THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART ONE BELOW--
Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
This was suggested to me by police ( as genuine brotherly /well wisher advise) –why stick your neck out—fuck it captain saab, you alone as an intellectual cant do anything for the watan.. If you indeed insist to do something you must be part of a BIG and powerful organisation.
When faced with truth SPIN DOCTORS become incredulous and indignant. They avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.
ENGLISH IS A STUPID LANGUAGE WHICH CAN BE TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT
I SHOT THE CLERK ?
I SHOT THE CLERK !
WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF A DANG CONFESSION HERE
CONTEXT CHANGES WITH TIME
For example: suppose someone from Kerala says “I expect my trip to Delhi will be easy.” A simple enough statement. But what about the context, the determining conditions?
Today a person can take a flight .
Now suppose it was during the all India riots after Indira Gandhi’s assassination ?
Suppose it was in the year 1300 AD ?
The statement remains exactly the same but the context changes and then so does the meaning and our ability to draw meaningful conclusions.
If I said "I beat my wife ... . " it seems to mean one thing, but if the rest of that part of the interview was about playing tennis with her -- but that information isn't included with the quote, then the quote is misleading because it was taken out of context.
Context is the set of circumstances, time, place, background, environment within which something takes place. Context determines the conditions and the meaning in which something is understood.
What the context does is set the statement into a very specific reality and its meaning is determined according to that reality.
A context is a scheme of relations that alters the way we understand things. That set of relations can very broadly and deeply expand out or it can be narrow and pointed making the latter much more easy to grasp and draw definitive conclusions from.
So if you take something out of its scheme of relations you shift the base upon which you can draw conclusions.
An agenda is essentially a list, a plan, or outline of things to be done. Its focus is on those things which must be driven forward, acted upon, or processed. Also an agenda is static.
It is limited by the list for a given meeting or event whereas a context is dynamic, it is alive in the sense that it moves, grows, advances, recedes, and changes and with that the meanings of the agenda items change.
For example when the context shifts the urgency of an agenda item can be increased or decreased. For a meeting to be successful the underlying context should be announced so that everyone can be on the same trajectory and decisions can be set up for success.
Context and agenda fit together seamlessly only if this difference is understood.
Context is any information that characterize the environment of an entity (a person, group of person, a place or an object) relevant to the interaction of the application and the users .
Context means, understanding the whole environment and current situation of the entity. In the pure theory, modeling context consist in answer the questions associated with the entity and the action: Who was the entity, Where the action took place, What the actions were, When did it happen, and How it performed the action.
Context-awareness aims to enable better service delivery through proactively adapting use, access, structure and behavior of information, services applications and physical resources with respect to available context information .
On the other hand, Situation-awareness means the understanding of the events related with the entity and its context in a concrete situation by determining its role. In that way, the situation could be seen as a course of events that evolves to more sophisticated relations between entities (or even situations).
The situations change with certain probability from one condition into another (or the same one) according the incoming events, so, it aims to predict what is the current situation and what will be the next one
Situational Awareness is the ability to identify, process, and comprehend the critical elements of information about what is happening to the team with regards to the mission. More simply, it's knowing what is going on around you.
Situations are often defined as, "the condition" or "the current state of affairs".
Therefore, the term "situation" is more knowledge and information rich than "context".
Context is commonly defined as "the set of circumstances or facts that surround a particular event, situation, etc."
Therefore, "context" is used to describe, define and detect "situations" and generally speaking, the more context you have, the better a situation can be "perceived."
DUFFER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES CANT GRASP ALL THIS
As nouns the difference between circumstance and context is that –
---circumstance is that which attends, or relates to, or in some way affects, a fact or event; an attendant thing or state of things –
-- context is the surroundings, circumstances, environment, background or settings that determine, specify, or clarify the meaning of an event or other occurrence.
Context is a very powerful thing—our DUFFER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES cant figure it out.
Much more than a catch phrase for politicians caught out with a gaff (“I may have said that but you’re taking it completely out of context”)--
It can mean the difference between a message and meaning, a presence and an inner truth, and even one’s definition of right and wrong.
Almost anything which happens in life has meanings which differ depending on the context in which it occurs.
Likewise, context is vital to any case.
JUDGES MUST TRAINED IN CONTEXT .
THIS POST CAN BE IN THE CURRICULUM FOR TRAINING JUDGES – LEAVE OUT ORNAMENTS -- NAY-- BAD WORDS LIKE TWAT , CHOOT AND CUNT.
Ignoring context can not only hinder an investigation but can leave both the investigator and client liable for missed information.
A JUDGE WHO IGNORES CONTEXT MUST BE SACKED—OR IMPEACHED – IF IT MAKES THE DUFFER MELORDS FEEL ANY BETTER .
TO BE FRANK , HOW MANY DUFFER JUDGES CAN READ THIS POST ( TWICE ) AND THEN EXPLAIN IT BACK TO SOMEONE ?
Context helps all understand what they otherwise wouldn't be able to comprehend.
Below: KOSHER justice !
Below: KOSHER justice !
A non-sequitur is completely illogical nonsense.. Most DUFFER collegium judges are swayed by non-sequitur.
In a MAD non sequitur, G. W. Bush tells the US troops: --
"It is wonderful to bravely, patriotically, serve your country and fight terrorism. I am committed to fighting terrorism. Some of you may die in this war, but that is a sacrifice that I am willing to make. Bring 'em on!"
MOST OF OUR COLLEGIUM , LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES ARE NO BETTER THAN BUSH
The supporters of George W. Bush insist that having investigations to discover the truth behind Bush's many, many mistakes, deceptions, and false statements regarding the war in Iraq would not be good for America:
"We can't discover the truth right now; we are in a war against terrorism."
Senior George Bush was in Dubai, where he was harshly criticized for the foreign policy of the United States and the military adventurism of his son. Papa Bush responded, "How come everybody wants to come to the United States if the United States is so bad?"
That is a non sequitur.
There are many good reasons for wanting to come to the United States which do not imply approval of George W.'s bombing and invasion of Afghanistan and Iraqi, or his policy of unquestioning support of Israel. One good reason for coming to the USA is to get away from American bombing in their nations . Another good reason is to get away from American-trained death squads in military dictatorships around the world.
Another non sequitur: a cult old-timer declares, "I dedicated my life to the cult. I worked hard for 20 years to promote it and recruit new members. Therefore I am noble and selfless and the cult is wonderful, and we all live lives of self-sacrifice to help others."
This non sequitur might be called "proof by delusion": "I saw lights, so it was a spiritual experience." Many FAKE gurus in India claim this.
Non sequitur means "it does not follow" — the logic is broken. If there is a chain of argument, every link in the chain must work.
A non sequitur can be something like this:
"I supported terrorists today. I did just a little bit of cannabis , I thought I was just having fun, but I gave money to terrorists when I did that."
WE DONT WANT LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES IN INDIA .. .
WE DONT WANT ANTI-WATAN , ANTI-HINDU ATHEIST COMMIE JUDGES IN INDIA.
Consider one of Mormon Mitt Romney’s most famous remarks: "Corporations are people, my friend." When the audience jeered, he elaborated: "Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes? Whose pockets? Whose pockets? People’s pockets."
The fact that people get money from corporations does not mean that corporations are people, entitled to human rights, like freedom of speech or the right to vote. Corporations cannot be imprisoned for their crimes, can they? Or be given the death sentence for polluting children to death. Or die of old age. Or get cancer. Or bleed and suffer.
Corporations are actually just legal fictions that allow some people to do business without being liable for the consequences of their actions. If the same people do business as a partnership, they can be put in prison for their crimes.
The modus operandi of the JNU commie professors and Naxal indoctrination party is to make people feel guilty. They were made to feel guilty for being part of "a rich racist and fascist society where they never cared about the fate of the poor dalit/ tribal “.
Then the dalits/ tribals had to confess that in self-criticism sessions, and then the only way to atone for such sins was to love and praise the wonderful Chinese Communist society where everyone was equal (but some people were more equal than others).
Fear, especially fear of death, is a particularly powerful emotion, one that can be manipulated to good advantage:
A preacher who wants to increase attendance at his church advertises: "Don't wait for the hearse to take you to church."
IN INDIA THE NCW AND COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY HAS LOCKED AWAY MANY INNOCENT MEN ON FALSE RAPE CHARGES
THEY IGNORE CONTEXT.
AN UNMARRIED COUPLE HAVE BEEN LIVING TOGETHER IN A FLAT .
BUT AFTER TEN YEARS , THE MAN HAS FOUND OUT THAT HIS PARTNER HAS BEEN SLEEPING AROUND WITH OTHER MEN.
WHEN HE TRIES TO MOVE AWAY, THE WOMAN FILES RAPE CHARGES.
THE JUDGE IGNORES THE TRUTH THAT THIS WOMAN HAS HAD SEX WITH DOZENS OF MEN .
EVEN WHORES FILE RAPE CHARGES .
THE JUDGE IGNORES THE TRUTH THAT THE WOMAN IS A WELL KNOWN WHORE WHO WAS CAUGHT STEALING MONEY FROM HER CLIENTS PURSE.
THE ANONYMITY ATTACHED TO THE CASE PREVENTS HER PREVIOUS “ROBBED “ CUSTOMERS FROM COMING TO GIVE EVIDENCE.
NCW HAS BEEN CREATED IN INDIA BY THE BILDERBERG CLUB SO THAT THE PLAYING FIELD CAN BE TILTED. ANY WOMAN CAN CRY MOLESTATION.
PROMISING CAREERS OF MEN CAN BE PULVERISED WITHIN SECONDS
Even consensual sex based on a promise of marriage, cannot be termed as rape in case the promise is not fulfilled. No man wants to marry a LIVE IN woman who is having sex with dozens of men behind his back.
When there is insufficient supporting evidence to determine whether an accusation is true or false, it is described as "unsubstantiated" or "unfounded".
Accusations that are determined to be false based on corroborating evidence can be divided into three categories:-
An allegation that is completely false in that the events that were alleged did not occur;
An allegation that describes events that did occur, but were perpetrated by an individual who is not accused, and in which the accused person is innocent.
An allegation that is partially true and partially false, in that it mixes descriptions of events that actually happened with other events that did not occur.
IN WESTERN NATIONS MORE THAN 20% OF RAPE CHARGES LEVELED BY LIVE IN WOMEN HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE FALSE.
ALMOST ALL HOMOSEXUALS ARE PEDOPHILES. YET WHEN A PEDOPHILIA ACCUSATION IS MADE AGAINST A HOMOSEXUAL , THE LAW ( SPONSORED BY THE NEW WORLD ORDER ) IS VERY LAX.
IN INDIA A LOT OF WORK PLACE SEXUAL BULLYING/ HARASSMENT CHARGES , IS WHEN THE WOMAN IS DENIED A PROMOTION OR A RAISE – BECAUSE SHE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH
NO SANE MAN WILL GO AFTER A WOMAN “IN SWEET PURSUIT OF LOVE” IF SHE HISSES AT HIM AND WARNS HIM THAT SHE WILL EXPOSE HIM NEXT TIME .. .
THERE IS A VERY THIN LINE BETWEEN “SWEET PURSUIT OF LOVE” AND “STALKING” .
HORMONES OF THE WOMAN USUALLY DECIDES . ..
People who understand the science of NAGGING knows how hormones play up in a woman ..
Some women are addicted to the foul game of BLOW HOT BLOW COLD.
A lot of our judges suffer from APOPHENIA. Some are so anti-Hindu that they see Hindus as superstitious savages.
Apophenia is also known as "seeing through tinted lenses".
People's brains have an unfortunate tendency to see what they expect to see, and only notice what they want to see. Once somebody buys into a peculiar model of reality, a perceptual filter kicks in where they notice more and more "facts" that appear to reinforce their chosen beliefs, and they ignore any conflicting information that comes along, so they become more and more convinced of the correctness of their beliefs: "It's all so obvious to anyone who learns the real truth!"
Apophenia is the experience of seeing meaningful patterns or connections in random or meaningless data.
"All of us show bias when it comes to what information we take in. We typically focus on anything that agrees with the outcome we want."
"We need to acknowledge our tendency to incorrectly process challenging news and actively push ourselves to hear the bad as well as the good."
Some phenomena classified under the general umbrella of apophenia include:
Clustering illusion: Related to an inability to recognise actual random patterns. Uneven clusters caused by true randomness are mistaken for patterns.
Confirmation bias: A bias towards testing to confirm ones' hypothesis rather than disprove it.
Gambler's fallacy: Feeling that past events reflect and alter probability when, in fact, they don't.
Pareidolia: Seeing shapes, most often faces, in random patterns
A feeling of a loss of control can increase the detection of false patterns in random data such as visual noise and stock market reports.
Human perception can, at times, be unreliable and one notable flaw in our capabilities of sensory perception which indicates this is a phenomenon known as apophenia.
Pareidolia is the name given to a psychological phenomenon which is usually brought on by images or sounds that we don’t consciously recognize.
PERCEPTION IS PATTERN MATCHING
This causes our minds to search the subconscious ‘database’ for similar patterns stored in our memory, which causes us to see things that are not really there.
Although apophenia and pareidolia are essentially the same thing, apophenia is the name given to the actual experience, whereas the term pareidolia is the name given to describe the psychological phenomenon.
Humans are pattern-seeking, storytelling animals. We look for and find patterns in our world and in our lives, then weave narratives around those patterns to bring them to life and give them meaning. Such is the stuff of which myth, religion, history, and science are made
Now I will talk about AD HOMINEM PERSONAL ATTACKS
YESTERDAY ON TV I SAW A DISCUSSION , BETWEEN MANISH SISODIA, TAREK FATAH, SWAMY AND NAPALAT.
WHEN MANISH SISODIA WAS GETTING SCREWED BY TAREK FATAH , HE CALLED HIM AN OUTSIDER.
THIS MADE TAREK FATAH RETORT “ OH , I DID NOT KNOW ONLY INDIANS ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK IN THIS DISCUSSION “
--AND THE HE KEPT PEERING INTO HIS MOBILE PHONE TILL THE DISCUSSION ENDED.
When you can't refute factual arguments, kill the messenger. Have fun with character assassination.
Attack the arguer and not the argument.
Ad Hominem includes slurs, slander, libel, innuendo, baseless accusations, irrelevant criticism, groundless denunciations, and name-calling.
"You are an outsider."
"You are just trying to make us look bad."
"You are in denial."
"You are just up tight. Don't be so up tight."
"You don't know what you are talking about."
"You are carrying on like an old woman."
Name calling is a kind of ad hominem attack, but it has a special power and flavor all its own.
If you can't answer a man's argument, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names.
This technique is simple and obvious: you just call your opponents names, preferably really derogatory and slanderous names, like this:
"You are a right wing hyper nationalist, and a liar.”
Apply labels to things or people — especially derogatory labels. This is very similar to name-calling.
If someone talks about universal health care, scream "That's Brahmanism !"
If someone talks about peace and freedom and justice, complain, "That's a Liberal agenda."
Delegitimize one's opponent so as to avoid addressing the substance of his argument. This is another kind of ad hominem attack.
The goal is to make it impossible for opponents to be heard respectfully in the debate.
"Those protesters are just a bunch of unruly hotheads ."
THIS METHOD WAS USED BY GANDHI,NEHRU AND PATEL , DURING THE INDIAN NAVY MUTINY. THEY DID NOT WANT THEIR SHEEN TO GET TARNISHED.
AFTER ALL ROTHSCHILD CHOSE THEM TO LEAD THE FREEDOM MOVEMENT
Attempt to delegitimize annoying and inconvenient little facts and evidence by a variety of techniques like bad logic, slurs, and innuendo. Similarly, dismiss criticism as invalid without actually answering it.
"That report is old hat." (Dismiss by Antiquity, reject by age.)
"Everybody considers that blogpost is fiction." (Appeal to "everybody knows".)
"You are criticizing Israel's mistreatment of the Palestinian people because you are anti-Semitic and racist." (Use of ad hominem.)
"I'm offended by your accusations." (Use of the tragedy drama Queen Ploy.)
Use invalid or spurious reasons for rejecting a question that you don't wish to answer.
"That question is loaded, I wont answer !"
"That's none of your business!"
SABOOOT DIYA , KUTHE KOH- DHAAAD!!
GAAND MEIN SURICAL STRIKE !
WHO IS NEXT?
CHID, SLIMY MANI, BAK BAK, YECHOOOOORY ?
THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 3 -
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL