THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 50 , BELOW-
Yajnavalkya ( 700 BC ) is a FAKE and back dated creation of Jew Rothschild .
Nobody in India heard of rishi Yajnavalkya till the white invader came to India.
Nobody in India heard of rishi Yajnavalkya till the white invader came to India.
He was placed in the court of the non-existent of King Janaka of Mithila. His FAKE theory of neti neti to describe brahmAn was spread by the white invader.
FAKE Yajnavalkya’s teachings are in the Shatapatha Brahmana and the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad—POISON INJECTED stuff.
We in india never heard of Vedic icons GARGI ( or Gargi Samhita ) , MAITREYI ( the recent fake one ) , GHOSHA , LOPAMUDRA etc till the white invader came to india.
FAKE Gargi composed several hymns that questioned the origin of all existence. So we Hindus are atheists and freemasons? The Sixth and the Eighth Brahmana of Brihadaranyaka Upanishad are FAKE and poison injected.
It is a KOSHER LIE that Rig Veda contains 10 verses written by Maitreyi. There were NO female seers at all.
Maitreyi was the wife of Yajnavlakya.
THE FAKE GARGI SAMHITA WRITTEN BY THE WHITE INVADER DESCRIBES THE WEDDING OF KRISHNA WITH FAKE RADHA .
NOBODY IN INDIA HEARD OF THIS RADHA , THE MISTRESS OF LORD KRISHNA TILL THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA.
THE FIRST TO WRITE ABOUT RADHA WAS JEW ROTHSCHILDs FAKE AND BACKDATED CREATION POET JAYADEVA --WHOM THEY DISCUSS IN EVERY DESH DROHI LITERARY FEST.
The white invader created the GARGI story to make RIG VEDA of 5000 BC , a recent phenomenon.
Let me quote Rothshchild's wikipedia.
QUOTE: Gargi Vachaknavi (about 700 BC) was an ancient Indian philosopher--- She is also said to have written many hymns in the Rigveda. She was a nun who took to preaching, a unique position in Hindu religion, which otherwise shunned such a practice by women. Gargi, the daughter of sage Vachaknu in the lineage of sage Garga (800-500 BCE. She had even awakened her Kundalini (indwelling spiritual energy). In her dialogue with Pandit Mandan Mishra on the subject of sex she had won her arguments as she was a realized soul. : UNQUOTE
Madana Misra the FAKE creation of Rothschild who also had a debate with Adi Shankaracharya ( 2000 BC ) was born only 1200 years ago.
How could MisraJI argue with FEMALE MAHARISHI GARGI ?
So does that mean Rig Veda is just 1200 years old ? Rig Veda talks only about river Saraswati, never Ganges. Saraswati dried up in 4000 BC. Even a idiot can figure this out.
Yogayajnavalkya Samhita, a classical text on Yoga is a dialogue between sage Yajnavalkya and Gargi is totally poison injected . That Gargi was one of the Navaratnas in the court of King Janaka of Mithila is BULL.
GITA PRESS WAS ESTABLISHED BY ROTHSCHILD TO PRINT POISON INJECTED STUFF FOR THEIR FAKE MUTTS.
THEY PRINTED ALL POISON INJECTED DASA , RADHA , PREGNANT AND ABANDONED SITA STUFF.
THEY HAVE CHURNED OUT MMORE THAN 72 MILLION COPIES OF RAMCHARITAMANAS OF THE FAKE ROTHSCHILD CREATED AND BACKDATED TULSIDAS IN AWADHI AND OTHER LANGUAGES -- WHERE LORD RAM KICKS OUT HIS PREGNANT WIFE SITA TO DELIVER TWINS LAV/ KUSH IN THE FOREST.
Frederick Groswe translated this book in foreign languages and called it the BIBLE OF NORTHERN INDIA. .
In Kerala we NEVER accepted the FAKE Tulsidas .
The FAKE Kanchi mutt of Rothschild propagated fake DASA stories.
GITA PRESS PRINTED HANUMAN CHALISA FOR THE DEVADASI WHORES.
Govind Bhawan Karyalaya registered by the white invader , under the Societies Registration Act, 1860
PROBABLY THE CURRENT GENERATION IS UNAWARE.
THEY STILL HOLD LOT OF MANUSCRIPTS --NOT A SINGLE ONE CAN BE TRUSTED IF CARBON DATED TO LESS THAN 400 YEARS OLD.
GITA PRESS AND THE MAKING OF HINDU INDIA by Akshaya Mukul is a journalist with the Times of India was edited by Rivka ISRAEL so that Zionist HARPER COLLINS will publish it. .
Gorakhpur is famous for the ROTHSCHILD CREATED NATH MUTT.
The Nath sampradaya was started by Jew Rothschild.
Rothschild made a guru for them named Dattatreya, a veritable 3 in 1 .
Dattatreya was touted by the white invader as the most powerful Hindu god -- more powerful than Shiva/ Brahma and Vishnu combined -- the avatar of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva all in one and born as the son of Rishi Atri and Anusuya Mata.
Then the white invader reduced Shiva to be a corpse eater and converted Dattatreya to be the GURU of the AGHORIS..
As per the white invaders encyclopedias Jagadguru Dattatrya was the first aghori-- a lot of hindus became self loathing and converted to other religions and cults .
Rothschild created the fake RamDAS who got a darshan of Dattatreya.
The Chitpavan Jews nay brahmins like Tilak , Hedgewar, Ranade , Gokhale did propaganda for ramDAS and the Rothschild created god Khandoba / Vitala / Vitobha / Panduranga.
Rothschild used ramDAS propaganda to build hanuman temples all over india . The hanuman chalisa gave solace to the desperate Devadasis.
Rothschild created imaginary conversations between ramDAS and guru Hargobind.
Rothschild created 12 sects and 12 sub sects for the NATH sampradaya
Rothschild created the FAKE story of Matsyendranath.
Our man Matsyendranath was swallowed by a fish and while inside the fish overheard the teachings given by Shiva to his wife Parvati. TEEEE HEEEEEEE
Shiva was conducting this lectures UNDERWATER - TEEEE HEEEEE ( poison injected )
Koi sunnna nahi maangtha hai na?
Our man Matsyendranath overheard Shiva’s hush hush whispers underwater to his wife Parvati.
Then our man Matsyendranath founded the Nath Sampradaya and became the first of the 9 nath ( Navnath ) sampradaya gurus . TEEEEE HEEEEEEEE
The present Mahant or Chief Priest is BJP man Yogi Adityanath. This is NOT allowed as per Sanatana Dharma
This Mutt caused the Gorakhpur riots in January 2007 when there were NO riots here even after the demolition of the Babri Masjid.
This Gorakhnath Mutt has always beeing dabbling in politics though Hindu acharyas are NOT allowed as per our religion.
Rothschild's FAKE Gorakhnath Mutt's Mahant Digvijay Nath was enrolled in Indian National Congress , to drive fissures into Hindusim and a wedge between hindus and muslims who were existing in harmony.
