March 30, 2016 at 6:30 AM
looks like indian judiciary is purposefully granted with more power and promoted by bjp,president congress by playing/blaming each other.......
like pakistan THEY CAN DISQUALIFY ANY BODY ANY TIME....THATS WHAT THE NEXT STAGE WILL BE..............
indira gandhi was patriotic and had gutts to stand up against forign power and yet to see any politician india to do that all are boneless people who spent crores of rupees in eelection and run politics like business....
IS INDIA IS A BANANA REPUBLIC ?
I WILL NOT SAY TOO MUCH AND SHAKE THE FOUNDATIONS OF THIS GREAT WATAN.
Here is food for thought !
COLLEGIUM JUDGES have grabbed power in India.
this is what the BILDERBERG CLUB wants .
this way if you control SOLD OUT COLLEGIUM JUDGES and the MEDIA you can control a nation.
all white nations want to pull down india, and the best way is to have JUDICIARY , MAIN STREAM MEDIA and UNELECTED RAJYA SABHA in their control.
OUR PATHETIC PRESIDENT PRANAB MUKHERJEE IS THE WORST PRESIDENT INDIA HAS HAD THE MISFORTUNE OF HAVING TILL NOW.
ALL HE DOES IS TO WALK ON THE LAWNS EATING MISTI DOHI.
If TN Seshan was the president of India, there is NO way an entire session of rajya sabha could have been washed out.
It is every very clear that some Rajya Sabha members are in BIG BROTHERs PAYROLL-- any Rajya Sabha member who attends parliament regularly can point out these DESH DROHI UNELECTED MPs.
The Indian President is NOT a mere RUBBER STAMP ( as told again and gain by the media and the judges)
the Indian president has ENORMOUS legislative powers-- he commands both the Houses of the Parliament .
when i was a captain at sea, my bosses in SCI were dead scared of me, as I knew my ENORMOUS powers vested to my ship captain's chair- by the President of india , via the MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT.
I USED TO QUOTE MSA SECTIONS AND MY SHORE BOSSES SHAT IN THEIR COLLECTIVE PANTS.
The Indian President can dissolve the Lok Sabha-- ( BUT HEY, JEW ROTHSCHILD LEFT HIS PAYROLL STOOGES IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS UNSHAKABLE-- THE PRESIDENT CANNOT TOUCH THEM OR DISSOLVE THE RAJYA SABHA )
WHY HAVE DEMOCRACY WHEN JEW BIG BROTHER SITTING ABROAD CAN VETO ANY UNANIMOUS DECISION BY THE LOK SABHA MPs WHO WERE VOTED IN BY THE PEOPLE ?
WE HAD THE IGNOMINY OF HAVING A RAJYA SABHA PM ( MANMOHAN SINGH ) .
WE HAVE APCO MODI CHOOSING A MERE LAWYER ARUN JAITLEY AS DEFENCE MINISTER AND FINANCE MINISTER -- AS IF HE IS THE BEST !.
I PREDICTED THIS , THE VERY MINUTE ARUN JAITLEY LOST THE LOK SABHA ELECTIONS IN AMRITSAR TO CAPT AMARINDER SINGH .
I PREDICTED TO MY WIFE , THAT AS SOON AS THE BARAK DEAL IS BULLDOZED THROUGH, RAJYA SABHA MAN ARUN JAITLEY WOULD BE SHUNTED TO I&B MINISTRY.
ARUN JAITLEY IS THE ONLY MAN IN BJP WHO HAS THE SUPPORT OF SOLD OUT BENAMI MEDIA -- WHY ?
I KNOW !
ALL IN GOOD TIME !!
If it becomes necessary to have a law then the President can promote ordinances when the parliament is not in session.
When Indira Gandhi was appointed Minister for Information and Broadcasting in the Shastri Cabinet, she was not a member of either House of Parliament. She got elected to the Rajya Sabha on August 26, 1964. She retained the position when she became Prime Minister in 1966.
H.V. Kamath, MP, moved a private member’s Bill in the Lok Sabha for the amendment of Articles 75 and 164 of the Constitution.
The Bill said thus in the Statement of Objects and Reasons: “The highest traditions of the parliamentary democracy, with a bicameral set-up, demand that the Council of Ministers at the Centre and in the States, should consist of members who are directly elected by the people and that the Prime or Chief Minister should in no circumstances be a member who has been elected indirectly.”
Indira gandhi was pushed in as PM via the Rajya Sabha back door.
If this provision was UNAVAILABLE Lal Bahadur Shastri would NOT have been poisoned in Tashkent.
