sanguinis concept.

Article 19 of the Constitution of India provides for 6 basic fundamental rights, which is provided to each and every citizen of the country. 

The foreigners are kept secluded from these 6 fundamental rights, which means, they do not have right to:---
1- Freedom of speech and expression
2- Assemble peacefully and without arms
3- Form associations or unions
4- Move freely through the territory of India
5- To reside and settle in any part of India
6- Practice any profession or to carry any occupation, trade or business.

PLUS MANY OTHERS DEPENDING ON THE SITUATION— THIS IS THE PREROGATIVE OF THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE – NOT A COLLEGIUM LOSER LAWYER TURNED JUDGE

Along with all these rights, the foreigners are also secluded from the right to vote.

The freedom of speech and expression is a right, which every person should be entitled to, but the Indian Constitution does not give this right to foreigners.

Although they have their say in case of judicial proceedings going against them, but they cannot participate in political debate, or criticize the government, because when they do not have the power to form the government, they also do not have the freedom to criticize the government.

All these rights given in Article 19 of the constitution of India form the core rights which are only granted to the citizens of the country.

If democracy means government of the people, by the people, it is obvious, that every citizen must be entitled to participate in the democratic process and in order to enable him to intelligently exercise his right of making a choice, free and general discussion on public matters is absolute essential— aliens shall LAY OFF !

Only those people, who are the citizens of the country, and are a part of the democratic setup, can have the right to debate or have their say in any democratic process.

Jew Noam Chomsky – FUCK OFF !



A foreigner cannot claim right ‘reside and settle in any part of the country’.     The government has thus the unrestricted right to expel a foreigner  –  THIS RIGHT BELONGS TO THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE NOT A LOSER LAWYER TURNED COLLEGIUM JUDGE

Read the UC words of the para above a billion times.


The Right to form associations given in the article 19(1) (c), of the constitution, is also not provided to the foreigners.   The main motive behind providing this right to our citizens, is to enable them to form political parties, without which it is an impossible task to run a democratic setup of government, especially that of the parliamentary type.

If this right to form associations is given to foreigners as well, this would amount to the meaning that they are equally rightful in forming political parties and participate in our political and democratic setup.

This move will allow the non-citizens to form political parties in India, and contest elections, thereby, violating the principles for eligibility criteria as given in Part 5 for union, and in part 6 for states of the constitution , and will also pose a threat to the sovereignty of the nation.

In Indian context, the Indian Constitution which deals with the fundamental rights in its part 3, gives every citizen 6 basic fundamental rights, which are only for its citizens.

However , except for article 15,16, 19,29 and 30, and the right to vote and constitutional posts, every right given in the part 3 of the constitution of India is available to the noncitizens, or is available to every ‘person’, irrespective of his/her nationality, and not specifically to the citizens.

On one hand, the Indian Constitution restricts the non-citizens from enjoying certain rights; on the other hand, they welcome them by extending to them all the human rights that they deserve.

Some  fundamental rights are those claims, which can be made only by the itizens of the country and not by the foreigners or the non-citizens. They have been reserved exclusively for the Indians and may have unwanted consequences if extended to foreigners

In the constitutions of almost ALL developed democracies, the word “citizen” appears late in the text, never in the first paragraph.    

We Indians are like cats who fell in HOT water ( slavery ) and we are circumspect with COLD water today

The major exception to this is the Indian Constitution. Here, unlike all others, the term “citizen” makes its appearance right there in the first sentence, that is, in the Preamble itself.

Like the American Constitution ours too begins with the ringing words, “We the People….”, but that is where the similarity ends. While the word “citizen” appears in our Constitution before the first sentence is over, one has to wait longer in the American book for this word to make an entry.

IT IS A SHAME THAT ADMIRAL LN RAMDASs DAUGHTER MARRIED A PAKISTANI MAN —YET HE WAS MADE NAVAL CHIEF OF STAFF.



IT IS ANOTHER MATTER THAT HE WAS NOT PRIVY TO THE NUCLEAR SECRETS OF THE NAVY— JUST LIKE GEORGE FERNANDES WAS NOT PRIVY TO THE NATIONS SECRETS AS A DEFENCE MINISTER .

TWO PRIME MINISTERs OF INDIA WERE  IN THE SAME “UNTRUSTWORTHY BUCKET “ TOO.     THERE IS A CORE BUNCH OF HARDCORE  DESH BHAKTS TO TAKE CARE OF THIS

THE ELECTED LAW MAKERS WILL ENDORSE ANY JUDGMENTS BY COLLEGIUM JUDGES AND NOT VICE VERSA— 

INDIAN MEIN SAALA ULTA CHAL RAHA HAI! 

NAHIN CHALEGA— SAYS “ WE THE PEOPLE “  WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION !

The lawmakers MUST make constitutional amendments to Part III of the constitution—to PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY OF THE WATAN AND TO PRESERVE DHARMA

Read the yellow  UC words in the para above a million times

In case of fundamental rights violation, Supreme court of India can be approached directly for ultimate justice per Article 32.    

The Rights have their origins in many sources, including England's Bill of Rights, the United States Bill of Rights and France's Declaration of the Rights of Man.

Everyone has the right to life, liberty --and the security of person. TO PROVIDE THIS SECURITY ( TO PEOPLE AND THE WATAN ) THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE WILL DO ITS DUTIES AS DEEMED FIT-   THEY DONT NEED ADVISE FROM LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES 

As human rights can only attach to living beings, one might expect the right to life itself to be in some sense primary, since none of the other rights would have any value or utility without it.  

But hey, in India BHARATMATA ( watan ) has her rights . We the people will sacrifice our lives for this if need be.  


WE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION , DON’T CARE FOR PAST JUDGEMENT MADE BY COLLEGIUM MELORDS.     

ALL THESE MINDLESS  JUDGEMENTS DEVOID OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND CONTEXT ARE FIT ONLY TO BE BURNT. 

ANY JUDGEMENT WHICH HURTS THE WATAN AND GOOD CITIZENS IS NULL AND VOID. 

WE WANT OUR CHILDREN TO BE FREE FROM HOMOSEXUALS -  99.5% OF WHOM ARE PEDOPHILES


WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT AFFORD “REPUTATION”TO ANY DESH DROHI OR TRAITOR 
What Art. 21 insists is that  deprivation ( of life or personal liberty) ought to be according to procedure established by law which must be fair, just and reasonable.

We the people will not allow an alien desh drohi like Ajmal Kasab to be protected by Article 21

The conferment of a person, as a citizen of India, is governed by Articles 5 to 11 (Part II) of the Constitution of India. Article 9 of Indian Constitution says that a person who voluntarily acquires citizenship of any other country is no longer an Indian citizen. 

Also, according to The Passports Act, a person has to surrender his/her Indian passport and vote card and other Indian ID cards must not use after other country citizenship. It is a punishable offence if the person fails to surrender the passport. Indian nationality law largely follows the jus sanguinis (citizenship by right of blood) as opposed to the jus soli (citizenship by right of birth within the territory). 

The President of India is termed the first Citizen of India. It is generally difficult to have dual citizenship of India and another country, due to the provisions for loss of Indian nationality when an Indian national naturalizes in another country (see "Loss of citizenship" above), and the requirement to renounce one's existing citizenships when naturalizing in India (see "Naturalization" above).

We have a right against NOISE POLLUTION .   Majority of India is woken up at 0445 hrs in the morning by ear shattering AZAN calls from mosques which affect our REM sleep.  

We will NOT allow judges to use Article 21 selectively like Gandhi’s AHIMSA

SO SO SO-- Dera chief Ram Rahim molested adult women ?   What about Gandhi who slept nude with young girls –some with stigma of incest ?


Hey collegium Melords—have you applied Article 21 to UNTERTRIALS rotting in jail without trial for decades?

Giving the widest interpretation to Art 21, the following rights as fundamental rights within the scope of Art. 21:---
• Right to education
• Right to health
• Right to environment
• Right to shelter
• Right to privacy
• Right to speedy trial
• Right of the prisoners
• Right to legal aid
• Right against cruel and unusual punishment
• Right not to be subjected to bonded labour
• Right to travel abroad
• Right against solitary confinement
• Right against handcuffing

THERE IS NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT GIVEN TO  HOMOSEXUAL TO INSERT HIS SYPHILITIC PRICK INTO THE WEE SHIT HOLE OF HIS NEIGHBOURS SON—USING PRIVACY LAWS



The seven fundamental rights recognized by the Indian constitution are:--

Right to equality: Which includes equality before law, prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, gender or place of birth, and equality of opportunity in matters of employment, abolition of untouchability and abolition of titles. Right to equality is provided from Article 14 to Article 18 of Indian constitution.

Right to freedom: Which includes freedom of speech and expression, assembly, association or union or cooperatives, movement, residence, and right to practice any profession or occupation, right to life and liberty, protection in respect to conviction in offences and protection against arrest and detention in certain cases. Right to freedom is provided from Article 19 to 22 of constitution.

Right against exploitation: Which prohibits all forms of forced labour, child labour and traffic of human beings. It is provided under Articles 23 and 24 of Indian constitution.

Right to freedom of religion: Which includes freedom of conscience and free profession, practice, and propagation of religion, freedom to manage religious affairs, freedom from certain taxes and freedom from religious instructions in certain educational institutes. Article 25 to 28 enumerates the right to freedom of religion.

Cultural and Educational rights: Preserve the right of any section of citizens to conserve their culture, language or script, and right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. Article 29 and Article 30 of Indian constitution provides for cultural and educational rights.

Right to constitutional remedies: Which is present for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. It is provided under Article 32 to 35 of Indian constitution.

Right to Privacy: Which is an intrinsic part of Article 21 that protects life and liberty of the citizens.

OUR BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL , JUST CANT APPLY BODMAS -- ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND SHATTERING EARDRUMS WITH AZAN ON LOUDSPEAKER AT 5 AM


"Right to Privacy is an integral part of Right to Life and Personal Liberty guaranteed in Article 21 of the Constitution," the SC's nine- member  MELORD  bench ruled unanimously.


WITHOUT AADHAR AND DIGITALISATION ( TO FACTOR IN FAMILY BASED COTTAGE INDUSTRIES IN GDP )  INDIA CANNOT BECOME THE PLANET NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 16 YEARS .  


WHY HAVE I STARTED THIS BLOGSITE ?

SO THAT DESH DROHIS WONT BE ABLE TO HIJACK THE SYSTEM-  IN FUTURE

IN WHICH COUNTRY ON THIS PLANET CAN POLICE TORTURE AN ARMY COLONEL AND KEEP HIM IN JAIL FOR NINE YEARS WITHOUT TRIAL   ?

KYA HO RAHA HAI ?

IF WE DO A NARCO TEST ON SHINDE/ DIGGY/ CHID/ WAITRESS/ KHURSHID/ SLIMY MANI / ANTONY  – ALL THE “ PUROHIT SAFFRON TERROR “ CONSPIRACY BEANS WILL SPILL OUT 


In February 27, 2012, the “bottom dregs of the school cerebral barrel “—the supreme court Melords ordered the elected executive to interlink the rivers of India and KILL Bharatama.

The Supreme court gave a dead line.  

These “loser lawyers turned judges” think that rivers are a gutters to dump water into the sea.

Recently the Melords gave a week deadline to the state govt to stop frothing of lakes.  These melords have non-technical brains.  Yet they think they are the salt nay bounty of the watan.

These Melords ( yeah include all the Falis and Solis ) will get a reality harsh check if they participate in a IQ test LIVE on TV with some 14 year old illiterate chaiwalla boys off Mumbai or Calcutta



GHADI GHADI you can hear Melords ordering that stupid woman ( water resources minister ) to clean up Ganga.

This is the sorry state of India

The nine-judge bench unanimously ruled that privacy is a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution.   The bench, headed by Chief Justice of India J S Khehar, comprised of Justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde, R K Agrawal, R F Nariman, A M Sapre, D Y Chandrachud, S K Kaul and S Abdul Nazeer.

SORRY— “WE THE PEOPLE” DO NOT AGREE WITH THIS

Sweden was the first country in the world to give each citizen a personal identification number which must be used in essentially every interaction with the State. Every Swede memorises the number as a child.

The Modi Govt has made a rule that  Aadhaar number is mandatory for filing income tax returns.   

The elected executive is within their rights as per the Indian constitution whether the COLLEGIUM JUDICAY  agrees or not.  If people did NOT avoid taxes and launder money there was no need for the govt to place filters .

It took a blogger to pen a 33 part series on SHELL COMPANIES to wake up the govt.    It will be impossible to wake up the Judiciary .  They pretend to sleep . It is NOT worth waking these judges up—many of whom live far beyond their known sources of income. 

Many of these Melords have been careless while on their foreign jaunts

The government has defended the move saying it was needed to curb black money as there were instances of people procuring multiple PAN cards to divert funds to shell companies.   

“WE THE PEOPLE” WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION WARN THE JUDICIARY—  DO NOT PUT ROAD BLOCKS IN FRONT OF PM MODI WHO IS TRYING TO TAKE INDIA FORWARD .  

WE THE PEOPLE ARE NOT FOOLS.

Privacy is a right of an individual.  However,  privacy is protecting a lot of people not paying taxes.. these shameless tax evading creatures hide behind such noble fundamental rights.

The absolute right to privacy is non-existent in today’s modern world.   It does NOT exist anywhere on this planet—I can say this after travelling this planet for 4 decades . I am NOT a frog in the well like our Collegium Melords

We the people ask –
“WHY IS FOREIGN MEDIA SO MUCH INTERESTED IN DECLARING THAT RIGHT TO PRIVACY RULING HAS MADE SEC 377 ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY INVALID ?”

The right to privacy has to be determined on a case-by-case basis. 

We the people do not accept such a SWEEPING JUDGEMENT made by COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY which is unconstitutional

There are more than 1.17 billion Aadhaar holders in the country.

Privacy was not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution . The people of India have no absolute right to claim it.  

If this has to be exlicit, it must be done by the ELECTED LAW MAKERS and not the UNCONSTITUTIONAL COLLEGIUM  LAW INTERPRETERS

The inclusion or exclusion of fundamental rights is only the proviso of Parliament… Here, the judiciary is taking over the functions of Parliament.  Hey, let them do it - but WE THE PEOPLE declare it NULL AND VOID

On the ship the COOK cant decide –the Captain decides.  Same way the ELECTED LAW MAKERS must make laws –not the cooks –nay—Judges

The framers of the Constitution did not intend to make privacy a fundamental right.

No case should be decided without a reference to facts. There are no facts in the ruling of August 24 2017—these Judges used to being so cocky in making new laws via PIL route  ( extreme Judicial overreach ) –has thrown all accountability to the winds.

The top court rejected the Centre's vehement contention that there was no general or fundamental right to privacy under the Constitution.

Just who the hell are these Judges.    

Are they the only ones who can read and write in this nation ?  In this internet age we all can read and interpret the constitution


The right to individual privacy "intrinsic" and fundamental to dignified human existence under the country's constitution, but it is definitely NOT absolute—as the Melords say

WE THE PEOPLE ASK THESE MELORDS-
“ WHY HAVE YOU ALLOWED THE NAXAL RED CORRIDOR TO OCCUPY 25% OF THE WATAN?”

WE KNOW WHY !

WHEN FOREIGN FORCES DEPRIVED THE TRIBALS OF RIGHT TO CLEAN DRINKING WATER –WHAT WERE THESE MELORDS DOING?

IS THIS MORE IMPORTANT –OR THE RIGHT TO DANCE BY SOME WHORES IN SOME MUMBAI CHAMIYA BEER BARS ?



IN CASE WAR BREAKS OUT BETWEEN CHINA AND INDIA— MARK MY WORDS—  WE THE PEOPLE WILL CATCH ALL INDIAN COMMIES WHO HANG A PICTURE  OF MAO IN THEIR HOMES OR PARTY OFFICES—AND TREAT THEM AS TRAITORS


"None can publish anything concerning the above matters without his consent -- whether truthful or otherwise and whether laudatory or critical.   If he does so, he would be violating the right to privacy of the person concerned and would be liable in an action for damages," the Supreme Court stated in its judgement.

BY ASKING THAT TRUTH BE HIDDEN, ARE THESE MELORDS PROTECTING BHARATMATA ?    WHAT A FUCKIN' JOKE !!!!!!!!

THE ONLY THING I CAN FIGURE OUT IS THAT THESE PATHETIC MELORDS WANT TO BE KINGMAKERS IN INDIA 

SORRY--WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW "LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES" TO BE KINGMAKERS 

We the people will NOT allow individual DESH DROHI  interests to prevail over legitimate concerns of the watan—like preventing and investigating crime/ terrorism  and preserving the rights of the unfortunate children of Bharatmata. 

WE WANT THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE TO SAVE BHARATMATA— NOT THESE BOTTOM DREGS OF THESE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL

Of course we agree that the central Govt must place a robust regime for data protection. Or China will win a war by HACKING without firing a bullet


The right to life of millions of poor in the country through clean water , nutritious food, affordable shelter and welfare measures was far more important than privacy concerns raised by the crooks and foreign controlled traitors of the elite class.

WE WANT EVERY MULTINATIONAL COMPANY TO HAVE A POLICY STATEMENT ON “SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

WHY DID THE SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL TAKE FOREIGN FUNDS FOR SEVERAL YEARS ?  

WE KNOW WHAT THESE FOREIGN FUNDS WERE USED FOR !   WE KNOW THE JUDGES WHO DIPPED INTO THESE FOREIGN FUNDS MERRILY.

FOREIGN FORCES FUNDED THESE SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL-TO SAVE BHARATMATA ?

OH YEAH ?

Benami Media darling Finance Minister Arun Jaitley welcomed SC's verdict on Privacy:
He spAke--

“Supreme Court verdict on privacy a positive development. Government welcomes Supreme Court's judgment, declaring privacy as a fundamental right”

HULLO 2 IN 1 ARUN JAITLEY,  WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE !   

WE SAW YOU WITH BARKHA DUTT ON NDTV SPONSORING HOMOSEXUALITY.

In sheer contrast Ravi Shankar Prasad said “  Aadhaar has shown its utility in a very short span of time. It is completely safe and secure. The Aadhaar Act puts in place a tough ecosystem for disclosure of individual data. In the last 3 years, we have saved close to 57,000 crore rupees that earlier used to go to middlemen. The whole world appreciates the technological marvel that is Aadhaar. The system works on the principle of minimum information, maximum us .. Even a fundamental Right to Privacy has limitations that need to be identified on a case-to-case basis.“

Here is what an Italian HALF BREED said- also known as AKKAL KA DUSHMAN  " Welcome the SC verdict upholding Right to Privacy as an intrinsic part of individual's liberty, freedom & dignity. A victory for every Indian. SC's decision marks a major blow to fascist forces. A sound rejection of the BJP's ideology of suppression through surveillance”

"Sexual orientation is an essential attribute of privacy. Discrimination against an individual on the basis of sexual orientation is deeply offensive to the dignity and self-worth of the individual. Equality demands that the sexual orientation of each individual in society must be protected on an even platform. The right to privacy and the protection of sexual orientation lies at the core of the fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution," said Justice Chandrachud.


Hey Chandrachud star kid baby-nay— Melord. We know you and your father CJI Chandrachud—the longest serving CJI of India.   Let homosexuals do their dirty thingy.  They can eat each other shit mixed with PIG SORPOTEL for all we care . We the people will NOT allow them to molest children. 99.5% homosexuals are pedophiles 


Have you noticed the cosy nexus between the JNU commie professors and the Benami anti-Hindu commie Indian media?

Same way have you noticed that the Indian commie media and the COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY work in tandem as a MUTUAL ADMIRATION SOCIETY

Both the Melords and the media have a set of favourite GURUS.    

These gurus are the darlings of Rothschild’s media .   They are invited to give speeches at UN and Freemason International seminars.

Their shit don’t smell.

Just a couple of hours ago I saw a TV interview between SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV and Zakka Jacob of CNN-IBN.

Zakka baby was treating Vasudev baby as the PLANETs  No 1 EXPERT ON CLIMATE AND WATER RESOURCES

You see Sadguru Jaggi Vasudev has planted millions of trees in arid Tamil Nadu whose ground water has retreated to a new low.  

He need to justify why he planted trees without environmental clearance.  He should have been fined-nay-jailed.

As it is our NGTs knowledge of environment is purely pedestrian .  I can put the pathetic NGT to a 100 basic question test LIVE on TV and they will score ZERO marks—only basic questions.

Sadhuru Jaggi Vasudev has planted 27 million trees far and he plans to plant 114 million trees.


THIS FELLOW SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV IS A “FROG IN THE WELL”.    HE HAS  NO FUCKIN’ IDEA OF HOW THE CLIMATE SYSTEM WORKS. 

HE HAS NO IDEA OF WHY KERALA GETS AN ABUNDANCE OF RAIN WHILE TAMIL NADU GETS NO RAIN .   THIS FELLOW THINKS PLANTING TREES CAN BRING IN RAIN LIKE A MAGNET. 

SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV HAS NO IDEA OF THE TERM “TRANSPIRATION” GROUNDWATER WATER LOSSES CAUSED BY TREES.

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL CAN JUDGE A THOUSAND SUCH BULLSHIT SADURUS WHEN IT COMES TO THE ENVIRONMENT. 

Read all 6 parts of the post below-

In the post below , I make two huge statements which made people in Norway and Chile fall into  a dead faint.

“I WILL BRING SNOW TO NORWAY”

“I HAVE BROUGHT RAIN TO ATACAMA DESERT”

MY RADIO OFFICER DELETED A SENTENCE IN MY MESSAGE TO THE NORWEGIAN DIRECTOR   “ TELL YOU DAUGHTERS TO KEEP HOPE IN THEIR SOULS AND  SOAP IN THEIR HOLES”

The radio officer explained that he know that Captain did NOT mean to put that damning sentence – and Captain would have expected him to remove it before transmission


In Chile my ship has cement in BULK .  If this cement got wet , the ship would have to be thrown away like a huge useless rock.

The pilot did not know why Valparaiso got abundant rain while Antofagasta just a thousand kilometers south,  got no rain at all.

 SO SO SO --SADGURU BABY--  LISTEN UP--
RAIN BROUGHT A MASSIVE JUNGLE INTO AMAZON .  
PLANTING TREES DID NOT BRING RAIN TO AMAZON 






http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sailor-opts-for-sex-change-faces-navy-axe/articleshow/60250793.cms

BEWARE

SUCH TRANSGENDERS WHO SEEK SEX CHANGE ARE HIGHLY UNSTABLE CHARACTERS WHO HAVE ZERO LOYALTIES DUE TO THEIR HORMONE RUSHES

CHELSEA MANNING WAS THE FOUNTAIN HEAD OF WIKILEAKS

THIS US SOLDIER ( DRESSED AS A MAN ) LEAKED DAMNING CLASSIFIED DATA

USA HAD TO EVACUATE ALL CRYPTO JEWS AND THEIR FAMILIES FROM IRAQ --AS THEIR ADDRESSES AND PHOTOS WERE LEAKED BY CHELSEA MANNING

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Manning

FOREIGN SPIES GET DATA FROM SUCH PANSIES WHO NEED ANAL SEX.  THEY ARE MALE HONEYPOTS
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/01/of-honey-traps-and-pots-capt-ajit.html

WE WILL NOT ALLOW COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND DESH DROHI BENAMI MEDIA TO INTERFERE IN ARMY MATTERS .   WE KNOW HOW THEY DID IN LT COL PUROHIT

PUT THIS COMMENT IN PMs, PMOs, DEFENCE MINISTERs, HOME MINISTERs , LAW MINISTERs WEBSITES

capt ajit vadakayil
..


WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION DO NOT TRUST THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ANYMORE.... WE WANT OUT....

THE SUPREME COURT HAS BECOME AN EVIL DEN LIKE JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS...

COLLEGIUM SYSTEM IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION... INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION ON THE PLANET WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES.

CJI JS KHEHAR WANTED TO CONTINUE TRIPLE TALAQ …... JS KHEHAR WANTED FOREIGN LAWYERS IN INDIA...WHAT IS HE WORTH ?...

COLLEGIUM MELORDS HAVE SCUTTLED NJAC . . ...IN THE RECENT PAST COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY SAVED SEVERAL TRAITORS WHO HAVE TRIED TO KILL BHARATMATA . .

BEFORE 1947 ALMOST ALL OUR JUDGES WERE IN THE PAYROLL OF JEW ROTHSCHILD . . .

WE KNOW COLLEGIUM JUDGES HAVE FOREIGN SUPPORT WHEN THEIR LEGISTLATE , DO EXTREME JUDICIAL OVERREACH . . . . . . .

MELORDS GIVE TOP PRIORITY FOR HOM0SEXUALITY , BOLLYWOOD AND CRICKET . . .

PM MODI CAN BE ABUSED LEFT AND RIGHT AND CALLED PSYCHOPATH --THE COLLEGIUM MELORD JUDGE SAID - - IT IS NORMAL - - - BECAUSE THERE WERE NO VIOLENT RIOTS -- . .

The GRAVE implication is, WE COLLEGIUM JUDGES CONTROL INDIA. . . Almost all media barons run their own foreign funded NGOs and they can trigger violent riots and then get the collegium judge to ACT AND JAIL ANYBODY . . …

OUR COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY BURNT MIDNIGHT OIL TO OPEN CHAMIYA BARS ( WH0RE HOUSES IN MUMBAI )…..

BREAD WINNERS OF ENTIRE FAMILIES HAVE BEEN ROTTING IN JAIL WITHOUT A TRIAL FOR THREE DECADES .. . . ..

CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO MAKE AND BREAK LAWS. . .. THIS IS THE SOLE PREROGATIVE OF THE LEGISLATURE....

WHEN WE MOVE AGAINST TRAITORS-- JEW NOAM CHOMSKY EXERTS HIS STRANGE INFLUENCE ON THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY. . ……

WE DO NOT WANT JUDICIARY TO PLAY GOD IN INDIA . .

THERE IS A NEXUS BETWEEN LAWYERS AND JUDGES. . .

TODAY OUR COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS PACKED WITH ANTI-HINDU AND ANTI-WATAN JUDGES. . .

WE DONT WANT LAWYERS TO BECOME JUDGES , AS THEY SOULS ARE ALREADY CORRUPTED . .

TODAY INDIA IS FULL OF TRAITORS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT AFRAID-- THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY SUPPORTS THEM...NOW WITH "PRIVACY" AS A ABSOLUTE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT FALSE RULING.....

WE DO NOT WANT COLLEGIUM JUDGES TO DECIDE ON CASES OF EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL SECURITY TO THE WATAN.............. …….

OUR FAILED LAWYERS TURNED COLLEGIUM JUDGES DO NOT HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO UNDERSTAND THAT SANE/ FAIR JUDGMENTS MUST BE WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF CONTEXT --AND NATURAL JUSTICE MUST BE INHERENT....

THE MELORDS CANT EVEN UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ... THIS IS WHY NAXALS LOOK INTO THE CAMERA AND SAY--WE TRUST OUR SUPREME COURT.

PM NARENDRA DAMODARDAS MODI AND LAW MINISTER -- DO YOU HAVE THE BAL.LS TO PROTECT BHARATMATA ? …..

Go0gle for the blogpost below----
…………………………………… RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA IS NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT SAYS CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL ………………………….

Capt ajit vadakayil
..


http://www.manushi.in/tinymce/uploaded/Purohit/Col.%20Purohit%5C%27s%20Letter%20to%20PM.pdf


  1. hi a,

    Neither the ATS nor the NIA have been able to establish a case against Lt Col Srikant Prasad Purohit, till now.

    Despite probing the matter for almost three years the NIA has not been able to gather any evidence against him to charge sheet him.

    So far there is NIL evidence against him in the 17 February 2007 Samjhauta Express blasts.

    The Indian Army handed Colonel Purohit over to the Maharashtra ATS when he was in Madhya Pradesh learning Arabic for an undercover SIMI operation.

    Aiding the colonel's defence is the testimony by 50 army personnel in the military court that he was, in reality, an infiltrator and NOT a conspirator.

    Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit has been in jail as an under-trial for over five years under the stringent MCOCA (Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act) -- which also put a black bag on "terrorist" cricketeer Shreeshant's head .

    Why is he being denied bail?

    At the time when Malegaon bomb blast case investigation was in progress, Purohit was undergoing a course in Arabic language in the AEC (Army Education Corps) Training College and Centre at Panchmarhi in Madhya Pradesh.

    He had specifically requested this 18 months long course in writing and the same was strongly recommended by the Commanding Officer of Southern Command Liaison Unit of Military Intelligence, based on his service profile, experience and performance. Before that he was posted in Devlali in district Nashik as an Intelligence Officer of the Southern Command Liaison Unit, Pune.

    Purohit was deputed to the Intelligence Wing of the Indian Army after he suffered a serious knee injury during anti-terrorist operations in Kashmir. His knee had to be reconstructed and the doctors advised him not to undertake any serious physical activity such as running or mountain climbing. That made him unfit for resuming his earlier job in the Infantry Division of the Army.

    Purohit had developed an effective intelligence network and was successful in putting together useful information about the infamous terror group, SIMI (Students Islamic Movement of India) and its links with Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the ISI (Inter Services Intelligence). Purohit’s service record shows that he had received several commendation certificates for good performance. The Confidential Reports (CR’s) by his seniors were also consistently positive. To quote a few:

    “The officer (Lt. Col. Purohit) has infiltrated the SIMI and other underground outfits in the region through his capabilities and go getter attitude” - Army’s Confidential Report (31 Dec 06)

    “He (Lt. Col. Purohit) developed an effective informant network in the AOR [Area of Responsibility] which led to acquisition of Naxal propaganda, Maoists and Terrorists.” - Army’s Confidential Report (15th February 2008)

    “My heartiest congratulations to you and all ranks of the battalion for successful operations in Gen Area Rangai on 07 May 02 which led to the killing of two foreign terrorists and recovery of large quantity of war like stores” - Brig. Prakash Menon, Commander, 68, Mountain Brigade (8 May 02)

    “I am extremely pleased to learn about the achievements of your Cell in obtaining actionable intelligence relating to the terrorist activities in you AOR.” - Lt. Col. Amitabh Joshi, Offg CO, 31, Composite Intelligence Unit (20 Mar 03)

    “I am extremely pleased to learn about the achievements of your Cell in obtaining intelligence relating to presence of hard core terrorists at Thimaran Forest MZ 2980 in your AOR” - Lt. Col. Amitabh Joshi, Offg CO, 31, Composite Intelligence Unit (04 Sep 03)

    WILL NARENDRA MODI PLAY VOTE BANK POLITICS OVER THIS OFFICER ?

    Capt Ajit Vadakayil
    ..

  2. you were right sir... colonel purohit is free now.
  3. WE WANT COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO PROTECT THE WATAN--NOT NAXALS, SEPARATISTS , CROOK OWNERS OF IPL OR CHAMIYA BAR WHORES

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..



WELL , IT IS FAR WORSE THAN THIS


WHISTLE BLOWERS HAVE SPOKEN ABUT THIS "JNU COMMIE PROFESSOR DEN"   TYPE MELORD COSY CLUB.


IN FUTURE--WHOEVER VANDALISES MUST PAY DAMAGES , OR REMAIN IN JAIL.

DERA CHIEF RAM RAHIM MUST PAY FOR ITEMS VANDALISED BY HIS FOLLOWERS AND ALL INDIRECT DAMAGES TOO 


vikas bharti
June 8, 2017 at 5:40 AM

Namastey captain
http://zeenews.india.com/hindi/india/impact-of-farmers-protest-in-madhya-pradesh/329236
In mp ,it seems that situation is going very bad.
Law and order is totally failed.

ReplyDelete
Replies

 #############
Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
June 8, 2017 at 6:20 AM

YESTERDAY I HEARD SCINDIA TELLING ON TV THAT FARMERS ARE "ANNADHATA "

SO FUCKIN' WHAT ?

THEY HAVE BECOME GODS ?

ANYBODY WHO VANDALISES MUST PAY A MUST HEAVY PRICE

THERE ARE NAXAL FARMERS !!

Capt Ajit Vadakayil
..

THE DERA VANDALS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HUNDREDS OF CRORES OF DAMAGES—DIRECT AND INDIRECT


THIS BLOGSITE APPRECIATES THE 20 YEAR JAIL SENTENCE FOR DERA CHIEF RAM RAHIM.

HOWEVER THIS BLOGSITE SUPPORTS ASARAM BAPU.   

THIS FELLOW ASARAM WAS NEVER POLITICALLY CORRECT AND WAS A HOTHEAD . ( Pssst-- my wife does not like him )





Many young women in India suffer from Paranoid Schizophrenia.  They can imagine they have  been raped . 

We warn the male Judiciary.   

Be VERY careful with your judgments . 



Let it NOT happen so that some woman lawyer charges " your honor "with rape after ten years.

HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW THAT TO GET A PASSPORT ( OR RENEW IT ) YOU ARE FINGER PRINTED ON BOTH HANDS ?


SO WHAT IS THIS HOOO HAAAA ABOUT AADHAR ?

‘Know Your Customer’ is a mandatory requirement for the government to nab criminals who operate SHELL COMPANIES for money laundering. Aadhar must be the basis for this where a citizen is identified by number and NOT name.

Even an idiot knows ( leave our stupid media ) that the linkage of Aadhaar to the government’s welfare programs involving either subsidy or other benefits will remain unaffected by  Supreme Court unanimous judgment upholding the right to privacy as a fundamental right.

Allocation of resources for human development is coupled with a legitimate concern that the utilisation of resources should not be siphoned off for extraneous purposes. Data mining with the object of ensuring that resources are properly deployed to legitimate beneficiaries is a valid ground for the state to insist on the collection of authentic data.

According to the government data, there are 276 cash-based transfer schemes that are currently covered under DBT ( direct benefit transfer ) and linked to Aadhaar.   Another 52 “in-kind schemes”, that involve government benefits in kind, are also linked to the identification number.

Routing government subsidies through Aadhaar has ensured a saving of Rs 57,000 crore in the last nearly three years.

Under Section 33 of the Aadhaar Act the government cannot release data, except under compelling public interest, which needs to be affirmed by the joint secretary in the home ministry and vetted by a committee of the cabinet secretary, IT secretary and law secretary.

The judgment just reads that personal liberty is not an absolute right but liable to the restrictions provided in the Constitution which will be examined on a case to case basis—within the PERIMETER OF CONTEXT and with NATURAL JUSTICE ( DHARMA ) and fairness paramount

There must be a level headed  and sensitive balance between individual interests and legitimate concerns of the WATAN.

The Centre told the Supreme Court that the deadline for linking Aadhaar to various government schemes for benefits will be extended till December 31 2017. 


We don’t want the elected executive to be slaves of the collegium Judiciary in financial matters. Even Rajya Sabha should NOT have a say in financial matters.

If the PAN was not linked to the Aadhar, then Article 139AA of the Income Tax Act invalidates the PAN. So it is mandatory to link Aadhar to PAN card.

The provision of the Income Tax Act is not a violation of Article 14 (Right to equality) and Article 19 of the Constitution.

There are criminals in India with several PAN cards.

How to Link Aadhar to PAN card:------
Log in to the official website of Income Tax www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in and click on the button “Link Aadhar”
Enter your Pan card number and Aadhar number. Enter the name written on Aadhar card.
Any important details are being asked here will be filled. If the details given in the Aadhar card and PAN card are different, you will first have to change the details (in any one of them) and make it same. If the details given in the Aadhar and PAN are the same, they will be easily linked.

BUT COMMIE CUNTS IN THE AADHAR CARD DEPT HAVE DELIBERATELY USED NAME INITIALS AND FUCKED UP THE SYSTEM.   

THIS WAS DONE TO HELP TERRORISTS .   

OUR SYSTEM IS ROTTEN FROM WITHIN.  

Keeping many PAN cards of people and shell companies caused the loss of tax of thousands of crores to the government.

In order to prevent the fraud from identifying the deceased, the government has made it mandatory to give the Aadhar number of the deceased to get the death certificate.

Aadhar must be linked to driving licence and for  registration of the vehicle.

The U. S. Constitution contains no express right to privacy.  The Bill of Rights, however, reflects the concern of James Madison and other framers for protecting specific aspects of privacy, such as the privacy of beliefs (1st Amendment), privacy of the home against demands that it be used to house soldiers (3rd Amendment), privacy of the person and possessions as against unreasonable searches (4th Amendment), and the 5th Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination, which provides protection for the privacy of personal information.  In addition, the Ninth Amendment states that the "enumeration of certain rights" in the Bill of Rights "shall not be construed to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people."

IN INDIA WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW TERRORISTS , NAXALS AND SEPARATISTS TO HIDE BEHIND PRIVACY LAWS, EVEN IF NHRC, COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA WANTS IT.  

The loser lawyers turned Judges—the bottom of the cerebral barrel at school, do NOT understand that privacy as a concept cannot be defined, and should therefore not be recognised as a specific right under the Constitution. 

We the people will allow this only on A CASE TO CASE BASIS , within the PERIMETER OF CONTEXT in consonance to NATURAL JUSTICE .

THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION DOES NOT PROTECT ANY DESH DROHI –ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO POINT A FOREIGN GUN AT BHARATMATA

We will not allow , the right to privacy to hide the naked truth.  Good people who have nothing tohide do not need a veil of privacy

The apex Court has recognised sexual orientation as an essential attribute of privacy and dignity. Well Melords—we don’t have a problem with homosexual creatures as long as they are NOT pedophiles.  The reality is 99.5% of homosexuals are pedophiles

The challenge to the Aadhaar Act is still pending, and will now be heard by the Supreme Court in the context of last week's judgment, among other things. The collegium judiciary has NO right to rule on aadhar. We the people want the elected executive to call the shots—of course we want the data NOT to be compromised to criminals.

WE KNOW WHY ROTHSCHILDs FOREIGN KOSHER MEDIA IS CELEBRATING .  WE ARE NOT IDIOTS


“Our society prospers in the shadow of its drapes,” the SUPERME court wrote, “which let in sunshine and reflect a multitude of hues based on language, religion, culture and ideologies.”

OH BOY, I AM TOUCHED  —SUCH ERUDITE JUDGES ?  

WELL THEY MUST BE THE CREAM OF THE  SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL , EVEN ABOVE THE IIT STUDENTS—THESE CANT BE THE BOTTOM DREGS RIGHT ?

WRONG !

THANK GOD THEY DID NOT INVOKE SIGMUND FREUD INTO THEIR “ELOQUENT” 547 PAGE BHAARDEEKT --NAY VERDICT


Privacy,  is not suitable for a developing country like India where the majority of the masses don't even have access to basic services and lakhs don’t have homes –where corruption is rife .  

Judgements and laws established in other developed Western nations have no applicability in India, where the reality is very different.

THE “GREEN REVOLUTION” WAS ADOPTED BY DESH DROHIS IN INDIA.  THE SOIL IS ISRAEL OR HOLLAND OR USA IS NOT THE SAME AS HOLY INDIAN TOPSOIL

YET WE APED THE WEST AND BROUGHT IN ARTIFICIAL FERTILISERS AND CHEMICAL PESTICIDES WHICH DECIMATED OUR PRICELESS TOP SOIL AND ITS PRECIOUS MICROBES --WHICH GAVE US FOOD OF THE “GOLDEN MEAN”.  

OUR FOOD WAS PREVENTIVE MEDICINE-- NOT ANYMORE !

TODAY AFTER MILLIONS OF YEARS –IN JUST 55 YEARS –OUR SOIL HAS BECOME DIRT AND OUR WATER HAS BECOME GREEN FROTHY SLIME .   

90% OF OUR LAKES WHICH WERE PRISTINE BLUE FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS HAS EITHER DISAPPEARED OR HAS BECOME UNDRINKABLE SLIME


We the people will NOT allow the Aadhaar Act, designed to root out corruption, for enabling better delivery of public welfare and social services to the masses, to be scuttled on faalthu privacy claims. 

This is what the jealous west wants. 

They know that in another 16 years Idia will be this planet’s No 1 superpower. They have their agents in India who are on their payroll, to scuttle Aadhar.

If Bill Clinton had his privacy claims—the planet would have never knows what was the WHITE SPOT on Monica Lewisnsky’s blue dress.  

Monica baby was giving Bill baby blow jobs from under the presidential desh .   May be ABHISEX SINGHVI baby can elaborate about blowjobs from under the desk. 

Bill baby was shoving HUGE cuban cigars into Monica baby’s  twat , lighting it and blowing smoke rings while sitting on the most powerful chair on this planet.  Privacy my ass .


JUDGES CAN ONLY JUDGE FOR A SPECIFIC CASE.

WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW JUDGES TO CREATE PATHETIC RULINGS WHICH WILL BE USED AS A LIFE LONG GOSPEL—  WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT

EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT THE KHARAK SINGH CASE .    

90% OF THE JDUGES DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT IT IS.    I CAN PROVIDE A QUIZ SESSION OF 30 QUESTIONS ON LIVE TV, AND ALL WILL FALL PHUTT ON THEIR MELORD FACES

The Constituent Assembly while framing the Constitution had denied privacy as a fundamental right.

To this, the Melord bench observed that much had changed since the times the Constituent Assembly debated and rejected the right to privacy.   

WELL WELL WELL-- HULLLOOOOOO MELORDS, THESE DAYS WE HAVE NO TERRORISTS , NAXALS AND SEPARATISTS


THE MAIN PEOPLE PUSHING THIS PRIVACY ACT ARE THE “LAND GRABBERS” .

WE ASK MODI TO PROFILE EVERY SQUARE METER OF LAND IN INDIA USING GOOGLE MAPS.   SEND ALL THESE LAND GRABBING BASTRADS TO JAIL—LONG TERM

TELGI STAMP PAPER SCAM WAS NOT ABOUT SELLING FAKE STAMP PAPER . ONLY MINDLESS CUNTS WILL TALK THIS WAY.  THE MONEY GOT BY SELLING FAKE STAMP PAPER IS JUST  0.001% 

FAKE TELGI STAMP PAPER WAS USED TO REGULARISE GRABBED LAND UNDER BENAMI NAMES.  99.99% OF THE MOOLAH MADE WAS FROM LAND GRABBING AND REGULARISING IT


WHY DOES IT TAKE A BLOGGER TO REVEAL THIS ,  DECADES AFTER IT HAPPENED ?

ARE THERE NO INTELLIGENT PEOPLE IN INDIA?

IS THIS WHY MAIN STREAM MEDIA EMPLOYS ONLY MINDLESS CUNTS –  HAVING GIFT OF GAB,  BUT FIT ONLY FOR CRICKET , BOLLYWOOD AND HINDI HEARTLAND POLITICS ?

HEY COMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI , WOULD YOU LIKE TO GET INTO A TECHNICAL DEBATE WITH CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL ON LIVE TV—ON A SUBJECT OF “YOUR CHOICE”.    

DON’T EVEN DARE ARNAB BABY  , I WILL STRIP YOU NAKED AND  RAPE YOU CEREBRALLY !    

JUMPING UP AND DOWN LIKE A DEMENTED ORANGUTAN DURING DEBATES WILL NOT MAKE YOU A GREAT JOURNALIST

Read all 8 parts of the post below--
JUST WHO ARE THESE COLLEGIUM JUDGES ?

THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS DHARMA OR NATURAL JUSTICE.    

THE MELORDS HANG ON TO JEW ROTHSCHILDs KOSHER LANGOT  STENCILLED WITH "JUSTICE IS BLIND "

YES, THE BLOODY BROKEN NOSE MADE CONTACT WITH THE SPIKED FIST --AND DIRTIED THE FIST .  

THE SOFT CRUSHED NOSE MUST BE PUNISHED FOR TRAUMATIZING THE SHARP SPIKED FIST , RIGHT COLLEGIUM MELORDS ?

WRONG !   

NOT ANY MORE !!

THIS BLOGSITE EXISTS TO TAKE CARE OF THIS !!!

THESE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WHO FOUND NOTHING WRONG WHEN 5.1 LAKHS KASHMIRI PANDITS WERE ETHNICALLY CLEANSED AND SUBJECTED TO GENOCIDE.

THOUSANDS OF HINDU TEMPLES WERE RAZED DOWN IN KASHMIR.   THESE MELORDS JUMPED WHEN A BABRI MAJID ( MECCA OF HINDUS ) WAS RAZED DOWN


HULLO PM MODI—  YOUR TENURE IS NEARLY OVER.  THIS BLOGSITE CHARGES YOU FOR IGNORING THE PLIGHT OF KASHMIRI PANDITS.  THIS BLOGSITE WILL WRITE YOU LEGACY APCO MODI.

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS ONE SOUL WHO DOES NOT JUMP INTO THE BANDWAGON.. HE HAS THE PERCEPTION TO CALL—

A CUNT   A CUNT—
OR
 A LIAR   A LIAR

I am the only person to ever support Pol Pot—everybody knows this

But even a 8 year old child who reads the post below, will cry—  

CAPTAIN IS 100% RIGHT— 

ONLY CAPTAIN CAN THINK CLEARLY AND FEARLESSLY ON THIS PLANET.

THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IS GRANTED BY “NATURAL JUSTICE”  ( DHARMA ) AND NOT BY THE CONSTITUTION

The Indian constitution lays down the framework defining fundamental political principles, establishes the structure, procedures, powers and duties of government institutions and sets out fundamental rights, directive principles and the duties of citizens.

The constitution was adopted by the ”Constituent Assembly” on 26 November 1949, and came into effect on 26 January 1950
India celebrates its coming into force on 26 January each year, as Republic Day.

When the Constitution of India came into force on 26 January 1950, it repealed the Indian Independence Act. 

India ceased to be a dominion of the British Crown and became a sovereign democratic republic.

An idea for a Constituent Assembly of India was proposed in 1934 by Jew Rothschild’s agent M. N. Roy, the founder of the Indian  Communist movement in India .  MN Roy had a JEWESS honey trap wife named Evelyn Trent

The Constituent Assembly was established while India was under British rule.. The Constituent Assembly had 299 representatives, including nine women.

Institutions of governance – the Parliament, the President, the Judiciary, the Executive, etc. get their power from the Constitution and are bound by it.

With the aid of the Constitution, India is governed by a parliamentary system of government with the executive directly accountable to the legislature.

The process of addition, variation or repeal of any part of the constitution by the parliament under its constituent powers, is called amendment of the constitution.

The procedure is laid out in Article 368. An amendment bill must be passed by each House of the Parliament by a majority of the total membership of that House when at least two-thirds members are present and voted. In addition to this, certain amendments which pertain to the federal nature of the Constitution must be ratified by a majority of state legislatures. 

Unlike the ordinary bills under legislative powers of Parliament as per Article 245 (with exception to money bills), there is no provision for joint sitting of the two houses (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) of the parliament to pass a constitutional amendment bill


The Supreme Court has ruled in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case that, while amending anything in the Constitution, it cannot tinker with the "basic structure" or its framework, which is immutable.

BALLS !

WE DON’T WANT COLLEGIUM  JUDICIARY ( WHICH HAS ZERO TRANSPARENCY ) TO HAVE SUCH SWEEPING POWERS .

In the Indian constitution, Judicial review is dealt with under Article 13. Judicial Review refers that the Constitution is the supreme power of the nation and all laws are under its supremacy.

THE CONSTITUTION IS A DYNAMIC DOCUMENT.   

IT IS NOT ETCHED ON ROCK .

The Constitution's provisions have consciously been worded in generalities, though not in vague terms, instead of making them rigid and static with a fixed meaning or content as in an ordinary statute, so that they may be interpreted by coming generations of citizens with the ONWARD MARCH OF TIME, to apply to NEW AND EVER CHANGING AND DEMANDING SITUATIONS, making the Constitution a living and an organic document.


Rigidity tends to check progressive legislation or gradual innovation.

ONLY A FLEXIBLE DYNAMIC CONSTITUTION CAN SURVIVE THE TEST OF TIME.    

IN 1947 WHO WOULD EVEN IMAGINE OF DIGITIZATION OF INDIAN ECONOMY AND OF SOMETHING CALLED GST .


It is a document intended “to endure for ages” and therefore, it has to be interpreted not merely on the basis of the intention and understanding of the its framers but on the experience of its working effectively, in the existing social and political context.

Jawaharlal Nehru spAke in the Constituent Assembly on 8 November 1948, "While we want this Constitution to be as solid and as permanent a structure as we can make it, nevertheless there is no permanence in Constitutions. There should be a certain flexibility. If you make anything rigid and permanent, you stop a nation’s growth, the growth of a living, vital, organic people. Therefore, it has to be flexible ... while we, who are assembled in this House, undoubtedly represent the people of India, nevertheless I think it can be said, and truthfully, that when a new House, by whatever name it goes, is elected in terms of this Constitution, and every adult in India has the right to vote - man and woman - the House that emerges then will certainly be fully representative of every section of the Indian people. It is right that House elected so - under this Constitution of course it will have the right to do anything - should have an easy opportunity to make such changes as it wants to. But in any event, we should not make a Constitution, such as some other great countries have, which are so rigid that they do not and cannot be adapted easily to changing conditions. Today especially, when the world is in turmoil and we are passing through a very swift period of transition, what we may do today may not be wholly applicable tomorrow. Therefore, while we make a Constitution which is sound and as basic as we can, it should also be flexible ..."

RIGHT TO LIFE  as guaranteed under Article 21, has by interpretation been expanded to progressively mean a whole lot of human rights

A constitution is not a parchment of paper, it is a way of life and has to be lived up to. 

Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty and in the final analysis, its only keepers are WE THE PEOPLE.

THE CONSTITUTION BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF IT ACTS AGAINST THE WATAN

THE CONSTITUTION BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF IT GOES AGAINST THE PRINCIPLE OF DHARMA ( NATURAL JUSTICE )

THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL—THESE “LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES” DON’T SEEM TO UNDERSTAND THIS

The procedure of amendment in the constitution is laid down in Part XX (Article 368) of the Constitution of India. 

This procedure ensures the sanctity of the Constitution of India and keeps a check on arbitrary power of the Parliament of India and also EXTREME JUDICIAL OVERREACH  by Collegium Judiciary which is NOT sanctioned by the Constitution

The ILLEGAL SOLLEGIUM SYSTEM which is the current method for appointing judges to High Courts and Supreme Court, came into existence in 1993 with a judgment of the Supreme Court in Second Judges case.

WE THE PEOPLE ARE ANGRY –NAY- PISSED OFF with the  Collegium Judiciary for instances of nepotism, favouritism and elevation of incompetent judges

The Modi Govt had introduced the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) by way of a Constitutional amendment to overcome the Second Judges case and thereby, do away with the Collegium system.

The Supreme Court had, in another instance EXTREME JUDICIAL OVER REACH  however, struck down the said amendment as unconstitutional.

Justice Chelameswar was highly critical of the manner in which the Collegium functioned. He wrote--  “Have we really outgrown the malady of dependence or merely transferred it from the political to judicial hierarchy?”

Subsequently, Chelameswar J. had refrained from attending Collegium meetings last year.

The framers of our Constitution and WE THE PEOPLE did not intend the judiciary to be “superior” to elected Parliament and the elected executive, but intended it to be the sentinel on the qui vive should the other two wings overstep the boundaries of their jurisdiction or omit to discharge their duty as public trustees.

THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONSTITUTION NOR THEY HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO APLY BODMAS

Under Article 145(1), the Supreme Court can make rules for regulating the practice and procedure of the court, which is essentially a legislative function. 

However, such power can be exercised ONLY REPEAT ONLY  with the EXPRESS APPROVAL OF THE PRESIDENT  and is SUBJECT  to the provisions of any law made by PARLIAMENT.

Collegium Judiciary CANNOT exercise adjudicatory power, without any CHECKS AND BALANCES . 

This  would be destructive of the basic feature of democracy, and if not forthwith remedied, would dilute the very essence of a democratic form of governance.

The ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY has never ever been  accountable in the manner that the elected executive is accountable. 

These Melords keep pointing fingers without any sense of accountability.   If these Judges were Captains of ships they would be thrown overboard by the crew within 24 hours

It is a constitutional imperative that an authority must be accountable if it wields power.

Since the appointment of judges is an executive function and not an adjudicatory function, accountability follows as its inseparable concomitant.    

Presently, in matters of judicial appointment, the accountability seems to lie neither with the judiciary nor with the executive. Such a situation is without precedent, in our country or elsewhere.

WHY DO WE NEED A PRESIDENT ?

WE THE PEOPLE have the ULTIMATE STAKE  in the general administration of justice and the government is the elected trustee of public interest.  Therefore, it must  be allowed to have a say in the appointment of judges

The ELECTED EXECUTIVE now been reduced to a “rubber stamp” in the matter of appointment of judges.

AS PER THE LAW THESE DELIBERATELY ERRING  JUDGES CAN GO TO JAIL AND BE DENIED OF THEIR RETIREMENT BENEFITS


HULLO PM MODI—   DO YOU HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO UNDERSTAND THIS SIMPLE TRUTH ?  

DO YOU AND THE PRESIDENT KHO KHO KOVINDA KNOW YOUR OWN POWERS ?




The “primacy” of the judiciary was neither intended nor provided for by the Constituent Assembly.

The primacy of the chief justice of India or a collegium of judges cannot be part of the basic structure of the Constitution. A collegium of five judges curtails the discretion of the president, enshrined in Article 124(2), to consult such judges of the Supreme Court and high courts as he may “deem necessary for the purpose”.

 If the president deems it necessary to consult more than five LORD FUCKLANDS-- nay —COLLEGIUM JUDGES of the Supreme Court, judges of the high court and other judges of the Supreme Court (not part of the collegium), who unanimously or by a majority give an opinion contrary to that of the collegium, the president would nevertheless be bound by the opinion of the ILLEGAL MAFIA collegium.

This is ridiculous nay- NULL AND VOID  as it breaches of the letter and spirit of the Constitution.

The parameter for judicial review of a constitution amendment is very narrow, because democracy is based on the principle of majority. In exercising the power of judicial review, the courts cannot be oblivious of the practical needs of the government… 

Judicial review is not intended to create what is sometimes called judicial oligarchy, the aristocracy of the robe, covert legislation, or judge-made law. The proper forum to fight for the wise use of the legislative authority is that of public opinion and legislative assemblies. Such contest cannot be transferred to the judicial arena

HULLO PM MODI –DO YOU HAVE BALLS ?

WE THE PEOPLE ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION. 

THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE WHICH YOU HEAD PM MODI IS JUST A TRUSTEE OF “WE THE PEOPLE”—WE DEMAND AN EXPLANATION

The constitutional amendment in relation to appointment of judges was passed with an overwhelming majority in both the houses of Parliament, with only one dissent –of a HALF WIT

WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND THAT THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY BE DISBANDED IMMEDIATELY

 Article 145(3) states that a MINIMUM OF FIVE judges are to sit for the purpose of deciding any case involving a substantial question of law pertaining to interpretation of the Constitution or a presidential reference under Article 143.

The use of the word “minimum” implies that the composition of the bench has to be decided according to the needs of the time and the importance of the constitutional question. A minimum of five judges was prescribed when the total strength of judges was seven, which later has increased to THIRTY ONE now.

Although Parliament must preserve the basic framework of the Constitution, there is no other limitation placed upon the amending power, meaning that there is absolutely no  provision of the Constitution that cannot be amended.

The Supreme Court first struck down a constitutional amendment in 1967, on the basis that it violated Article 13: "The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by [the charter of Fundamental Rights]". The term "law" in this article was interpreted as including a constitutional amendment.

Parliament showed BALLS and responded by enacting the twenty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India which declared that "nothing in Article 13 shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution".

The current limitation on amendments comes from Kesavananda Bharati v. The State of Kerala, where the Supreme Court ruled that amendments of the constitution must respect the "basic structure" of the constitution, and certain fundamental features of the constitution cannot be altered by amendment. 

Parliament RIGHTLY removed this limitation by enacting the Forty-second Amendment, which declared, among other provisions, that "there shall be no limitation whatever on the constituent power of Parliament to amend ...this Constitution".   

However, this change was itself later ILLEGALLY declared invalid by the Supreme Court in Minerva Mills v. Union of India.


Judicial corruption has been around ever since the system of courts evolved in the Common Law of the United Kingdom, and passed on to India by JEW Rothschild as a colonial legacy.

There are NO checks and balances in selection of Judges –and we know that this process is controlled from abroad as is the case with JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS.
Any form of authoritarianism is a danger to the fundamental rights of citizens.  

The Collegium judiciary has developed the mindset that it is above the law.   We the people would not have minded if these judges were the CREAM of the school cerebral barrel-- and not the bottom dregs



Britain whose constitution was lifted by Jew Rothschild and given to BR Ambedkar and team is a flexible constitution.  

A FLEXIBLE constitution is one in which the legislature may amended the constitution's content and principles through use of the ordinary legislative process.

THERE ARE COMMIE IDIOTS WHO STILL KEEP THE OLD CATHODE RAY TUBE TV IN THEIR LIVING ROOMS.  THE WORLD HAS MOVED ON, THESE PATHETIC COMMIE WORMS CANNOT

The United Kingdom does not have one specific constitutional document named as such. Instead, the so called constitution of the United Kingdom is a sum of laws and principles that make up the body politic of the UK. This is sometimes referred to as an "unwritten" or uncodified constitution.

The British constitution primarily draws from four sources: statute law (laws passed by the legislature), common law (laws established through court judgments), parliamentary conventions, and works of authority. Similar to a written constitution, this sum also concerns both the relationship between the individual and the state, and the functioning of the legislature, the executive and judiciary.

In Britain , the Parliament is the supreme law-making body: its Acts are the highest source of English law.  According to the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, the UK Parliament may pass any legislation that it wishes.

Israel as of 2017 functions according to a FLEXIBLE uncodified constitution consisting of both material constitutional law, based upon cases and precedents, common law, and the provisions of these formal statutes

By contrast, in India we have a codified constitution, the legislature is normally forbidden from passing laws that contradict that constitution: constitutional amendments require a special procedure that is more arduous than that for regular laws.  By allowing this we CRUSH innovation.

A flexible constitution can be amended by ordinary law making exercise while a rigid constitution can be amended by a very difficult and special procedure.

The Constitution can be amended in three ways such as:---
The Parliament can alter or modify many of the laws of the Constitution by a simple majority as is required for ordinary legislations. For instance the Parliament can deal with the abolition or creation of Legislative Councils (Article 169). Further, the Parliament can change the name of boundaries, areas etc. of States through simple majority; and these changes don’t even need to done via a Constitutional Amendment Bill. These are examples of most flexible provisions of the constitution.

Parliament can amend other major parts of the Constitution with special majority (a majority of not less than 2/3 of the members of each House present and majority of them voting) as mentioned in Article 368. This process can be semi-rigid and examples include those amendments needed for inclusion / exclusion of fundamental special right, special provisions for SC/ST, special provisions for some regions etc.

The amendments to certain features affecting the federal structure of Indian State requires special majority with ratification by half of the States. Provisions related to election to the President and its manner; extent of the executive power of the Union and the states; Supreme Court and high courts etc. fall under this. These are examples of a rigid constitution

Despite its rigidity , the Indian constitution has been amended  101 times since its enactment. Had it been rigid, it was not possible to amend it almost twice a year. Amendment No 101 doe on 1st July 2017 is about GST.

There are two types of amendments to the constitution which are governed by article 368:--
The first type includes amendments that can be effected by Parliament of India by a prescribed ‘special majority’; and

The second type of amendments includes those that require, in addition to such "special majority", ratification by at least one half of the State Legislatures.

Amending the Constitution of India is the process of making changes to the nation's fundamental law or supreme law. The procedure of amendment in the constitution is laid down in Part XX (Article 368) of the Constitution of India

The basic structure doctrine is an Indian judicial principle that the Constitution of India has certain basic features that cannot be altered or destroyed through amendments by the parliament.   Key among these "basic features", are the fundamental rights granted to individuals by the constitution.

THE ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IS NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT—AS IT WILL HELP DESH DROHIS AND FOREIGN FUNDED TRAITORS WHO POINT A GUN AT BHARATMATA.    

THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL—OUR “LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES” DO NOT HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO UNDERSTAND THIS

WE KNOW THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND THE BENAMI MEDIA .

These Melords of the Collegium Judiciary do NOT even understand what is the meaning of  altering this "basic structure" of the Constitution.

NO NATION CAN PROGRESS WITHOUT INNOVATION

We must nurture a climate where innovation happens.  With such low quality brains in the Judiciary it is NOT possible—the Collegium Judicial system  kills creativity.    They want us to hang film roll cameras around our necks in this digital camera age.  If these pathetic Judges send a rocket to Mars it will never reach the destination.

This is why we need a selection process by way of an all India exam like IIT JEE to select judges.

Innovation must be  evolutionary and not a revolutionary panic response to change. I am this planet’s No 1 CHANGE MANAGER – I know !

To innovate is not to reform, but to bring useful change. Changes need not be innovations but innovations are changes. Application of creativity is innovation.

Judges work behind a veil of secrecy .  While the elected Parliament  brainstorm to get feedback.

We can sense the drift of change and ensure that we are aligned to it in advance as surely as a ship enters a narrow channel. We take change by hand before it takes us by the throat.

At sea I never allowed my creative wild geese to fly in military formation. This is why Capt Ajit Vadakayil is a LIVING LEGEND at sea.    Innovate or die was my slogan.    People know that at sea I flouted all laid down procedures ( by stupid white men ) , but my shore bosses dared not punish me as my own procedures were perfect .   

Our organisational gatekeepers frame the environment that enables innovation, however innovation is enacted – recognised, developed, applied and adopted – through individual employees..   Collective synergy of experience and expertise, accented with harmony, loyalty and camaraderie was indisputably our core asset. How may of you think that our Melord Judges can understand this small simple para ?

We must have a commitment not to allow our MINDLESS OUTDATED policies , RIGID  procedures and MEANINGLESS MELORD rituals to get in the way of innovation.

I have worked for a lot of ignorant companies, who confuse goals with values. Their collective noses are stuck forever in a knothole. They get their knickers in a twist when they are reminded that --  "A goal is something you intend to accomplish. A value is something you believe in"

The basic features of the Constitution have not been explicitly defined by the Judiciary, and the claim of any particular feature of the Constitution to be a "basic" feature MUST be determined by the Court in each case that comes before it.

But hey—
WHEN HAVE OUR “JUSTICE IS BLIND” MELORDS EVER UNDERSTOOD PERIMETER OF CONTEXT  OR THE MEANING OF BODMAS ?

AT SCHOOL IN MATH CLASSES IF A STUDENT DID NOT UNDERSTAND BODMAS – HE IS CALLED A CUNT .

THESE RIGID MINDED MELORDS IF MADE CAPTAIN OF A SHIP WILL RUSH INTO AN ONCOMING TYPHOON.

Any part of the Constitution is amendable and that the Parliament might, by passing a Constitution Amendment Act in compliance with the requirements of article 368, amend any provision of the Constitution, including the Fundamental Rights and article 368.

Some of the features of the Constitution termed as "basic" are listed below:---

Supremacy of the Constitution
Rule of law
The principle of Separation of Powers
The objectives specified in the Preamble to the Constitution
Judicial Review
Articles 32 and 226
Federalism (including financial liberty of states under Articles 282 and 293)
Secularism
The Sovereign, Democratic, Republican structure
Freedom and dignity of the individual
Unity and integrity of the Nation
The principle of equality, not every feature of equality, but the quintessence of equal justice;
The "essence" of other Fundamental Rights in Part III
The concept of social and economic justice — to build a Welfare State: Part IV in toto
The balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
The Parliamentary system of government
The principle of free and fair elections
Limitations upon the amending power conferred by Article 368
Independence of the Judiciary
Effective access to justice
Powers of the Supreme Court under Articles 32, 136, 141, 142
Legislation seeking to nullify the awards made in exercise of the judicial power of the State by Arbitration Tribunals constituted under an Act
Welfare state
Every part of the  Constitution is amendable and that the Parliament might, by passing a Constitution Amendment Act in compliance with the requirements of article 368, amend any provision of the Constitution, including the Fundamental Rights and article 368.

The basic structure of our constitution consists of the following:--

The preponderance of DHARMA ( natural justice )

Maintenance of the unity and integrity of India.

The sovereignty of the country.

 ( ENSURE THAT WE TAKE  A RUBBER STAMP WHEN WE SIGN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS LIKE WTO—  “PARAMOUNT CLAUSE” – “NOTHING AGREED IN THIS DOCUMENT CAN INFRINGE THE SOVREIGNITY OF INDIA AMONG THE COMITY OF NATIONS”

The supremacy of the constitution ( WHICH IS SUBJECT TO INNOVATION ).

A republican and democratic form of government.

The secular character of the Constitution.

Maintenance of the separation of powers.  ( WE WILL NOT ALLOW THE JUDICIARY TO  "RAP"  THE KNUCKLES OF THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE GHADI GHADI .   THE BENAMI MEDIA LOVES TO TELL THIS , RIGHT ?  THESE MEDIA PICKLE JOHNS AND CHUTNEY MARYs  GET A HUGE KICK OUT OF RUNNING SUCH FOOTERS ON BENAMI TV )

The federal character of the Constitution.

Essential features of individual freedoms. ( CONSTITUTION DOES NOT PROTECT FOREIGN FUNDED AND ARMED TRAITORS )

Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship.

Equality of status and opportunity. ( BUT, FOREIGNERS / ALIENS WILL NOT GET SAME STATUS AS GOOD CITIZENS )

WE SEE STATUES OF A MAN WEARING AN ANGREZ THREE PIECE SUIT CLUTCHING A THICK BOOK --  ALL OVER INDIA.     



YOU CAN ABUSE GOD VISHNU ( DHONI/ AROON PURIE )-- AND PISS ON HIS IDOL ( UR ANANTHAMURTHY ) BUT YOU CANT SAY A WORD AGAINST THIS MAN.

During a seminar, in June 2014, Kalburgi had denounced idol worship as a “meaningless ritual”.  He declared  “One can even urinate on idols”, while quoting from a Kannada scholar Professor U.R. Ananthamurthy’s work.

Below: UR Ananthamurthy despite ridiculing Hindu rituals got himself cremated.   

BR Ambedkar despite ridiculing Brahmins got married to a Chitpavan " Brahmin " woman.

Just who the hell  told that writing the constitution was a one man show? 

It was a team who did that.   BR Ambedkar was of course involved in making it a "social responsibility and relations " document.

It was a sheer copy of the British model, just amended to suit India-- a draft given to Ambedkar on the quiet by Rothschild.. There was NIL brainwork involved. 

Why don't you compare the two constitutions. Where is the intelligence, in copying and plagiarism?

Dr B. R. Ambedkar was just the Chairman of an eminent team consisting of K M Munshi, Alladi Krishnaswamy Iyer,  N Gopalaswami Ayengar ,  Madhava Rao ,  Md. Saadullah ,  TT Krishnamachari and a  constitutional advisor Sir Benegal Narsing Rau .

Sir Benegal Narsing Rau was chosen by Rothschild to play a liaison role in drafting the Constitution of India. 

From 1949 to 1952 Sir Benegal Narsing Rau was India's Permanent Representative to the UN, till he was appointed as a Judge of the International Court in The Hague. He also served as the President of the United Nations Security Council.

His brother SIR Benegal Rama Rau were Governor of the Reserve Bank of India
JEW Rothschild favoured the CHITRAPUR MUTT darlings of a particular DNA.  

Chitrapur Mutt is a FAKE and backdated Mutt created by JEW Rothschild.

Girish Karnad,  Shyam Benegal,  Deepike Padukone ( whom COMMIE FTII students love )  are a few of them.

The other brother Benegal Shiva Rao  was married to a German Jew d Kitty Verstaendig.   Rothschild made him the chief of INTUC  . 

After all JEW Lenin had said -  IF YOU WANT TO CONTROL THE OPPOSOTION LEAD THEM YOURSELF.



Below: Chitrapur Mutt men Girish Karnad  and  Shyam Benegal,  UR Ananthamurthy ( who pissed on a Hindu temple idol ) ,   Saeed Akhtar Mirza ( anti-Hindu award wapsi pioneer with a Christian wife Jennifer  ) of ANHAD NGO   whose trustees are Shabnam Hashmi, K N Panikkar, Harsh Mander, Shubha Mudgal, Kamla Bhasin, Saeed Akhtar Mirza.


The separation of powers among the major branches of government, the establishment of a supreme court was copied from the US model,  provided by Rothschild.


BURN ALL PAST JUDGEMENTS OF THE MELORDS WHO OPERATE ON THE PREMISE THAT “JUSTICE IS BLIND “ AND THE FACT THAT “DHARMA / WATAN / WE THE PEOPLE”  ARE BELOW THE CONSTITUTION.

Basic structure theory ( absolutely rigid): as per this theory evolved in Kesavananda Bharti VS Kerala Govt  case by supreme Court “the Parliament cannot use its power to amend the Constitution to alter, distort or damage in anyway the basic characteristics and principles of Constitution “

On April 24, 1973, Chief Justice Sikri and 12 judges of the Supreme Court took up the case of Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala.  They heard the case  for 68 days, the arguments commencing on October 31, 1972, and ending on March 23, 1973.    Literally hundreds of cases were cited and the then Attorney-General had made a comparative chart analysing the provisions of the Constitutions of 71 different countries!  -- ALMOST ALL OUT OF FUCKIN’ CONTEXT

The 703-page judgment revealed a sharply divided court and, by a wafer-thin majority of 7:6, it was held that Parliament could amend any part of the Constitution so long as it did not alter or amend “the basic structure or essential features of the Constitution.” This was the inherent and implied limitation on the amending power of Parliament

Shri Kesavananda Bharati or officially, Srimad Jagadguru Sri Sri Sankaracharya Thotakacharya Keshavananda Bharathi Sripadangalavaru  was the pontiff  of Jagadguru Sri Sankaracharya Thotakacharya Samsthanam,  Edneer Mutt ( CREATED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD )  in Kasaragod district of the Indian state of Kerala

This case was concerning the right to manage Hindu religion owned property without government interference.  

 This case was just a front to allow massive Christian / Commie grabbed temple lands from being reclaimed.

Hindu temple lands had been grabbed by Jew Rothschild , the Christian missionaries and the commie govts of Kerala.

EXAMPLES ?:
AAA )  In 1971 , 27,000 acres of Kottiyoor Temple land was captured under Indian Forest laws in an arbitrary manner.   After a sustained legal tussle  in 1980,  107 acres of land full of medicinal herbs and special trees surrounding the temple was given back to Kottiyoor temple authorities. 

BBB )  100 years ago, Kerala had 30500 Snake temples used as Ayurveda herbal banks . Today less than 4800 are left.

Indira Gandhi nationalised 14 major Rothschild front banks and the compensation was made payable in bonds that matured after 10 years!  This was struck down by the Supreme Court, although it upheld the right of Parliament to nationalise banks.  

The story of Indian Judiciary has always been the same .  They did NOT recognize the rights of Bharatmata  ( WATAN )

ONLY CUNTS DEPEND ON A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION TO DELIVER FREEDOM


The rights to life and liberty are pre-existing natural rights—and we don’t need the constitution to guarantee it.

The right to privacy is not in the Constitution and is not a part of the right to life—only an idiot will content so

 An eight-judge bench in 1954 and a six-judge bench in 1962 had both ruled that there is no right to privacy.

The right to life to include the right to clean air/ water and sleep. Yet we are woken up at 5AM by ear drum shattering AZAN calls.  

The Melords don’t have the BALLS to deal with disruption of REM sleep at 5 AM

Iris scans and fingerprints for Aadhar does NOT violate citizens' privacy.   Only an idiot and a desh drohi will content otherwise

There needs to be a "careful and sensitive balance between individual interests and legitimate concerns of the state" such as "preventing and investigating crime, encouraging innovation and the spread of knowledge, and preventing the dissipation of social welfare benefits






Right to privacy is an amorphous right and not absolute. It is only a small sub-sect of liberty

HEY BOTTOM OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES -- ME LORDS -- CAN YOU APPLY BODMAS BETWEEN PRIVACY AND LIBERTY ?


 LIBERTY ALLOWS US TO EXPOSE BASTARDS HIDING BEHIND THE VEIL OF PRIVACY



Times have changed .. We live in an age of big data and the State is entitled to regulate the data whether it is for the purpose of regulating crime, taxation or other activities...  Right to privacy cannot be so absolute that it prevents the State from legislating or regulating it. The state needs to defends its citizens from traitors holding foreign guns.

Why are the homosexuals bitching?   Has the state ever asked them to declare their sexual instincts ? They could eat their own homosexual shit for all we care.   We will NOT allow homosexuals to molest children behind the veil of privacy.

If a bank has sought personal details for disbursing loans then it could not be said to be an infringement of right to privacy.  


“ Liberty is the fundamental value of our Constitution.  Life and liberty are natural existing rights which our Constitution acknowledges and guarantees.  How can liberty be at all experienced without privacy”— a mindless CHOOT asked ? (  Senior advocate Gopal Subramanium ).

WE DON’T WANT GOPAL BABY TO SAVE INDIA.

The CUNTS argue “India is a signatory to the Universal Declaration on Human Rights”

SO ?


Again-

The right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 but it is not an absolute right. Article 21 says that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except in accordance with the procedure established by law. So if there is a procedure by which your privacy can be curtailed, that is permissible even now, in accordance with the procedure established by law


THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL WILL NOT UNDERSTAND THE POSTER BELOW

With the rapid technological advances of the digital age, doubts have been cast over the viability and sustainability of privacy injunctions.

How should conflicts between privacy and freedom of speech be resolved? The law cannot protect both rights when these conflicts arise .



WHEN BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL, THE LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES  PIT “FREEDOM OF SPEECH” AGAINST “PRIVACY” THEY ARE JUST KEEPING BASTARD LAWYERS BUSY RAKING IN THE MOOLAH




The Supreme Court has asserted that Art. 21 is the heart of the Fundamental Rights. Article 21 has proved to be multi-dimensional. The extension in the dimensions of Art.21 has been made possible by giving a extended meaning to the word ‘life’ and ‘liberty’ in Article 21. 

The Supreme Court has asserted that in order to treat a right as a fundamental right, it is not necessary that it should be expressly stated in the constitution as a Fundamental Right. Political, social, and economic changes in the country entail the recognition of new rights. The law in its eternal youth grows to meet the demands of society.

Right to privacy is one such right which has come to its existence after widening up the dimensions of Article 21. The constitution in specific doesn’t grant any right to privacy as such. However, such a right has been culled by the Supreme Court from Art. 21 and several other provisions of the constitution read with the Directive Principles of State Policy.

According to Black’s Law Dictionary PRIVACY  means “right to be let alone; the right of a person to be free from any unwarranted publicity; the right to live without any unwarranted interference by the public in matters with which the public is not necessarily concerned”.

Article 21 of the Constitution of India states that “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law”. After reading the Article 21, it has been interpreted that the term ‘life’ includes all those aspects of life which go to make a man’s life meaningful, complete and worth living.

The principle of the world today can be: whatever you may do, the world will get to know before you realize. Imran Khan enetered Mo#n M#on Sen’s room in Calcutta at midnight. 

By 6 AM the newspaper was slipped under the hotel room door 

WHAT IS IMRAN KHAN DOING IN MO#N M#ON SENs ROOM FROM MIDNIGHT TO 6 AM ?

n the earlier times in India, the law would give protection only from physical dangers such as trespass from which the Right to Property emerged to secure his house and cattle. This was considered to be the Right to Life. As the ever changing common law grew to accommodate the problems faced by the people, it was realized that not only was physical security required, but also security of the spiritual self as well as of his feelings, intellect was required.

 Now the Right to Life has expanded in its scope and comprises the right to be let alone the right to liberty secures the exercise of extensive civil privileges; and the term “property” has grown to comprise every form of possession — intangible, as well as tangible.

The strategy adopted by the Supreme Court with a view to expand the ambit of Art. 21 and to imply certain right there from, has been to interpret Art.21 along with international charters on Human Rights.


INDIA IS NOT A RICH SUBURB OF HOLLYWOOD STARS HOMES.    INDIA HAS MILLIONS OF HOMELESS WHO DON’T KNOW WHERE THEIR NEXT MEAL IS COMING FROM.


The Court has implied the right of privacy from Art.21 by interpreting it in conformity with Art.12 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and Art.17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966. Both of these international documents provide for the right of privacy.

Right to privacy is not enumerated as a Fundamental Right in the Constitution of India. The scope of this right first came up for consideration in Kharak Singh’s Case which was concerned with the validity of certain regulations that permitted surveillance of suspects.

International Concepts of Privacy:--
Article 12 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) states that “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence nor to attack upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to protection of the law against such interference or attacks.”

Article 17 of International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (to which India is a party) states “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home and correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation”

Article 8 of European Convention on Human Rights states “Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence; there shall be no interference by a public authority except such as is in accordance with law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

WE DON’T NEED TO APE THE WEST

WE HAVE JUST COME OUT OF 800 YEARS OF SLAVERY—  

---WITH JEW ROTHSCHILD GETTING SO MUCH OF PRIVACY ----THAT IT TOOK A BLOGGER NAMED CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL TO REVEAL THAT ROTHSCHILD RULED INDIA, NOT THE KING, QUEEN OR THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT.     



THE GRUESOME TWOSOME MUTUAL ADMIRATION SOCIETY OF FAAALTHU  TRUTH EXHUMERS  SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AND RAJIV MALHOTRA DON’T  DARE TO UTTER THE R WORD EVEN TODAY.     


AKKA RAMAYAN KA PAARAYAN KARENGA—LEKIN RAVAN KA NAAM LENE MEIN BHUNNDD FATTHA HAI !



WE WANT BETTER QUALITY OF DOCTORS IN INDIA

NEET IS A MUST

DO NOT ALLOW FOREIGN FUNDED BR AMBEDKAR NGOs TO CALL THE SHOTS ON NEET
IN TAMIL NADU THE QUALITY OF SCHOOL EXAMS IS VERY POOR

NEET-UG replaced the All India Pre Medical Test (AIPMT) and all individual MBBS exams conducted by states or colleges themselves in 2013. However, many colleges and institutes had taken a stay order and conducted private examinations for admission to their MBBS and BDS courses

WE WANT THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO STOP INTERFERING IN ADMIN MATTERS . WE HAVE AN ELECTED EXECUTIVE FOR THAT

A ROGUE CJI NAMED ALTAMAS KABIR MADE A DESH DROHI JUDGEMENT

On the LAST DAY OF HIS RETIREMENT this traitor Altamas Kabir quashed the single-window National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) dealing a body blow to uniform admission norms for MBBS, BDS and MD seats in all medical colleges and allowing private medical colleagues to frame their own admissions norms and charge, in many cases, HUMNONGOUS capitation fees.

The NEET had been welcomed by students and parents because of transparency and the respite it offered from the ordeal that the aspiring doctors had to endure until last year when they had to file multiple applications and shuttle between cities across the country to take entrance tests medical colleges would hold with no co-ordination among them. It had also curbed the room for the promoters of several medical colleges to extort hefty capitation fees.

Traitor Altamas Kabir ruled that the Medical Council of India is not empowered under the MCI Act, 1956 to actually conduct the NEET

In 2010, the bench of Justices Raveendran and Patnaik had strived to bring together the MCI and CBSE on the same page for conducting NEET. The bench was convinced that a single entrance test would save poor and meritorious students , by sparing them the physical and financial stress of having of travel from one city to another to appear in multiple entrance tests in the hope of bagging a MBBS, BDS or MD seat in a college.

NEET cut down corruption. Unscrupulous and money minded businessmen operating in the field of education would be constrained to stop their corrupt practices and it would help deserving students

WHY IS IT THAT A BLOGGER WAS FORCED TO SAVE AN EMINENT SURGEON ? BECAUSE THE MEDICAL SYSTEM IN INDIA IS ROTTEN TO THE CORE.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/11/sterilisation-deaths-of-13-tribalwomen.html

MODI LOVES JP NADDA.     HE HAS RETAINED THIS USELESS FELLOW AS HEALTH MINISTER.     ZIONIST JEWS WHO OWN EVIL PHARMA LOVE MODI AND JP NADDA

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/11/altamas-kabir-worst-chief-justice-of.html

MEDICAL SEATS ARE NOW SOLD FOR TWO CRORES.    USELESS AND CORRUPT DOCTORS IS THE RESULT OF THIS .

WE WATCH -- WE CAN SEE HOW DESH DROHI FORCES HAVE FOUND A NEW ROHIT VEMULA IN ANITHA.

WE KNOW WHY BENAMI MEDIA IS ALLOWING ATHEIST COMMIE KAMALHAASAN TO DO PROPAGANDA .     THIS FELLOW KAMALHAASAN IS THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN INDIA HAS PRODUCED SINCE INDEPENDENCE.

capt ajit vadakayil
..

DESH DROHI FOREIGN FORCES ARE INVOLVED IN CONVERTING BIGG BOSS REALITY SHOW INTO POLITICAL AND DESH DROHI SOCIAL PROPAGANDA PLATFORM

Kamalhaasan’s opening speech on the weekend episode of Bigg Boss Tamil was about the Tamilian girl Anitha ( NEET suicide ) who said  JAI BHIM  instead of JAI HIND  ?

Why ? 

We want Smriti Irani to cancel this show’s licence.    

Madame do your job , instead of pushing faalthu womens empowerment .    

Why has Modi allowed a reality show turned into a political stage for the dangerous COMMIE  Kamalhaasan?   

This fellow is just supposed to comment on housemates’ behaviour .

There was this instance last week where he grilled the audience for their anger with Juliana. “If you are livid with this young girl for a lie, why didn’t you shower the same anger on politicians?,” this dangerous commie asked.


Foreign BIG BROTHER reality is used to regularize anal sex and pedophilia by homosexuals.

Evander Holyfield was booted out of the reality show BIG BROTHER after this instance where he criticized homosexuals



In India PERVERT Mahesh Bhatt converted Sunny Leone into an icon 



The First Amendment of the Constitution of India, enacted in 1951, made several changes to the Fundamental Rights provisions of the constitution. It was moved by the then Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, on 10 May 1951 and enacted by Parliament on 18 June 1951.  

Journalist Romesh Thapar’s left-leaning magazine Cross Roads had been banned for being critical of Nehru’s policies in Madras. Thapar challenged the ban in the Supreme Court, which lifted the ban in May 1951. After that, independent India’s first government added the caveat to the right to freedom of speech and expression.

In India, the Constitution guarantees free speech but not the right to offend.   

YOU SEE—TELLING THE NAKED TRUTH IS AN OFFENCE !!   

RASCALS LIKE MF HUSSAIN AND WENDY DONIGER GOT AWAY AFTER ABUSING HINDU GODS.    

TODAY ANYBODY WHO ABUSES HINDUS AND HINDUISM ARE CALLED INTELLECTUALS BY OUR BENAMI MEDIA AND JUDICIARY. 

UR ANANTHAMURTHY PISSED ON A VISHNU IDOL AND BOASTED ABOUT IT.  

 IMMEDIATELY HE WAS PLACED ON THE HIGHEST PEDESTAL OF INTELLIGENTSIA BY OUR JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA. 

TRY PISSING ON THE STATUE OF  BR AMBEDKAR —THE SAME MEDIA AND JUDICIARY WILL FRY YOU.  THE COLLEGIUM MELORDS WILL OUT YOU AWAY IN JAIL FOR A LONG TIME.

During a seminar, in June 2014, Kalburgi had denounced Hindu idol worship as a “meaningless ritual”..   He left idols of Buddha, Mahavira,  Jesus , Mary,  Basava, Shirdi Sababa etc out of his list of BAAAAD idols.  

Commie Kalburgi further added, “One can even urinate on idols”, while quoting from Kannada Professor U.R. Ananthamurthy’s work.  

You see, now media and judges call him an intellectual .  

 The Italian waitress gave UR Ananthamurthy the Jnanpith award –after all this fellow must be having lot of JNAN to piss on a Hindu gods idol. 

The Italian waitress then gave him a Padma Bhushan—after all he said that ancient Brahmins ate beef..  

UR Anathamurthy said in 2013 that he would not live in the country ruled by Narendra Modi—such is his tolerance.





NEHRU DIED A HEARTBROKEN MAN .

ALL THOSE WHOM HE TRUSTED AND HELD IN HIGH REGARD TURNED OUT TO BE ROTHSCHILD CONTROLLED TRAITORS


NEHRU TRIED TO MAKE AMENDS BY MAKING BANNED ORGANISATION RSS MARCH IN THE 1963 REPUBLIC DAY PARADE—

IT WAS A BIT TOO LATE FOR SUCH REDEMPTION.



WHY ARE THE THAPARS TERRIBLLY ANTI-WATAN AND ANTI-HINDU?    

WHY IS KARAN THAPAR AND JNU COMMIE PROFESSOR ROMILA THAPAR SO MUCH ANTI-ANCIENT INDIA?


Below: India's LYING commie historian Romila Thapar-- a darling of Rothschild's media 



THE FALL THAPAR FAMILY HAVE BEEN HIDING BEHIND PRIVACY LAWS.

IN THE MIDST OF THE 1962 WAR WITH CHINA ,  NEHRU DID THE UNTHINKABLE—  HE SACKED HIS ARMY GENERAL GEN PN THAPAR.

Romesh Thapar (1922–1987) was a commie journalist and political commentator.  He was the founder-editor of the monthly journal Seminar, published from New Delhi, India.

Romesh Thapar was the brother of Romila Thapar, the JNU Commie professor whom I have trashed in the garbage bucket list.

General Pran Nath Thapar, Chief of Army Staff, was his Romesh Thapar’s father's brother, and the midget journalist Karan Thapar is his first cousin. 

Romesh Thapar was also related to the family of PM Nehru.  Nehru's niece, the writer Nayantara Sahgal, was married to Gautam Sahgal, brother of Bimla Thapar, wife of Pran Nath Thapar.  

Rabidly anti-Modi,  Nayantara Sehgal ( Sahitya academy returnee )  is daughter of Vijayalakshmi Pandit, Nehru’s sister.

Oh how Rothschild and his media loves these Thapars !!

During the Partition of India, Rothschild had made Thapar,the Director of Military Operations and Intelligence.

Thapar took over as Chief of Army Staff of the Indian Army on 8 May 1961 and served until 19 November 1962.  He was removed in the final days of the India China war. .

What a fuckin' disgrace !

PM Nehru did NOT trust Gen PN Thapar ( father of Karan Thapar ) during the India China war.
Getting back  to commie Romesh Thapar ( JNU commie professor Romila Thapar’s brother ) –

Commie Romesh Thapar's father Diwan Bahadur Kunj Behari Thapar ( uncle of Romila Thapar ) was Rothschild’s business partner and was a  commission agent for the colonial British Indian Army during WW1.

This explains the loyalty of Romila Thapar and Karan Thapar to Jew Rothschild.

Commie Romesh Thapar was a journalist for Times of India.  He also was associated with Indian People's Theatre Association --the cultural wing of the Communist Party of India. Till today nobody knows how Thapar family became so rich all of a sudden.

Commander K.M. Nanavati tried by the Bombay High Court ( bench trial ) convicted and sent to life imprisonment under Section 302 of the IPC for murdering his white wife’s Sindhi lover Ahuja.. 

 Vijayalakshmi Pandit ( related to Thapars ) pardoned this murderer when she was governor of Bombay.

In the case of Commander Nanavati who was held guilty of murder, the state governor gave him pardon although the minimum sentence for murder is life sentence.

She had NO authority to pardon this man. The scope of the pardoning power of the Indian President under Article 72 is wider than the pardoning power of the state Governor under Article 161.

The President can grant pardon in all cases where the sentence given is sentence of death but pardoning power of Governor does not extend to death sentence cases.



http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/08/the-thin-red-line-movie-review.html

SOMEBODY ASKED ME

DID I STOP BLOGGING BECAUSE SOMEONE ON THIS PLANET WROTE A BETTER REVIEW OF "THE THIN RED LINE" AND "BREAKING BAD"

TEE HEEEEEEE

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/08/the-thin-red-line-movie-review.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/02/breaking-bad-tv-serial-review-where.html


WELL I AM NOT IN THE HABIT OF THROWING CHALLENGES I CANT WIN-- HANDS DOWN !

capt ajit vadakayil
..

Below: Onam is celebrated only in Kerala.   This festival carried on over thousands of years is a sign of gratitude to Danava King Mahabali who also ruled the whole planet.  This festival knows NO bars --and Muslims and Christians celebrate it with equal gusto.   

Onam knows NO political leanings, caste , creed , language or any bars. We in Kerala are proud of our ancient culture and our beautiful fertile land .   

Maharishi Shukracharya was the mentor of Danava King Mahabali.   His bitter rival Brihaspati ( inferior in intellect and skills ) was the mentor of the Devas.   Brihaspati's son Kachcha did LOVE JIHAD on Shukracharya's daughter , the beautiful Devyani and their enmity ran deep.   

There was a time when the whole planet was split into two-- the followers of Shukracharya and that of Brihaspati.







SO SO SO

DERA CHIEF GURMEET RAM RAHIM HAD A TUNNEL BETWEEN THE LADIES HOSTEL AND THE GUFA , WHERE HE PROVIDED SEX TO RICH AND POWERFUL PEPLE.

IS RAM RAHIM THE ONLY ONE TO DO THIS ? WHY ARE WE LOSING PERSPECTIVE ?

RABINDRANATH TAGOREs GRANDFATHER DWARAKNATH PROVIDED UNDERAGE BOYS AND GIRLS TO TOP RANKING WHITE OFFICERS.. HE WAS A OPIUM DRUG RUNNER AND RAN THE BIGGEST BROTHEL ON THE PLANET AT SONAGACHI CALCUTTA

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/08/opium-drug-running-tagore-family-capt.html

AROON PURIs TV CHANNEL INDIA TODAY GIVES US FAALTHU GYAN EVERY DAWN BY A BRAHMA KUMARI. JUST WHO THE HELL WAS THE FOUNDER OF THE BRAHMAKUMARI MOVEMENT ?


3 YEARS AFTER OM MANDI WAS FOUNDED BY FILTHY RICH DIAMOND MERCHANT DADA LEKHRAJ - THE PLACE WAS RAIDED BY POLICE AT NIGHT ON REPORTS OF AN ONGOING SEXUAL ORGY WITH MINORS ( WHICH INCLUDED WHITE BRITISH RULERS ) !

The next day it was banned by the Govt of Sindh-- an this incident was splashed by newspapers . This was in British India.

JUST WHO THE HELL WAS CHITPAVAN JEW NAY BRAHMIN MAHARISHI KARVE --ROTHSCHILDs POODLE?

HE RAN A WOMENs EMPOWERMENT INSTITUTE --WHICH PROVIDED YOUNG WIDOWS TO THE WHITE RULERS FOR SEX.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/02/devadasi-system-immoral-lie-of-temple.html

IF GANDHI WAS ALIVE TODAY HE WOULD HAVE BEEN HUNG FOR SEXUAL OFFENCES

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/01/mahatma-gandhi-and-his-endless.html

capt ajit vadakayil
..



Siddharth Chakraborty commented: "Elst views differs from what you have emphasized on your blog, I asked Elst on Twitter to engage with you in an interview/debate, to which he agreed. The interview could be arranged through Hangout..."
Aug 29, 2017

###########

Siddharth Chakraborty commented: "Captain, would you like to have a discussion/debate on the Vedic roots of Mecca with Koenraad Elst?"
Aug 26, 2017

#################

AIYOOOO

JUST WHO IS KONRAED ELST ( A BELGIAN ) TO TAKE ON CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WHO IS FROM CALICUT--    ABOUT APNA CALICUT HISTORY?
HAS HE BEEN TO CALICUT EVEN ONCE?  WHILE I HAVE BEEN TO ANTWERP MORE THAN 50 TIMES.

ELSTs BLOG PROFILE VIEW IS A MEASLY 15,000 WHILE MINE IS 30 CRORES-- THOUGH HE STARTED BLOGGING BEFORE ME

https://www.blogger.com/profile/02503713923882807510

https://www.blogger.com/profile/14410812789424637654

SO WHAT ARE YOU UP TO ?

I HAVE NOT YET REVEALED THE TRUE HISTORY OF THE CALICUT KING

MECCA OASIS BELONGED TO THE CALICUT KING FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS. THE SHIVA TEMPLE AT MECCA OASIS PROVIDED THE BLACK STONE AT KAABA ( SE CORNER 5 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND ) . THE NAMBOODIRI PRIEST OF MECCA SHIVA TEMPLE WAS ON THE SALARY ROLL OF CALICUT KING. PROPHET MOHAMMADs FATHER WAS THE YOUNGER BROTHER OF THIS PRIEST. PROPHET MOHAMMADs FATHER WAS PARTLY IN CHARGE OF THE CUSTOMS POST FOR SPICES AT MECCA OASIS.

THE STATE OF DHOFAR ( WITH CAPITAL SALALAH IN OMAN ) BELONGED TO THE CALICUT KING. KING CHERAMAN PERUMAL OF CALICUT IS BURIED THERE . HIS GRAVE SAYS “THIYAJUDDIN “ –RULER OF THE THIYYAS. I HAVE BEEN THERE

DHOFAR KINGDOM EXTENDED FROM SOUTH OMAN TO NORTH YEMEN. THE CALICUT KINGs PRIVATE PORT WAS AT SALALA ..

I HAVE NOT WRITTEN ABOUT ABOUT SAYYID FAZAL POOKOYA THANGAL WHO WAS MADE THE RULER OF DHOFAR BY JEW ROTHSCHILD.     MUSLIMS IN KERALA CANT HANDLE THIS TRUTH.

FAZALs FATHER SAYYID ALAVI THANGALs DARGAH IS AT MAMBARAM—A MAJOR PILGRIMAGE CENTRE FOR MUSLIMS. HE WAS A YEMENI.

BOTH FATHER AND SON DROVE WEDGES BETWEEN HINDUS OF KERALA AND MAPPILAS ( HALF BREEDS WITH ARAB FATHERS AND KERALA HINDU MOTHERS ).

MAPPILAS EXISTED THOUSANDS OF YEARS BEFORE ISLAM WAS BORN ..    THEY CONTROLLED THE CAMEL CARAVAN ROUTE FROM DHAFUR TO MECCA OASIS TO WEST COAST OF PALESTINE. FROM HERE KERALA SPICES WENT BY SHIP TO EUROPE .

MY NEXT POST WOULD HAVE BEEN ABOUT THIS FATHER SON SAYYID THANGAL DUO ( HEROES OF KERALA MUSLIMS ) AND BRITISH COLLECTOR HENRY VALENTINE CONNOLLY WHO DUG THE KANOLI CANAL AT CALICUT..

ALAS IT IS NOT MEANT TO BE.

I HAVE STOPPED BLOGGING.

Capt ajit vadakayil
..


WHY DOES GOOGLE WANT TO TAKE DOWN THIS BLOGSITE ?

THE WHOLE WORLD IS RUN ON A LIE.

THE FORCES WHO RUN THIS PLANET WANT IT TO REMAIN THIS WAY.

IT RUFFLES KOSHER FEATHERS WHEN A BROWN SKINNED INDIAN REVEALS THAT PYRAMIDS WERE BUILT BY INDIANS USING VAASTU AND WATER FLOTATION POWER--AND STONEHENGE HAS 27 PORTALS FOR 27 NAKSHATRAS .

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/10/eight-sided-pyramid-of-giza-egypt.html

IT DOES NOT SUIT THE RULING FORCES WHEN IT IS DECLARED THAT THERE IS NOT AN IOTA OF SUPERSTITION IN SANATANA DHARMA-- THAT ALL HINDU GODS ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES ( EXCEPT VISHNU MORTAL AVATARS ) -- THAT THERE IS NO HEAVEN AND HELL IN HINDUISM

IT DOES NOT SUIT THEM WHEN ONE MAN HAS THE ANSWERS AND THE POWER TO TELL THE TRUTH.-- SAY-- WHAT GAYATRI MANTRA WHICH HAS BEEN CHANTED FOR THOUSAND OF YEARS AND BILLIONS OF WORDS OF BULLSHIT EXPLANATIONS WRITTEN IS ALL ABOUT -- WHAT IS SAVITUR-- THE QUASAR

THIS INDIAN BLOGGER MAKES ALL WHITE MEN EAT CROW--IT DOES NOT SUIT THEM

BHAGAWAD GITA IS A DEEP PROFOUND DOCUMENT -- IT HAS BEEN MURDERED, BY IDIOTS USING SANSKRIT/ ENGLISH DICTIONARY -- FAKE ROGUE GURUS ARE PREACHING THE FAKE SHALLOW ASHTAVAKRA GITA.. .

ALL PAST TRUTHS ETCHED ON ROCK BECOMES QUESTIONABLE WHEN ONE OF THEM IS ESTABLISHED AS A LIE

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS A LIVING LEGEND AT SEA--ONLY BECAUSE HE HAD THE BALLS TO POINT OUT THE ELEPHANT IN THE FUCKIN' ROOM AND HOLLER THAT THE EMPEROR IS NOT WEARING CLOTHES.

SO WHAT IS A LIE WHICH IS BEING TOUTED AS THE TRUTH ?

JUST A WEE EXAMPLE ? SOMEONE WANTED ONE SINGLE SOLID PROOF WHICH IS TANGIBLE.

CONSIDER THIS

#######################

AT SEA ON CHEMICAL TANKERS,  SAILORS WERE FORCED TO SPRAY METHANOL INSIDE CARGO TANKS.   THE WHOLE IDEA WAS TO USE THE TEST MEDIUM WHICH IS USED TO DO WALL WASH AND CHEAT AND PASS TANKS.

IN THE "SAFETY OF LIFE AT SEA" ( SOLAS )   RULES THERE IS A PASSAGE ON "LUNG DEMAND TIME" WHICH HAS BEEN KOSHER WHITE WASHED AS " WORKING TIME" IN THE PROSE

NO REGULATION ALLOWS SAILORS TO GO DOWN INTO TANKS AND SPRAY METHANOL .

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/01/airline-breathing-apparatus-on-chemical.html


QUOTE: By the way NO regulation allows methanol spray with SCBA IBC sets. IBC sets are not for working in the literal sense. " Working time " relates to "lung demand" of free air, which is 10 litres / min for rest, 30 litres/ min for light work and 100 litres / min for strain of fireman's lift.   Fill up a form in capital does NOT mean you have to take a flight to the capital city of your country.   SCBA sets are for emergencies and must be donned by two sailors. UNQUOTE

ON CHEMICAL TANKERS WE ARE GIVEN SPARE SCBA SETS CALLED IBC SETS FOR METHANOL SPRAYING ..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/08/scba-self-contained-breathing-apparatus.html


METHANOL SPRAY IS JUST CHEATING YOURSELF.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/11/methanol-spray-on-chemical-tankers-capt.html

QUOTE: In the IBC code , " working time " has been erroneously read by vested interests as official sanction to do routine WORK inside chemical cargo tanks. IT IS NOT SO. " WORKING TIME " IS TO BE READ AS " LUNG DEMAND TIME " -- WHICH IS 100 LITRES OF FREE AIR A MINUTE FOR STRAIN ( OF FIREMANS LIFT RESCUE) , 30 LITRES A MINUTE FOR LIGHT ACTIVITY , AND 10 LITRES A MINUTE WHILE AT REST---UNQUOTE

ONLY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HAD THE BALLS AND THE PERCEPTION TO SPELL OUT A KOSHER LIE..

TODAY VADAKAYILs WALL WASH METHOD IS USED ALL OVER THE GLOBE.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/02/wall-wash-method-chemical-tankers-capt.html

THE WORLD RUNS ON LIES.

CONTINUED TO 2-
  1. CONTINUED FROM 1-


    ROTHSCHILDs "JUSTICE IS BLIND" SYSTEM IS USED IN JUDICIAL COURTS. BASED ON THIS THE JUDGES MAKE NONSENSE JUDGEMENTS.

    IN INDIA AFTER 30 YEARS OF TAAREQ PEH TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ AFTER A COUPLE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS AND WITNESSES HAVE DIED--THE GRANDSONS OF BOTH PARTIES ARE SUBJECTED TO A STUPID JUDGEs WHIMS .

    THIS STUPID JUDGE DOES NOT BAT AND EYELID WHEN HE USES SOME PAST JUDGEMENT TO RULE YOUR CASE--WHICH IS TOTALLY OUT OF CONTEXT AND TOTALLY INCONGRUENT TO PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE

    THE SPIKED FIST WHICH CRUSHED AND BLOODIED THE NOSE ALWAYS WINS ..SEE THE FIST WAS SUBJECTED TO TRAUMA BY THE NOSE .

    THIS WILL STOP-- EVEN IF GOOGLE TAKES DOWN THIS SITE BY FALSE CHARGES

    GOOGLE PLUS ( FOR CONTENT ) WAS TAKEN DOWN WHEN THIS BLOGSITE ( RUN WITH A LAPTOP AND TWO FINGERS ) THREATENED TO OVERTAKE BBC -- ROTHSCHILDs BEHEMOTH WITH HUNDREDS OF OFFICES WORLDWIDE AND THOUSANDS OF EMPLOYEES

    ALL ARE AT A LOSS NOW-- CAPT AJIT VADAKAYILs PROFILE VIEW IS 309 MILLION. IT CAN NEVER BE OVERTAKEN .

    BEST IT TO TAKE IT DOWN AND DECLARE THAT SOME PORN STAR ( WHOSE KOSHER HUSBAND PIMPS FOR HER ) IS NO 1 -- NOT AN INDIAN TRUTH EXHUMING BLOGGER

    https://www.blogger.com/profile/14410812789424637654

    RIGHT ?

    WRONG !

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..


TO BE CONTINUED






WE ALL GET OLD.    

THIS IS MY WIFE 4 YEARS AFTER MARRIAGE-- SECURING THE CAPTAINs CABIN FOR A STORM--  


SHE WAS A GOOD SAILOR , NEVER GOT SEASICK WHEN THE WHOLE CREW USED TO PUKE THEIR GUTS OUT AFTER A WEEK OF STORMY SEAS. 


SHE IS THE REAL "MOTHER INDIA".     



A SUCCESSFUL DAUGHTER ( ONLY CHILD ),   A SUCCESSFUL WIFE ( ASK ME AND MY SHIPMATES  ) AND A SUCCESSFUL MOTHER ( BOTH MY SONS WILL VOUCH ) ..  

SHE MOTHERS ME NOW .


SHE IS A REIKI GRANDMASTER -- A BETTER HEALER THAN EVERY GOD WOMAN INDIA HAS EVER PRODUCED .    

SHE TRAVELED WITH ME FOR 9 YEARS.

I TOOK HER TO DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE GLOBE,   AND AS SUCH SHOULD BE THE MOST WIDELY TRAVELED INDIAN WOMAN .     I GOT MARRIED AFTER I BECAME SHIP CAPTAIN

SHE IS ONE OF THE MOST ERUDITE WOMEN ON THE PLANET .

SHE SUSTAINED OUR RICH ANCIENT KERALA CULTURE.    THIS IS HER GREATEST PRIZE.








ABOVE:  THE OAK AND HIS TWO ACORNS --- AT SEA , IN THE TUB

MY ELDER SON -- HE IS "THE" BEST CODER ON THE PLANET ( NOT INDIA )-- A CORNELL PRODUCT.  

MY YOUNGER SON -  A GENTLE GIANT SANS EGO .    STRONG AS A BULL.   ART LIES IN HIS DNA.








CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..