Rothschild used crypto Jew Ali Jauhar brothers to inflame the other side.
CRYPTO JEW JAINS HAVE DONE A LOT IN CAHOOTS WITH ROTHSCHILD TO DAMAGE HINDUISM. NOT JUST BR AMBEDKAR DALIT BUDDHISTS .
Nobody heard of his female Maitreyi , the niece of Maharishi ( SIC ) Gargi till the white invader came to India. All these stories about Maitreyi creating Rig Veda hymns 2700 years ago is all POISON INJECTED by Rothschild.
Yagnavalkya's Shukla Yajurveda is a FAKE and back dated creation. It was Rothschild ho got his FAKE mutts to divide Yajuveda into Shuka ( white ) and Krishna ( black ).
Even today North Indian worship WHITE idols which are mere statues—unlike South Indians who worship black idols.
The Brhadaranyaka Upanishad where Maitreyi gets wisdom from her husband Yajnavalkya, and how Gargi debates with Yajnavlakya is a WHITE LIE .
Rothschild created Kanchi mutt has done lot of propaganda for Rothschild about the two sections of Yajurveda ( Shulka/Krishna )
Rothschild using his chitpavan Jew Peshwas stole the original Yajurveda from Sringeri mutt along with most ORIGINAL Upanishads. Rothschild used the chitpavan Jews to inject poison .
Yajurveda penned in 5000 BC, is the book of sacrificial prayers, and it contains details of the Yajnas. It contains the liturgy (mantras) needed to perform the sacrifices of the Vedas.
The white invader had a good laugh over brandy and cigars !
HE CREATED THIS COCK AND BULL NONSENSE , BELOW !
Yagnavalyka was a pupil of Maharishi Vaishampayana in his gurukulam. He was the son of Maharishi Devaratha and Sunanda Devi .
Once Vaishampayana ( disciple of Veda Vyasa ) neglected to attend a critical meeting was slapped with a sanction called Brahmahathi (sin equivalent to killing a Brahmin)
To get rid of this Brahmahathi dosham , Vaishampayana had to do some religious ceremonies. He wanted his disciples to bear this burden . The proud Yagna Valkya told his guru, that he himself can do the needful easily , and hence why involve his disciples ?
Vaishampayana got very angry at these words . To add insult to injury Yagnavalkya offered to do the perform the penalty all by himself and he could spare all the pupils and the guru from dissolving the dosha burden. This made the guru even more angry as this he construed as supreme arrogance and a posture unbecoming of a disciple.
Vaisampayana ordered Yajnavalkya to give back all the Vedic learning and wisdom that he acquired from him dismissed him from his gurukul leave his school immediately. Yajnavalkya followed the orders of the professor and discarded all the learning, which immediately evaporated into the solar dimension.
And he became poorer in his knowledge and hence in powers and luster. Yajnavalkya followed the orders of the maharishi and mentally discarded all the learning, which immediately evaporated into the akasha. And he immediately became poorer in his knowledge and hence in powers.
The guru could see his pupils aura shrink instantly as he absorbed all the aura into his own . So our man Yajnavalkya underwent this process at midday and became ignorant— USKA BAARAH BAJ GAYA !.
He prayed to Goddess Saraswathi .
Yajnavalkya approached the Sun God and implored him to teach him more than what he lost and more than what a human like his Guru knew.
The Sun God agreed to teach and asked him to follow him in the form a horse during his continuous travel across the skies and learn. Yagna Valkya had to face the sun god’s chariot and traverse in reverse with the same speed .
Thus Yajnavlakya became a Vajasaneya, one who learned as a horse and a branch formed called Vajasaneya sakha.
This Yajurveda learned by Yajnavalkya as a horse from the Sun God is called SuklaYajurveda and the earlier one that was learned from Vaismpayana was Krishna Yajurveda.
THIS FAKE STORY IS POISON INJECTED BY THE WHITE INVADER , AS LORD VISHNU HAD NOT YET ASSUMED HIS KRISHNA AVATAR .
WE HINDUS ARE ALL STUPID MONKEYS, RIGHT ?
They have injected poison in many ways -- when Yajnavalkya vomited out his knowledge , other disciples ate the vomit like absorbed it like Tittiri birds and hence the branch that came from those disciples is called Tittiriya sakha. . The white historian wrote that Adi shankaracharya ( actually born 4000 years ago—but kicked forward in time by 2800 years ) followed the Taittiriya Shakha.
ALL BULL..ALL FIRST CLASS WHITE KOSHER LIES - - -
The Yajurveda has been split into white and black and the shattered into splinters again – and different parts of India follow different systems—all part of a GRAND DIVIDE AND RULE.
For example the Krishna ( black ) Yajurveda has many parts followed by various parts of India. The FAKE mutts have assisted in this.
There are four recensions of the Krishna Yajurveda:
There are four recensions of the Krishna Yajurveda:
Taittiriya saṃhita-- originally of Panchala
Maitrayani saṃhita- originally of the area south of Kurukshetra
Caraka-Kaṭha saṃhita -- originally of Madra and Kurukshetra
Kapiṣṭhala-Kaṭha saṃhita-- of the southern Punjab and Bahika
The white invader gave bull that Lord Rama’s clan follows the Shukla Yajurveda branch—to DRIVE A WEDGE between Krishna/ Rama followers..
The Vajasaneyi Samhita ( Shulka Yajurveda –white ) has forty chapters or adhyayas, containing the formulas used with the following rituals:
1.-2.: New and Full Moon sacrifices
9.-10.: Vajapeya and Rajasuya, two modifications of the Soma sacrifice
11.-18.: construction of altars and hearths, especially the Agnicayana
19.-21.: Sautramani, a ritual originally counteracting the effects of excessive Soma-drinking
22.-25.: Ashvamedha ( poison injected with queens having sex with a dead horse’s phallus )
26.-29.: supplementary formulas for various rituals
40.: the final adhyaya is the famous Isha Upanishad.
The Shukla Yajurveda has two branches: Vajasaneyi Madhyandiniya & Vajasaneyi Kanva.
Vajasaneyi Madhyandiniya is originally of Mithila and Vajasaneyi Kanva is of originally Kosala.
Sri Shukla Yajur Veda originally had 15 Sakhas out of which only two Sakhas or branches, called Madyandina and Kanva Sakhas are available at present . The Vedic rituals of the Ranganathaswamy Temple at Srirangam, the second biggest temple in India, are performed according to the Kanva shakha ( Shulka ) .
Madyandina Saha was used by the north India fake mutts while Kanva Sakha is used in South India’s FAKE mutts. Today even Zakir Naik quotes from Yajur Veda to ridicule Hindus.
Adi Shankaracharya had taken the original YAJUR VEDA from the Kerala namboodiris and deposited it in the librarby of the original Sringeri Mutt 4000 years ago--.
The North India ( white ) versus South India ( black ) divide by an immoral DIVIDE introduced by the white invader.