Initiating the discussion of the Bill on April 15, 1966, Kamath said: “India should set an example in this matter of constitutional and parliamentary manners. The Constitution should stipulate categorically that the Prime Minister of the Union should be an elected member of the Lok Sabha…. Of the 16 Ministers of the present Cabinet, seven are from Rajya Sabha and nine from Lok Sabha. No other parliamentary democracy in the world shows such an example with regard to its own Cabinet. I am sorry to point out that one member who had been defeated in the last election had been appointed to the present Cabinet….
“The point I am trying to make out is that we are establishing bad traditions, setting up unhealthy conventions, which are antithetical to the principles and spirit of parliamentary democracy and to even the letter of the Constitution.”
DOES BHARATMATA GAIN WHEN PM, DEFENCE MINISTER, FINANCE MINSTER, I&B MINISTER ETC ARE PUSHED IN VIA THE BACK DOOR.
WHO IS ARUN JAITLEY -- A MERE LAWYER ?
WHAT IS APCO MODI UP TO ?
WE KNOW !
COMMUNIST LEADER H.N. Mukherjee warned “Already there are indications in the country that the Chief Ministers—satraps—Kamath described them as subedars—are becoming too powerful, and if in addition to the power which they have come to enjoy in the Congress set-up—they dominate in the discussions to decide who is to be the Prime Minister..., then, Sir, where is parliamentary democracy leading us to?”
APCO MODI-- WHY IS INDIAN DEMOCRACY CONTROLLED FROM ABROAD ?
Congress MP Harish Chandra Mathur said " late Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had made it abundantly clear to all the Cabinet Ministers from the other House that if they were to continue in the Cabinet after the elections, they must contest the elections and come to this House. I think at present, all that is necessary is a clear enunciation of that policy and a commitment by the government.”
Congress leader R.K. Khadilkar,said “ Only those who have popular support, those who are in touch with the people, with their aspirations and all that, alone lead the country and lead the government and for that it should be a healthy convention.”
N.C. Chatterjee, MP said ” all members of this House should support this measure that in the Constitution we should have a provision that the Prime Minister should be an elected member of this House....”
Jaisukhlal Hathi, Minister of State for Home, said: “I may say at once that so far as the government and the party and all of us are concerned, those who believe in democracy, in parliamentary method, there can be no doubt in principle that the Prime Minister should be normally a member elected to Lok Sabha.”
Indira Gandhi successfully contested the 1967 election to be a member of the Lok Sabha and attended the Lok Sabha on March 7, 1967, as the Leader of the House.
When in 1991, when Jew Rothschild’s man P.V. Narasimha Rao was elected Prime Minister, he was not a member of either House of Parliament. Yes, he is the man who brought in all these vested national agencies , who can summon anybody , fine anybody .
Rajiv Gandhi would NOT have been dead of such a thing was NOT possible.
Things are being controlled from abroad—our vote means nothing !
What happened to the solemn commitment made by the Indira Gandhi government during the Lok Sabha debate of the H.V. Kamath Bill in 1966?
Was the appointment of Manmohan Singh as Prime Minister in 2004 not a departure from the solemn declaration made in 1966 by the Congress government and the Congress party on the acceptance of the principle that the Prime Minister should be an elected member of the Lok Sabha—a principle to be implemented by “convention having more force than the written Constitution”?
The government stated in 1966 that “there may be occasions—that too for a limited period—a Prime Minister has to be from the other House”.
Rothschild man PM Manmohan Singh has continued in the post of Prime Minister for over nine years. Is it a “short transition period” as visualised in 1966?
Jew Rothschild’s man Manmohan Singh could never win an election.
Manmohan Singh despite being defeated in the 1999 general election from the South Delhi parliamentary constituency, continued to be Prime Minister
The Prime Minister is not merely chairman of the Cabinet; he is, also, responsible for the party organisation.
Even when the government has the majority in the House of Lords, the effective decisions are taken in the lower House.
It is essential, in practice, that the Prime Minister should have his finger on the pulse of Parliament; that is in the Lok Sabha -- House of Commons
HOW COULD THE ITALIAN WAITRESS BE SUPER PRIME MINISTER VIA NAC ?
ARUN JAITLY LOVES FDI . .
APCO MODI LOVES GM FOODS AND ZIONIST JEW MAAL . .
IF GOD FORBID ANYTHING HAPPENS TO PM MODI- WE INDIANS KNOW WHO WILL BE PUSHED IN AS PM BY BILDERBERG CLUB VIA THE RAJYA SABHA BACK DOOR --
HE IS WAITING "ANKH MEIN SURMA DAALKE "
Capt ajit vadakayil