They even made Yagnavalkya , an avatar of Vishnu.
So what are the splinter groups?
Madhyandina Yajurveda: for North India- Pakistan, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat , Maharashtra ,, West Bengal, Assam, Nepal. This branch includes Madhyandina Samhita, Madhyandina Shatapatha Brahmana, Ishavasya Upanishad and Brihadaranyaka Upanishad.
Kanva Yajurveda: for Nepal, HP, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and Andhra Pradesh. Orissa party has a different text.
Charaka Yajurveda: for Maharashtra, adjacent parts of Madhya Pradesh, Assam, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh. They now follow Maitrayani YV shakha, as the white invader took texts away .
Maitrayani Yajurveda: for Gujarat, Maharashtra and Rajasthan
Kathaka Yajurveda: Kashmir, Punjab and HP
Charayaniya Katha Yajurveda: for Kashmir.
Kapisthala Katha Yajurveda: for Punjab and, Gujarat.
Jabala Yajurveda: Maharashra and Gujarat
Taittiriya Yajurveda: South India . The Taittiriyas are splintered into numerous sub-schools. Baudhayana and Apastamba were found all over South India , Hiranyakeshins in Konkan and Western Maharashtra. The Vaikhanasas around Tirupati and Chennai. The Vadhulas in Kerala and Tamil Nadu. The Agniveshyas, in Kerala and Tamil Nadu
Kauthuma Shukla Yajurveda: Gujarat, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu , Kerala, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal (tradition has been revived recently).
Ranayaniya Shukla Yajurveda: Orissa, Maharashtra, Karnataka ,Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan.
Jaiminiya/Talavakara Shukla Yajurveda: Kerala and Tamil Nadu Brahmins.
Shatyayaniya Shukla Yajurveda: Tamil Nadu.
Gautama Shukla Yajurveda: Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh.
Bhallavi Shukla Yajurveda: Karnataka.
Other Shakhas of Yajurveda: A text called 'Yajurvedavriksha' gives the geographical distribution of more than 100 Shakhas of Yajurveda.
THE FAKE MUTTS OF ROTHSCHILD HAD A MERRY TIME.
The white invader even introduces different pronounciations – for example the North Indian Brahmins pronounce the syllable ष as ख.
The white invader introduces difference in TIME. The Shukla Yajurvedis are classified into two groups called the Madhyandins and the Kanavas. These IDIOTS perform Sandhya Vandana at noon.
Well, I am getting cynical and this is NO good.
Generally the Krishna Yajurveda includes the Brahmana prose discussions mixed within the Samhita, while the Shukla Yajurveda has separately a Brahmana text, the Shatapatha Brahmana.
Shukla Yajurveda is also known as Vajasaneya Yajurveda, because it was evolved in great rapidity by Sun who was in the form of a horse through his manes .
The rhythm of recital of these vedas is set to the rhythm of the horse gallop . In Sanskrit, term "Vaji" means horse. Yajnavalkya divided s Vajasaneya Yajurveda again into fifteen branches, each branch comprising hundreds of Yajus Mantras.
According to the Mahabhasya of Patanjali, there were 21 shakhas of Rigveda, 9 of Atharvaveda, 101 of Yajurveda , and 1000 varieties of chanting of Samaveda.
Only 20 or so Shakhas of the Vedas are extant now, we do possess names of most of the lost Shakhas of the Rigveda, Yajurveda and Atharvaveda.
Only 20 or so Shakhas of the Vedas are extant now, we do possess names of most of the lost Shakhas of the Rigveda, Yajurveda and Atharvaveda.
Fragments of many of the lost shakhas are also available as quotations in ancient works. For the Samaveda, we do not have more than 40 names extant.
Imagine the damage done by the VULGAR white invader to Hinduism.
Lopamudra’s hymn, asking for Agastya Rishi’s attention and sexual love is total FAKE.
We in Kerala know better as Maharishi Agastya's first disciple Thirayar Rishi is the patron of the THIYYA community of Kerala who ruled Kerala , till Rothchild came and introduced crypto Jew rulers and demoted THIYYAS . DNA tests will NOT lie.
Similarly FAKE Ghosha’s FAKE Rig Veda Sukta 40 is utter nonsense. Rig Veda was not CREATED it was seen by seers .
No seer will SEE this sukta below— even a idiot can figure this out.
“ Where are you, Asvins, in the evening, where at morn? Where is your halting place, where rest ye for the night? O Heroes, this I beg of you. 'Be near me in the day, be near me in the night'.”
Seers saw that stupid verse above ?
Oh yeah ?
Oh yeah ?
THE FAKE YAJNAVALKYA SMRITI WAS USED BY BR AMBEDKAR TO DRIVE A WEDGE BETWEEN HINDUS AND BUDDHISTS.
The Yajnavalkya Smriti says that the very sight of a monk with red robes and shaven head (referring to Buddhists), even in a dream, is a bad sign. [Yajnavalkya SmritiI/272-273]
The white invader used BR Ambedkar to say this WHITE LIE-
That Adi Shankaracharya said that the Buddha was suffering from schizophrenia. Shankaracharya said that-
QUOTE : “he (Buddha) was a man given to make incoherent assertions or else that hatred of all beings induced him to propound absurd doctrines by accepting which they would become thoroughly confused.–So that–and this the Sûtra means to indicate–Buddha’s doctrine has to be entirely disregarded by all those who have a regard for their own happiness.”
[Shankar Bhashya on Brahmasutra 2/2/32] UNQUOTE
ABOVE IS POISON INJECTED--
ADI SHANKARACHARYA LIVED IN 2000 BC.
THE REAL BUDDHA LIVED IN 1900 BC
THE FAKE BUDDHA OF ROTHSCHILD LIVED IN 500 BC
THE GREAT INDIAN EMPEROR ASOKHA WHO CONVERTED FROM BAAAAD HINDUSIM TO GOOOD BUDDHISM NEVER EXISTED. .
FAKE Ashoka in his Rock Edict I and Pillar Edict I declared how originally thousands of animals were killed in the royal kitchen. Considering the popularity of beef-eating among the Hindus people even Ashoka, the great propagator of ahimsa, resolved later on to discontinue the slaughter of animals only for some days in the year; for example, he included the breeding bull but not the cow in the list of animals not to be slaughtered on those days. WHITE LIES !
ROTHSCHILD HISTORIANS WROTE THAT THE NON-EXISTENT RISHI YAJNAVALKHYA WAS FOND OF EATING BEEF .
The white invader injected POISION all over our ancient scriptures to prove that ancient maharishis ate beef.
BR AMBEDKAR DID NOT KNOW SANSKRIT. NOR DID HE READ VEDAS OR UPANISHADS.
YET AFTER HE FINISHED HIS EDUCATION IN ROTHSCHILDs OPIUM FOUNDED COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, HE KNEW EXACTLY WHICH ALL “POISON INJECTED “ PASSAGE IN VEDAS AND UPANISHADS TOLD ABOUT ANCIENT MAHARISHIS EATING BEEF ( SIC )
Did Hindus Never Eat Beef?
By BR Ambedkar
To the question whether the Hindus ever ate beef, every Touchable Hindu, whether he is a Brahmin or a non-Brahmin, will say ‘no, never’. In a certain sense, he is right. From times no Hindu has eaten beef. If this is all that the Touchable Hindu wants to convey by his answer there need be no quarrel over it. But when the learned Brahmins argue that the Hindus not only never ate beef but they always held the cow to be sacred and were always opposed to the killing of the cow, it is impossible to accept their view.
What is the evidence in support of the construction that the Hindus never ate beef and were opposed to the killing of the cow? There are two series of references in the Rig Veda on which reliance is placed. In one of these, the cow is spoken of as Aghnya. They are Rig Veda 1.164, 27; IV.1.6; V 82-8; V11.69. 71; X.87. Aghnya means ‘one who does not deserve to be killed’. From this, it is argued that this was a prohibition against the killing of the cow and that since the Vedas are the final authority in the matter of religion, it is concluded that the Aryans could not have killed the cows, much less could they have eaten beef. In another series of references the cow is spoken of as sacred. They are Rig Veda V126.96.36.199. and VIII, 101. 15. In these verses the cow is addressed as Mother of Rudras, the Daughter of Vasus, the Sister of the Adityas and the Centre of Nectar. Another reference on the subject is in Rig Veda VIII. 101. 16 where the cow is called Devi (Goddess). Raliance is also placed on certain passages in the Brahmanas and Sutras.
There are two passages in the Satapatha Brahmana which relate to animal sacrifice and beef-eating. One is at 188.8.131.52 and reads as follows:
"He (the Adhvaryu) then makes him enter the hall. Let him not eat (the flesh) of either the cow or the ox, for the cow and the ox doubtless support everything here on earth. The gods spoke, ‘verily, the cow and the ox support everything here; come, let us bestow on the cow and the ox whatever vigour belonged to other species (of animals); and therefore the cow and the ox eat most Hence were one to eat (the flesh) of an ox or a cow, there would be, as it were, an eating of everything, or, as it were, a going to the end (or, to destruction)... Let him therefore not eat (the flesh) of the cow and the ox."
The other passage is at 1, 2, 3, 6. It speaks against animal sacrifice on ethical grounds. A similar statement is contained in the Apastambha Dharma Sutra at 1, 5, 17, 29. Apastambha lays a general embargo on the eating of cow’s flesh.
Such is the evidence in support of the contention that the Hindus never ate beef. What conclusion can be drawn from this evidence?
So far as the evidence from the Rig Veda is concerned the conclusion is based on a misreading and misunderstanding of the texts. The adjective Aghnya applied to the cow in the Rig Veda means a cow that was yielding milk and therefore not fit for being killed. That the cow is venerated in the Rig Veda is of course true. But this regard and veneration of the cow are only to be expected from an agricultural community like the Indo-Aryans. This application of the utility of the cow did not prevent the Aryan from killing the cow for purposes of food. Indeed, the cow was killed because the cow was regarded as sacred. As observed by Mr. Kane: "It was not that the cow was not sacred in Vedic times, it was because of her sacredness that it is ordained in the Vajasaneyi Samhita that beef should be eaten." (Dharma Shastra Vichar in Marathi, p. 180).
That the Aryans of the Rig Veda did kill cows for purposes of food and ate beef is abundantly clear from the Rig Veda itself. In Rig Veda (X. 86.14) Indra says: ‘They cook for one 15 plus twenty oxen". The Rig Veda (X.91.14) says that for Agni were sacrificed horses, bulls, oxen, barren cows and rams. From the Rig Veda (X.72.6) it appears that the cow was killed with a sword or axe.
As to the testimony of the Satapatha Bramhana, can it be said to be conclusive? Obviously, it cannot be. For there are passages in the other Bramhanas which give a different opinion. To give only one instance. Among the Kamyashtis set forth in the Taittiriya Bramhana, not only the sacrifice of oxen and cows is laid down, but we are even told what kind and description of oxen and cows are to be offered to what deities. Thus, a dwarf ox is to be chosen for sacrifice to Vishnu; a drooping horned bull with a blaze on the forehead to Indra as the destroyer of Vritra, a black cow to Pushan, a red cow to Rudra, and so on. The Taittiriya Bramhana notes another sacrifice called Panchasaradiya-seva, the most important element of which was the immolation of seventeen five-year old humpless, dwraf bulls, and as many dwarf heifers under three year old.
As against the statement of the Apastamba Dharma Sutra, the following points may be noted. First is the contrary statement contained in that very Sutra. At 15, 14, 29, the Sutra says: "The cow and the bull are sacred and therefore should be eaten". The second is the prescription of Madhuparka contained in the Grahya Sutras.
Among the Aryans the etiquette for receiving important guests had become settled into custom and had become a ceremony. The most important offering was Madhuparka. A detailed description regarding Madhuparka are to be found in the various Grahya Sutras. According to most of the Grahya Sutras there are six persons who have a right to be served with Madhuparka namely, (1) Ritwija or the Brahmin called to perform a sacrifice, (2) Acharya, the teacher, (3) The bridegroom (4) The King (5) The Snatak, the student who has just finished his studies at the Gurukul and (6) Any person who is dear to the host. Some add Atithi to this list. Except in the case of Ritvija, King and Acharya, Madhuparka is to be offered to the rest once in a year. To the Ritvija, King and Acharya it is to be offered each time they come.
What was this Madhuparka made of? There is divergence about the substances mixed in offering Madhuparka. Asv.gr and Ap.gr. (13.10) prescribe a mixture of honey and curds or clarified butter and curds. Others like Par.gr.l3 prescribe a mixture of three (curds, honey and butter). Ap.gr. (13.11-12) states the view of some that those three may be mixed or five (those three with fried yava grain and barley). Hir.gr.L, 12, 10-12 give the option of mixing three of five (curds, honey, ghee, water and ground grain). The Kausika Sutra (92) speaks of nine kinds of mixtures, viz., Brahma (honey and curds). Aindra (of payasa), Saurnya (curds and ghee), Pausna (ghee and mantha), Sarasvata (milk and ghee), Mausala (wine and ghee, this being used only in Sautramanai and Rajasuya sacrifices), Parivrajaka (sesame oil and oil cake). The Madhava gr.l.9.22 says that the Veda declares that the Madhuparka must not be without flesh and so it recommends that if the cow is let loose, goat’s meat or payasa (rice cooked in milk) may be offered; the Hir.gr. 1.13, 14 says that other meat should be offered; Baud.gr. (1.2,51-54) says that when the cow is let off, the flesh of a goat or ram may be offered or some forest flesh (of a deer, etc.) may be offered, as there can be no Madhuparka without flesh or if one is unable to offer flesh one may cook ground grains. Thus the essential element in Madhuparka is flesh and particularly cow’s flesh. The killing of cow for the guest had grown to such an extent that the guest came to be called ‘Go-ghna’ which means the killer of the cow. To avoid this slaughter of the cows the Ashvateyana Grahya Sutra (1.24.25) suggests that the cow should be let loose when the guest comes so as to escape the rule of etiquette. Thirdly, reference may be made to the ritual relating to disposal of the dead to counter the testimony of the Apastamba Dharma Sutra. The Sutra says (Kane’s vol. II, Part I, p. 545.):
1. He should then put the following (sacrificial) implements (on the dead body)
2. Into the right hand the (spoon called) Guhu.
3. Into the left the (other spoon called) Upabhrit.
4. On his right side the wooden sacrificial sword called Sphya, on his left side the Agnihotrahavani (i.e., the laddle with which the Agnihotra oblations are sacrified).
5. On his chest the (big sacrificial laddle called) Dhruva. On his head the dishes. On his teeth the pressing stones.
6. On the two sides of his nose, the two smaller sacrificial laddles called Sruvas.
7. Or, if there is only one (Sruva), breaking it (in two pieces).
8. On his two ears the two Prasitraharanas (i.e, the vessels into which the portion of the sacrificial food belonging to the Brahmin) is put
9. Or, if there is only one (Prasitraharana), breaking it (in two pieces).
10. On his belly the (vessel called) Patri.
11. And the cup into which the cut-off portion (of the sacrificial food) are put.
12. On his secret parts the (staff called) Samy.
13. On his thighs two kindling woods.
14. On his legs the mortar and the pestle.
15. On his feet the two baskets.
16. Or, if there is only one (basket), breaking it in two pieces.
17. Those of the implements which have a hollow (into which liquids can be poured) are filled with sprinkled butter.
18. The son (of the deceased person) should take the under and the upper mill-stone for himself.
19. And the implements made of copper, iron and earthenware.
20. Taking out the omentum of the she-animal he should cover therewith the head and the mouth (of the dead person) with the verse, ‘But on the armour (which will protect thee) against Agni, by that which comes from the cows.’ (Rig Veda. X. 16.7).
21. Taking out the kidneys of the animal he should lay them into the hands (of the dead body) with the verse, escape the two hounds, the sons of Sarma (Rig Veda X 14.10) the right kidney into the right hand and the left into the left hand.
22. The heart of the animals he puts on the heart of the deceased.
23. And two lumps of flour or rice according to some teachers.
24. Only if there are no kidneys according to some teachers.
25. Having distributed the whole (animal), limb by limb (placing its different limbs on the corresponding limbs of the deceased) and having covered it with its hide, he recites when the Pranita water is carried forward (the verse), ‘Agni do not overturn this cup,’ (Rig Veda, X. 16.8).
26. Bending his left knee he should sacrifice Yugya oblation into the Dakshina fire with the formulas ‘To Agni Svaha, to Kama Svaha, to the world Svaha, to Anumati Svaha’.
27. A fifth (oblation) on the chest of the deceased with the formula ‘from this one verily thou hast been born. May he now be born out of thee. To the heaven worlds Svaha.’ "
From the above passage quoted from the Ashvalayan Grahya Sutra it is clear that among the ancient Indo-Aryans when a person died, an animal had to be killed and the parts of the animal were placed on the appropriate parts of the dead body before the dead body was burned.
Such is the state of the evidence on the subject of cow-killing and beef-eating. Which part of it is to be accepted as true? The correct view is that the testimony of the Satapatha Brahmana and the Apastamba Dharma Sutra in so far as it supports the view that Hindus were against cow-killing and beef-eating, are merely exhortations against the excesses of cow-killing and not prohibitions against cow-killing. Indeed the exhortations prove that cow-killing and eating of beef had become a common practice. That notwithstanding these exhortations cow-killing and beef-eating continued. That most often they fell on deaf ears is proved by the conduct of Yajnavalkya, the great Rishi of the Aryans. The first passage quoted above from the Satapatha Brahmana was really addressed to Yajnavalkya as an exhortation. How did Yajnavalkya respond? After listening to the exhortation this is what Yajnavalkya said: " I, for one, eat it, provided that it is tender."
That the Hindus at one time did kill cows and did eat beef is proved abundantly by the description of the Yajnas given in the Buddhist Sutras which relate to periods much later than the Vedas and the Brahmanas. The scale on which the slaughter of cows and animals took place was colossal. It is not possible to give a total of such slaughter on all accounts committed by the Brahmins in the name of religion. Some idea of the extent of this slaughter can, however, be had from references to it in the Buddhist literature. As an illustration, reference may be made to the Kutadanta Sutta in which Buddha preached against the performance of animal sacrifices to Brahmin Kutadanta. Buddha, though speaking in a tone of sarcastic travesty, gives a good idea of the practices and rituals of the Vedic sacrifices when he said:
"And further, O Brahmin, at that sacrifice neither were any oxen slain, neither goats, nor fowls, nor fatted pigs, nor were any kind of living creatures put to death. No trees were cut down to be used as posts, no Darbha grasses mown to stress around the sacrificial spot. And the slaves and messengers and workmen there employed were driven neither by rods nor fear, nor carried on their work weeping with tears upon their faces."
Kutadanta, on the other hand, in thanking Buddha for his conversion gives an idea of the magnitude of the slaughter of animals which took place at such sacrifices when he says:
"I, even I betake myself to the venerable Gotama as my guide, to the Doctrine and the Order. May the venerable One accept me as a disciple, as one who, from this day forth, as long as life endures, has taken him as his guide. And I myself, O, Gotama, will have the seven hundred bulls, and the seven hundred steers, and the seven hundred heifers, and the seven hundred goats, and the seven hundred rams set free. To them I grant their life. Let them eat grass and drink fresh water and may cool breezes waft around them."
In the Samyuta Nikaya (111,1-9) we have another description of a Yajna performed by Pasenadi, king of Kosala. It is said that five hundred bulls, five hundred calves and many heifers, goats and rams were led to the pillar to be sacrificed.
With this evidence no one can doubt that there was a time when Hindus, both Brahmins and non-Brahmins, ate not only flesh but also beef.
[B. R. Ambedkar, ‘Did the Hindus never eat beef?’ in The Untouchables: Who Were They and Why They Became Untouchables? in Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches, vol. 7, (Government of Maharashtra, Bombay, 1990, first edition 1948) pp. 323-328.]
AT EVERY DESH DROHI LITERARY FEST THEY DISCUSS HOW RISHI YANJAVALKYA ATE BEEF
OUR DESH DROHI AND BENAMI MAIN STREAM MEDIA REGULARLY TELL ABOUT RISHI YAJNAVALKHYAs GREED FOR BEEF
The Satapatha Brahmana gives a picture of the inordinate fondness of FAKE Yajnavalkya for beef who said: “I for one eat it, provided it is tender (amsala)”
In Taittiriya and the Pancavimsa Brahmanaswe the white invader injected POISON that sage Agastya slaughtered hundred bulls at a sacrifice. Sorry, our Yagnas were bloodless scarifices .
GHEE was used.
GHEE was used.
The white invader created FAKE sutras about maharishis eating beef.
In FAKE Sankhyayana–sutra a bull or a sterile cow should be killed in the house of the father of the bride on the wedding day and also in the house of the bridegroom when the husband and the wife arrive after marriage.
The white invader gave FAKE Yajnavalkya’s passages about the need to offer BEEF on shraddh to dead ancestors to appease their souls.
“ at sraddhas or periodical oblations to the manes, the sacrifice of a bull or cow is recommended by the Apastamba and Paraskara grhyasutras. Yajnavalkya indicates how the aroma of beef was thought to be an ailment for the spirits”
In the FAKE and poison injected Vasistha–sutra “an ascetic who, invited to dine at a sacrifice . . . rejects meat shall go to hell for as many years as the slaughtered beast has hairs.” POISON
There is NO hell in Hinduism—sorry !
The white invader created FAKE Khadira and Gobhila–Sutras where you cannot enter a new home unless ou ate beef “ the sacrifice of a black cow to the deity of the dwelling-houses when a new house was constructed” POISON
The white invader wrote that every Hindus home must offer a guest beef –as part of our culture of ATHITHIDEVO BHAVAH and injected poison in Satapatha Brahmana and the Aitareya Brahmana.
BR Ambedkar wrote that Manu recommended the madhuparka with beef for the reception of kings. He quoted the FAKE Yajnavalkya-smrti – “mah-oksa or ‘big bull’ is to be slaughtered on such occasions”
The white invader did NOT even spare the 6200 year old Charaka Samhita, where it was POISON injected that pregnant women must be fed BEEF.
In the FAKE ‘Vanaparva’ of the Mahabharata it is POISON injected “ cows killed in sacrifices to the accompaniment of Vedic mantras went to heaven and it narrates the story of king Rantideva in whose sacrifices two thousand animals, including cows, were killed every day”
Here is another POISON injection – “ In the ‘Udyogaparva’ king Nahusha was cursed and hurled down from heaven by the great sage Agastya because he ventured to cast doubts on the Vedic injunctions for the sacrifice of cows and offered insult to a Brahmana”
From the Mahaviracharita , the FAKE Bhavabhuti describes “ Vasistha, in his turn, likewise entertained Visvamitra, Janaka, Satananda and other sages with ‘fatted calf’, and tempted Jamadagnya by saying: “The heifer is ready for sacrifice and the food is cooked in ghee”
The FAKE and back dated creation of Jew Rothschild --Bhavabhuti in his Uttara-Rama-Charita (Act IV) describes how the venerable poet Valmiki, when preparing to receive the sage Vasistha, slaughtered a number of calves for the entertainment of his guests.
A FAKE and backdated creation Bhavabhuti was used by Jew Rothschild to cement the fake POISON injections into Arthashastra of Chanakya.
In Uttararamacharita the FAKE and non-existent Bhavabhuti wrote about how heartless Sri Rama kicked his pregnant wife into the forest.
At every literary fest they discuss Bhavabhuti’s FAKE story of Sita being banished by a jealous Rama
At every literary fest they discuss Bhavabhuti’s FAKE story of Sita being banished by a jealous Rama
Bhavabhuti’s narrative is full of ridiculous melodrama about Vishnu avatar Rama.
QUOTE: Rama finds himself in Dandakaranya. Wandering into Janasthana, he is assaulted by the memories of his once happy days there, spent in the company of his beloved Sita. His distress makes him cry out:
Alas! alas! my queen! My heart breaks, my limbs fall apart,
A fire consumes me incessantly, the world seems empty.
My distressed soul sinks despondent into a blinding darkness,
And a stupor comes over me. Luckless as I am whatever shall I do?
Sita who lives in the underworld with Ganga and Prithvi is in the forest too but she is invisible. She hears Rama cry out in pain. She sees him, pale and thin with the smouldering agony within. He faints again and again when memories becomes unbearable. Sita rushes to him to restore him to consciousness with the touch of her hand. Rama senses her presence, recognises her dear and familiar touch. He manages once to grasp her hand, ``beautiful like a pile of snow, soft like a fresh lavali sprout'', but is confused when he does not see her. He despairs that his tortured mind is playing tricks on him. Sita fully realises that Rama's love is hers forever. Her anger melts away and the thorn in her heart is removed. She could now go back to him with honour and dignity. UNQUOTE
When I worked in SCI , I noticed that almost all the names of ships were FAKE Rothschild created and backdated heroes .
Rothschild used FREEMASON Swami Vivekananda ( who ate beef ) to write LIES.
Swami Vivekananda writes that Aryans used to relish beef, ”There was a time in this very India when, without eating beef, no Brahmin could remain a Brahmin” ( The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, Volume 3)
The IMMORAL white invader did NOT even spare the vedas --
In Rig Veda 10.86.14 [Indra speaks:] The worshippers dress for me fifteen (and) twenty bulls : I eat them and (become) fat, they fill both sides of my belly-POISON
Rig Veda 5.29.8 When thou [Indra] three hundred buffaloes’ flesh hadst eaten, and drunk, as Maghavan, three lakes of Soma, All the Gods raised as ’twere a shout of triumph to Indra praise because he slew the Dragon.POISON
Atharva Veda 6.71.1 What food I eat of varied form and nature, food whether horse, sheep, goat, or bullock…POISON
The white invader denigrated Lord Rama –
Skanda Purana III.ii.36.62 “[Kumarapala said] O Brahmanas, I shall not abide and honour the Royal Charter issued by Rama. I disown the Brahmanas who indulge in violence and kill animals in Yajna. There is no question of my having any respect for and devotion to these killers.” POISON
Padma Purana II.37.32b-42 “[The sinful one said] I shall tell you another fierce act (mentioned) in the Vedas. When a guest goes (ie. arrives) to the house, a brahmana (kills and) cooks (the flesh of) a goat. (They kill) a horse in a horse- sacrifice, and a bull in a bull sacrifice; a man in human sacrifice and goats in a Vajapeya sacrifice. O great king, a great slaughter of many animals is done at a Rajasuya sacrifice. At a Pundarika sacrifice one would kill (i.e. one kills) an elephant, and at an elephant sacrifice (they kill) an elephant. At the Sautramani sacrifice a beast is seen to be fit for being sacrificed. Thus, O prince, listen how at rites of various forms of killing of beasts of various species is laid down…POISON
Vishnu Smriti 51.64 When honoring a guest, at a sacrifice, or when worshipping the manes, or the gods, a man may slay cattle, but not otherwise on any account.POISON
Sankhayana Grihya Sutra 2.15.1-3 Should any one of the six persons (mentioned in the Srauta-sutra and in the Sutras 4-9) to whom the Arghya reception is due, visit (him), let him make (ready) a cow, a goat, or what (sort of food) he thinks most like (thereto). Let the Argha not be without flesh. On the occasion of a sacrifice and of a wedding let (the guest) say, ‘Make it (ready).’POISON
Asvalayana Grihya Sutra 1.24.33 Let the Madhuparka ( food for guest )not be without flesh, without flesh. POISON
Vishnu Smriti 51.61 It is for sacrifices that beasts have been created by the self-existent (Brahman) himself. Sacrificing causes the whole universe to prosper; therefore is the slaughter (of beasts) for a sacrifice no slaughter.POISON
Yajnavalkya Smriti verse 177-8 Of the five toed animals, the porcupine the iguana-lizard, the tortoise, the hedge-hog; and the hare; among fishes the Simhatundaka and the Rohita. So also the pathina, the Rajiva, the sasalka may be eaten by the twice born classes.POISON
Yajnavalkya Smriti verse 258-59 (The Pitris are satisfied) verily for a moth with the havisya (sacrificial food), but for a year with the milk rice, with the fish, with the meat of gazelles, with mutton, with the flesh of birds, with the flesh of kids, with flesh of spotted deer. With the flesh of black antelope, with that of Ruru deer, with the meat of boars, and with the meat of hares respectively for a period progessively increasing by a month are satisfied when offered to the Grandfathers here.POISON
Apastamba Dharma Shastra, Prasna II, Patala 7, Khanda 16.3-4 At that (rite) the Manes (of one’s father, grandfather, and great-grand father) are the deities (to whom the sacrifice is offered). But the Brâhmanas, (who are fed,) represent the Âhavanîya-fire. That rite must be performed in each month  Beef satisfies (the Manes) for a year.POISON
Apastamba Dharma Shastra, Prasna II, Patala 7, Khanda 16.28. By this (permission of the use of buffalo’s meat) it has been declared that the meat of (other) tame and wild animals is fit to be offered.POISON
Devi Bhagwatam 1.18.48-61…O King! One can see before one’s eyes that the drinking of Soma rasa, the killing of animals, the eating of fish and flesh and so are advised in the Vedas; so much so that in the sacrificial ceremony named Sautrâmana the rule of drinking wine and many other vratas are clearly mentioned; even gambling is advised in the Vedas POISON
Devi Bhagavatam 3.26.32-34 Those who eat meat, they can sacrifice animals in this worship of the Devî; and, for this purpose, goat and wild boars are the best. O sinless one! The goats, etc., offered as a sacrifice before the Devî attain to unending heavens. Therefore persons offering the sacrifices of goats do not incur any sin. O king! The goats, etc., and other beast offered as a sacrifice before the Devas undoubtedly go to the heavenly regions; therefore, in all the S’âstras, it has been decided that this killing of animals in a sacrifice is considered as non-killing. POISON
Vasistha Dharma Shastra 14.15. For it is declared in the Veda, ‘At a sacrificial session (sattra), which lasted one thousand years, Agastya went out to hunt. He had sacrificial cakes prepared with the meat of beasts and fowls good (to eat).’ POISON
Vishnu Smriti 51.65 That twice-born man who, knowing the exact truth (promulgated) in the Veda, slays cattle for the sacrifices (ordained in the Veda) will convey himself and the cattle (slain by him) to a blissful abode.POISON
Gutama Dharma Shastra 17.37-38 And (animals) that must be slain for (the fulfilment of) the sacred law. Let him eat (the flesh of animals) killed by beasts of prey, after having washed it, if no blemish is visible, and if it is declared to be fit for use by the word (of a Brahmana). I.e animals offered at Sraddhas and Srauta-sacrifices, though under other circumstances forbidden, may be eaten both by the priests and other Brahmanas.POISON
Vishnu Smriti 51.67 That slaughter which is in accordance with the precepts of the Veda, and has been fixed for this world of movable and immovable creatures, should be considered as no slaughter at all; because it is from the Veda that law shines forth.POISON
Markandeya Purana 32.2-5; Matsya Purana 17-31-36 The Pitris are satisfied with clarified butter and rice for a month. The paternal grandfathers receive satisfaction with fish meat for two months. Venison should be known to satisfy the pitris for three months; and the flesh of hares nourishes the pitris for four months; bird’s flesh satisfies them for five months; hog’s flesh for six months; goat’s flesh for seven months; and flesh of the black antelope for eight months; flesh of the ruru deer gives them satisfication for nine months, without doubt; flesh of gayal gives satisfaction for ten months.POISON
Apastamba Dharma Shastra, Prasna II, Patala 7, Khanda 17.1-3 (If) rhinoceros’ meat (is given to Brahmanas seated) on (seats covered with) the skin of a rhinoceros, (the Manes are satisfied) for a very long time. (The same effect is obtained) by (offering the) flesh (of the fish called) Satabali, And by (offering the) meat of the (crane called) POISON
Vishnu Purana 2.16 AURVA continued.–“Ancestors are satisfied for a month with offerings of rice or other grain, with clarified butter, with fish, or the flesh of the hare, of birds, of the hog, the goat, the antelope, the deer, the gayal, or the sheep, or with the milk of the cow, and its products. They are for ever satisfied with flesh (in general), and with that of the long-eared white goat in particular. The flesh of the rhinoceros, the Kálaśáka potherb, and honey, are also especial sources of satisfaction to those worshipped at ancestral ceremonies.POISON
Rig Veda 1.162.12 They who observing that the Horse is ready call out and say, the smell is good; remove it; And, craving meat, await the distribution, -may their approving help promote labour POISON
Rig Veda 1.162.13 The trial-fork of the flesh-cooking caldron, the vessels out of which the broth is sprinkled, The warming-pots, the covers of the dishes, hooks, carving-boards,-all these attend the Charger.POISON
Rig Veda 1.162.18 The axe penetrates the thirty-four ribs of the swift horse : the beloved of the gods, (the immolators), cut up (the horse) with skill.. POISON
Rig Veda 10.91.14-15 He [Agni/Fire] in whom horses, bulls, oxen, and barren cows, and rams, when duly set apart, are offered up,- To Agni, Soma-sprinkled, drinker of sweet juice, Disposer, with my heart I bring a fair hymn forth. Into thy [Agni’s] mouth is poured the offering, Agni, as Soma into cup, oil into ladle… POISON
Rig Veda 1.162.19 Of Tvastar’s Charger there is one dissector,-this is the custom-two there are who guide him. Such of his limbs as I divide in order, these, amid the balls [of meat], in fire I offer.POISON
Rig Veda 4.18.13 In deep distress I cooked a dog’s intestines. POISON
”And by rules of Veda guided slew the horse of noble breed, Placed Draupadi, Queen of yajna, by the slain and lifeless steed…” ASHWAMEDHA YAGNA POISON
Yajur Veda 184.108.40.206 It is the twenty onefold day, on which the horse is slain, there are twelve months, five seasons; these worlds are three POISON
Yajur Veda 220.127.116.11-4 On the full moon (the Soma) is pressed for the gods; during this half-month it is pressed forth for them, and a cow for Mitra and Varuna is to be slaughtered for them at the new moon. In that he sacrifices on the day before…In that he sacrifices at the new moon with clotted curds for Mitra and Varuna, the cow which is slaughtered for the gods becomes his also. POISON
Ramayana, Ayodhya Kanda 2.20.29 ”I shall live in a solitary forest like a sage for fourteen years, leaving off meat and living with roots, fruits and honey.”POISON
Ramayana Ayodhya Kanda 2.96.1-2 “Having shown Mandakini River in that manner to Seetha, the daughter of Mithila, Rama set on the hill-side in order to gratify her appetite with a piece of flesh. Rama, whose mind was devoted to righteousness stayed there with Seetha, saying; “This meat is fresh, this is savoury and roasted in the fire.” POISON
Ramayana 3.47.22b-23 “Be comfortable for a moment, here it is possible for you to make a sojourn, and soon my husband will be coming on taking plentiful forest produce, and on killing stags, mongooses, wild boars he fetches meat, aplenty.” POISON
Satapatha Brahmana 18.104.22.168. And, verily, even on this occasion, they slaughter the sacrificial horse (Asvamedha) as a sacrifice to the gods… POISON
Satapatha Brahmana 13:2:1:1-2 Pragâpati assigned the sacrifices to the gods; the Asvamedha he kept for himself. The gods said to him, ‘Surely, this–to wit, the Asvamedha–is a sacrifice: let us have a share in that also.’POISON
Satapatha Brahmana 11:2:5:5 Verily, then, for him who, knowing this, offers both the Agnihotra and the Full and New-moon sacrifices, they slaughter the sacrificial horse month by month; and month by month the Asvamedha is offered for him, and his Agnihotra and Full and New-moon sacrifices come to pass into the Asvamedha.POISON
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 6.4.18 And if a man wishes that a learned son should be born to him, famous, a public man, a popular speaker, that he should know all the Vedas, and that he should live to his full age, then, after having prepared boiled rice with meat and butter, they should both eat, being fit to have offspring. The meat should be of a young or of an old bull.POISON
Maitrayana Brahmaya 6.36 … Therefore (to the former) sacrifice must be offered on the house-altar with hymns, herbs, ghee, meat, cakes, sthalipaka, and other things; to the latter, with meat and drinks (belonging to the great sacrifices) thrown into the mouth, for the mouth is the Ahavaniya-fire; and this is done to increase our bodily vigour, to gain the world of purity, and for the sake of immortality.POISON
Ramayan 1.14.33-38 With great delight coming on her Queen Kausalya reverently made circumambulations to the horse, and symbolically killed the horse with three knives. Queen Kausalya desiring the results of ritual disconcertedly resided one night with that horse that flew away like a bird…Then the priest, one with controlled senses and rich in scriptural wealth, took up the omentum [fat] of the horse and cooked it as per scriptures while dropping into the altar of fire to bake as a food to the celestials…Those remaining body parts that horse are there, the sixteen officiating priests have procedurally oblated all of them into fire. POISON
Brahma Purana 137 ”After performing these tasks Rama thee most excellent among the virtuous performed ten horse-sacrifices where flesh was offered to the deities.” POISON
SORRY-- ASHWAMEDHA IS A BLOODLESS YAGNA—IT IS A “VOTE OF CONFIDENCE”
GHEE --NOT BLOOD-- WAS USED IN YAGNA
Yajur Veda 20.79 O Agni [Fire], within thy mouth is poured the offering, as Soma into cup, ghee into ladle…
Manu Smriti 5.18 The porcupine, the hedgehog, the iguana, the rhinoceros, the tortoise, and the hare they declare to be eatable; likewise those (domestic animals) that have teeth in one jaw only, excepting camels. POISON
Mahabharata 13.88 Manu has said that if a Sraddha is performed with a copious measure of sesame, such Sraddha becomes inexhaustible. Of all kinds of food, sesame seeds are regarded as the best. With fishes offered at Sraddhas, the Pitris remain gratified for a period of two months. With mutton they remain gratified for three months and with the flesh of the hare for four. With the flesh of the goat, O king, they remain gratified for five months, with bacon for six months, and with the flesh of birds for seven. With venison obtained from those deer that are called Prishata, they remain gratified for eight months, and with that obtained from the Ruru for nine months, and with the meat of the Gavaya for ten months. With the meat of the buffalo their gratification lasts for eleven months. With beef presented at the Sraddha, their gratification, it is said, lasts for a full year POISON
Manu Smriti 5.35 But a man who, being duly engaged (to officiate or to dine at a sacred rite), refuses to eat meat, becomes after death an animal during twenty-one existences.POISON
Kurma Purana 2.17.40 ”If a person invited for the Sraddha or the worship of a deity eschews meat he may have to be in the hell as many years as there are hairs on the body of the animal.”POISON
Manu Smriti 5.32 He who eats meat, when he honours the gods and manes, commits no sin, whether he has bought it, or himself has killed (the animal), or has received it as a present from others. POISON
Manu Smriti 5.44 Know that the injury to moving creatures and to those destitute of motion, which the Veda has prescribed for certain occasions, is no injury at all; for the sacred law shone forth from the Veda.POISON
Manu Smriti 5.39-40 Swayambhu (the Self-existent) himself created animals for the sake of sacrifices; sacrifices(have been instituted) for the good of this whole (world); hence the slaughtering (of beasts) for sacrifices is not slaughtering (in the ordinary sense of the word).Herbs, trees, cattle, birds, and (other) animals that have been destroyed for sacrifices, receive (being reborn) higher existence POISON
Manu Smriti 5.22-23 Beasts and birds recommended (for consumption) may be slain by Brahmanas for sacrifices, and in order to feed those whom they are bound to maintain; for Agastya did this of old. For in ancient (times) the sacrificial cakes were (made of the flesh) of eatable beasts and birds at the sacrifices offered by Brahmanas and Kshatriyas.POISON
IT IS FUTILE TO QUOTE THESE POISON INJECTED WORKS—THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF THEM.
WE INDIANS ARE NOT STUPID MONKEYS—SORRY, IT WONT WORK ANY MORE.
AS YOU CAN SEE THE WESTERN WORLD IS PALPIPATING , THEIR EAGER SYPHILITIC PRICKS AND TWATS ARE QUIVERING TO PROVE THAT ANCIENT MAHARISHIS AND HINDU GODS ATE BEEF
THE IMMORAL WHITE INVADER USED HIS FAKE MUTTS TO DO PRAPAGANDA THAT ANY HINDU WHO REFUSED TO EAT PRASADAM BEEF THAT WAS OFFERED TO GODS WILL GO TO HELL FOR ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.,
Manu was a noble maharishi. .
Meat can never be obtained without injury to living creatures, and injury to sentient beings is detrimental to (the attainment of) heavenly bliss; let him therefore shun (the use of) meat.-- Manu Smriti 5.48. TRUTH
EVERY LITERARY FEST WAS A FORUM TO MAKE THE INDIAN SELF LOATHING .
THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 52 , BELOW--
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL